Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Cool, it just pops open.

iFixit repairability score 10/10.

A11 Bionic Chip with Neural Engine somehow face detected the instruction when user wanted to open it, it pops display out! So advanced AI chip probably over reacting to users facial gesture?
 
I wouldn't worry just yet. We've seen swelling batteries in a lot of devices. This isn't the same as the Note 7. They even said it was due to an issue with the Note 7 and not particularly the battery that was at fault.

We need to just keep our eyes out if it becomes more widespread.

"The first battery had a design flaw in the upper right corner that could cause a short circuit, according to Recode, while the second battery — used for replacement units — had a manufacturing issue that could lead to fires because of a welding defect. Some units of the second battery were also missing insulation tape."

Source: https://www.theverge.com/2017/1/22/14353686/samsung-galaxy-note-7-recall-reason-report
[doublepost=1506933435][/doublepost]
Yes. 2 phones out of the 10+ millions shipped.

Non-issue - gate

Only 2 affected iPhones? Much better than 9, I'm impressed.

http://bgr.com/2014/11/03/bendgate-iphone-6-plus-video-300/
 
This will be on first page on every website by tomorrow morning, mark my words.

And whose fault is that ?
- Firstly ours, for clicking on this news;
- Macrumors.com for posting obvious click bait news, mostly bad, more and more every day.
 
The expansion then placed too much pressure on the display, causing it to pop open, which may actually help avoid a fire.

There's no "may" about this. Allowing the battery to expand by popping open the phone causes the phone to fail spectacularly (and in a way covered by warranty) but safely.
 
Probably faulty 3rd party power adapters like usual.

At least one of the two was reportedly using an Apple adapter. Unfortunately, this is an inevitable side effect of cramming Li-ion batteries into phones to make them thin, and it won't go away until a safer technology comes along. In this case, one would hope that only a small number of iPhone batteries are affected.
 
At least one of the two was reportedly using an Apple adapter. Unfortunately, this is an inevitable side effect of cramming Li-ion batteries into phones to make them thin, and it won't go away until a safer technology comes along. In this case, one would hope that only a small number of iPhone batteries are affected.

Solid state batteries are coming closer and closer to actual production.
 
Oh wait, these haven’t been catching fire and spewing smoke on airplanes.

We shall soon see once they complete the investigation.

http://www.businessinsider.com/fran...ne-ipad-may-cause-egyptair-plane-crash-2017-5
[doublepost=1506944611][/doublepost]
If this happened to the iPhone X after waiting over a month for it... X.X

Problem could potentially bleed over into iPhone X if Apple continue to use bottom barrel battery supplier Huapu Technology (Changshu) Inc.

https://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/iPhone+8+Teardown/97481

H1fUrVuJh2vHs6Fe.huge
 
Lithium ion batteries have narrow operational tolerances and require protective circuitry to monitor for overcharging and low voltage cutoff. Wondering about what statistical process control Apple exacts from its component manufacturers particularly so with volatile battery technology.
 
Curious if owners of these phones utilized the inductive charging feature. It is a wildcard that Apple has less experience with than Samsung and other competitors.

The reason I am curious, is in addition to the normal heat batteries emit during charging, inductive charging adds even more due to the wasted energy associated with this charging style.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sdf and kdarling
the replies to his tweet...!!!

"Congratulations on your pregnancy. Surely a nice iPhone baby will be born"

"It surely is designed to inflate on purpose to prevent the battery from exploding. Nonetheless, we recommend that you replace the baby before it is born"
 
Curious if owners of these phones utilized the inductive charging feature. It is a wildcard that Apple has less experience with than Samsung and other competitors.

The reason I am curious, is in addition to the normal heat batteries emit during charging, inductive charging adds even more due to the wasted energy associated with this charging style.

Interesting question.

Android phones have had Qi charging for years and not have issues. The Samsung Note 7s that had thermal run-away and caught fire had been charged with a cable.

But, phones do get warm when charged. I would say my S8 is around 80F when I remove it from the wireless charger. Same for my earlier Motorola phone.
 
Now Apple is copying Samsung. Classic.

Oh wait, these haven’t been catching fire and spewing smoke on airplanes.

Not yet. Historically speaking, more iPhones have caught fire on airplanes than Note 7.

In fact, if we look at only the more dangerous in-flight (not while boarding) incidents, even just the iPhone 6 have exploded more times (at least three), since no Note 7 ever burned in flight...no doubt due to them being banned from in-flight use.

Apple's design: if there's a battery issue the device pops open so that the battery doesn't puncture, avoiding a catastrophic fire.

Ladies and Gentlemen, that's excellent engineering. Given Apple's hardware skills I would like to assume that's by design.

That's a common Li-Ion battery enclosure design, providing for vertical expansion.

What Samsung suffered from was actual physical short circuits due to bad battery manufacturing.

The trouble with Lithium batteries is that so many things can cause weakness or failure. Too high voltage. Too much charging. Too little charge. High temperature. Low temperature. Hits, pressures, bends.

Personally I'd bet that many common smartphone battery failures come about from people keeping their phone in their back pocket and sitting on it. Along with non-factory chargers and temperature extremes.
 
Last edited:
Not yet. Historically speaking, more iPhones have caught fire on airplanes than Note 7.

In fact, if we look at only the more dangerous in-flight (not while boarding) incidents, even just the iPhone 6 have exploded more times (at least three), since no Note 7 ever burned in flight...no doubt due to them being banned from in-flight use.
Maybe more iPhones caught fire, and probably within statistical norms for li-ion fires, due to the sheer number of iPhones out there? iPhone though was never recalled by the govt for battery fires or banned from aircraft.
 
We shall soon see once they complete the investigation.

http://www.businessinsider.com/fran...ne-ipad-may-cause-egyptair-plane-crash-2017-5
[doublepost=1506944611][/doublepost]

Problem could potentially bleed over into iPhone X if Apple continue to use bottom barrel battery supplier Huapu Technology (Changshu) Inc.

https://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/iPhone+8+Teardown/97481
Nothing new since May?

Wasn’t that battery supplier the same one that supplied the note 7 batteries? Doesn’t bode well here, but so far no fires.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.