Using cheap labor ensures there are more profits that go to those altruistic executives. The executives want the money so that they can donate to their favorite political/social cause.
Because if they don't give them money they will raise their import duties on themUsing cheap labor ensures there are more profits that go to those altruistic executives. The executives want the money so that they can donate to their favorite political/social cause.
There are two methods to possess enough resources; deny resources to others and/or create alternative resources. Farming technology of 1940 is insufficient to feed 21st century. 1940 energy technology is insufficient to power our 21st century Lithium production? China, Chile and Australia are the primary producers today. Will there be enough? Perhaps another, better, more efficient storage technology is on the horizon.The world doesn’t have enough resources for that. China will get as close as they can before they begin to run out.
Actually, I was thinking of all the executives in the US that are fixated on pocketing profits for themselves. Just look at the way executives pay themselves and their headquarter staff and then look at the line workers. The disparity is massive.Because if they don't give them money they will raise their import duties on themIf you think America is 100% Democratic you are in for a big surprise. A lot of monopolies, corruption and bureaucracy exist in the US (Not just China)
![]()
Yet you offer no counterargument to their claims.One of the most ignorant posts I've ever seen and one of the most gross generalizations ever.
[doublepost=1540826732][/doublepost] Hardly. It's a gross generalization and an ignorant stereotype.
And what slave-labor-produced device did you use to type your comment?This is everyone’s fault on a global scale. This is what happens when you want the latest gadgets, the second they are announced.
High demand for any product, requires a high demand for labor and longer working hours.
Pat your selfs on the back.
Because the onus isn't on me to prove Lkrupp's asinine claim that American workers are lazy false.Yet you offer no counterargument to their claims.
Each side has a good side and bad side. Apple’s good side is undoubtedly good but the bad side of it also exists. Most retail consumers usually don’t see this. Sort of like a manufacturer owner who goes home to a great bathroom and food on the table where the family says the father/husband is the best man and best provider around. On the other hand for some employees at work for him in his factory may not think so as their bathrooms are not some of the best around and food is also not some of the best around. At home wife and kids do very little as house Maide does everything while at the factory employees have to do everything themselves.
At home the toilets are made by Toto and at the factory there is a hole in the ground for employees with a bucket to fill for the flush.
I visited quite a few factories this month in China so I know both sides of the story.
View attachment 799318 View attachment 799319
Whatever. Virtually everything you can think of starts small and increases in size if you can’t see that you probably can’t see that your post isn’t worth a reasoned rebuttal.With respect to lines of "thinking"...You have no reasoned contribution of your own and are not able to rebut my points.
Not surprised.
Whatever. Virtually everything you can think of starts small and increases in size if you can’t see that you probably can’t see that your post isn’t worth a reasoned rebuttal.
Apple can never truly see the value of a proposition until it’s tried.
The, “Oh Americans will never go for it”, is a load of hogwash. Put the jobs there and enough Americans will take them.
So you are directly contradicting what the article says, right? There is actually more than one Chinese company that lost their contract with Apple because of things like this.I don’t think Apple cares. It’s cheaper in China for a reason. Reasons like this.
Please show us a source. One that isn't from 2012. Then tell us about the cost of living in China.Foxconn assembly-line workers will make as much as $400 a month, based on location and passing a probationary period. That's for 160 working hours a month, so the hourly pay is about $2.50.
[doublepost=1540845261][/doublepost]
And what slave-labor-produced device did you use to type your comment?
There are two methods to possess enough resources; deny resources to others and/or create alternative resources. Farming technology of 1940 is insufficient to feed 21st century. 1940 energy technology is insufficient to power our 21st century Lithium production? China, Chile and Australia are the primary producers today. Will there be enough? Perhaps another, better, more efficient storage technology is on the horizon.
A resource is a temporary variable.
Ok good. 3-year-old slave labor is much more acceptable than recent slave labor. I'm glad you are so progressive with your purchases.A 3 year outdated iPhone that I bought last year.
But thanks for playing sport.
I think today in China very few will work for under 4000 RMB. There is the old saying “You can hire at one salary but to be able to keep that employee you need to be able to pay a certain salary”.So you are directly contradicting what the article says, right? There is actually more than one Chinese company that lost their contract with Apple because of things like this.
[doublepost=1540852237][/doublepost]
Please show us a source. One that isn't from 2012. Then tell us about the cost of living in China.
Apple will be angry. They probably assumed all the labour was forced, but now it appears only some are. What an outrage. Tim will do another softball interview to talk about the stress of 'coming out' to deflect people who might criticise.
[doublepost=1540826991][/doublepost]
so many lulz![]()
Ok good. 3-year-old slave labor is much more acceptable than recent slave labor. I'm glad you are so progressive with your purchases.
If only consumers were more self conscious about the world they live in and the consequences of their actions. If they didn’t rush to the store to get a brand new iPhone every year just to feel better about themselves and show off to other people.
My past iPhones were bought on eBay in light use and mint condition. Great savings and you don’t make these greedy CEOs any more richer than they need to be.
Bringing all of their manufacturing to the US isn't an option no matter what the reason behind it. We do not have the skilled labor in order to execute on this type of manufacturing. The people who would take these jobs do not have the best education and would be expecting wages too high for it to be feasible for shareholders and consumers. It would ruin the company from a quality perspective and cost perspective.
Of course it can be done. You make it sound as if it's absolutely impossible for there to be domestic tech manufacturing in the U.S. There just needs to be a willingness to make it happen.
Scaring people with threats that their iPhones will get even more expensive because a small fraction of them would be produced domestically is ridiculous. China would continue to make the majority of Apple devices.
Apple somehow pays retail store staff in the U.S without doubling the price of iPhones. There are 10 stores in NYC alone in very, very expensive real estate all staffed with employees who receive a decent wage and benefits.
There is a labor shortage in China so bad they are forcing students to work in factories, yet there is very limited production in the U.S. I understand the economics of why certain things are made overseas, but this is ridiculous. Apple charges so much for its products that they could pay people $20 an hour here and still make a fortune.
This is very true but when you make this much money the very least you could do is to make sure your employees are paid well. This though raises a second question, are they Apple’s employees or the manufacturer’s employees..? Apple just gives OEM ordersI know this is a wide sentiment but people have to think like a business owner. If someone can make your product at a much cheaper price and you can save money, you usually go with it. Apple is a business - they want to make as much profit as possible.
I am not sure what you are saying here.
No, this is the fault of a manager in a factory in China, who thinks he can save his company some money by getting interns to work in a way that is cheap but illegal according to Chinese law, and against Apple’s guidelines. Which both can get him and his company into trouble.This is everyone’s fault on a global scale. This is what happens when you want the latest gadgets, the second they are announced.
High demand for any product, requires a high demand for labor and longer working hours.
Pat your selfs on the back.
Here's the problem: You are proposing that some workers will be paid more for the same job than others. So who is going to get the well paying jobs? Workers with connections of course. Like the HR manager's three kids, the nephew of the supervisor, and so on.Apple could start selling a "Made with Decency" line of their products (with minimum 25% price increase). They could include a photo and brief personal story of the person who put together the Mac, iPhone, iPad, etc. The person who put it together could also sign it (or the product box) like how Mercedes-AMG engines have a signature plate on them.
Hand assembled with decency by ___________
Please note that what this company is accused of is _illegal_ in China. If the accusations are true and proven, someone at the company will pay.What do we expect from a totalitarian regime? In socialism the collective is everything, and the individual is nothing. In socialism the end justifies the means. Power reigns over truth, beauty and goodness.
This report is not about Foxconn at all. Foxconn had a situation last year when students worked overtime who shouldn't have, but that was voluntary, and Foxconn _paid_ for the overtime. So no money was saved.Foxconn is missing the point with students...why stop there...Children in hospitals are literally just lying around all day lazy. They could be making my watch and earning some few cents for their cafeteria food so they aren't a drain on society. Further, Foxconn could save money by no longer needing to buy suicide nets...sick children are too non-ambulatory to leap off the roof of the building.
I know this is a wide sentiment but people have to think like a business owner. If someone can make your product at a much cheaper price and you can save money, you usually go with it. Apple is a business - they want to make as much profit as possible.
Apple is not the typical average business owner...
Their Profit margins are out of this world. We are talking for mountains of cash and bank reserves. It wouldn’t hurt in the slightest a small drop of millions on their bank account. Business can also have ethics and values, it doesn’t need to be all about $$$.
And I’m pretty sure Apple has the resources and the talents to build an infrastructure to make this work.
I didn't say their profit margins weren't out of this world. And how exactly is outsourcing unethical or showing a lack of values?