Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Current Apple has no direction. No leadership. NO VISION.

They iterate on products started or completed under Jobs (the Watch was definitely started while he was still CEO), sometimes not even once a year.

They are supposedly working on a car?

Maybe they'll become a TV studio?

$1 trillion in marketshare and they don't know what to do.

The apple watch wasn't started under Jobs, Ive said he started thinking about it in 2011, shortly after Jobs died. I also remember reading that it was the first product that was solely Cook's from beginning.
They are working on a car or possibly software for a car for automated driving. It might not pan out but it could be a huge market that is undeveloped and getting a percentage of would be very well worth it.
They have the platform to deliver content so why not create some content from a studio. People are always saying that Apple isn't innovating (which it seems they want something brand new every other year) or branching out into other things. So they are doing that. I don't know if it will be good but if not then hopefully they don't put out a crappy product
 
Last edited:
Jobs died on 10/5/2011 (just to be clear). He stepped down in January, but actually retired in August. As to the car, I see it more as a technology program for Apple. I would bet that they plan on selling a bunch of technology to automakers rather than selling their own car.

The earlier statement that processors have grown exponentially is just wishful thinking, Moore;s Law was put to bed ages ago. CPU's have been only making incremental upgrades for over a decade now. My 2006 Mac Pro churned at about the same speed as a current iPhone.

Also the statement that a 2013 MBP with 16GB and a SATA based SSD is faster than an 8GB 2018 MBP is also just (wishful thinking) hogwash. The SSD alone makes the new machine much faster in everyday tasks.

As to "real" pros wanting upgradability, that's only if you consider the "real" pros to be the individual geeks making YouTube videos. Those of us in the enterprise world NEVER upgrade machines after they are in service. The only real upgrades that ever happened was replacing spinning drives for SSDs which extended their life by years.
 
There are hundreds of post because APPLE HAS BEEN IGNORING THE PRO USER BASE SINCE AT LEAST 2013. Just so you know that is five years, or half a decade, which is a long time.

No, there are HUNDREDS of these Posts IN THE PAST COUPLE OF MONTHS. If not in the past couple of THREADS...

WAY different.
[doublepost=1539977051][/doublepost]
Professionals do not need or want the thinnest computers, they want forward compatibility which means expandibility, not soldered on SSD's and RAM chips. They want a Machine to be rugged [and most people like aesthetics] and USEFUL for the price they pay.

1. There is no such thing as "Forward Compatibility".

2. You have negated your own argument by, on one hand, eschewing Soldered RAM and SSD, and then saying that users "want a Machine to be rugged". You do realize, of course, that nothing will make a machine LESS "rugged" (and MORE crash-prone) than a flaky RAM Socket or SSD Connector. You wanna see some of those Kernel Panic screens? Wanna have some SERIOUS file corruption and PERMANENT DATA LOSS? Just have one of THOSE failures happen.

Laptops are, by definition, PORTABLE. That means SOLDERED = RELIABLE. That simply CANNOT be denied nor dismissed as unimportant.
[doublepost=1539977186][/doublepost]
Ok, but the entire point of a Mac Mini was to be affordable lol. If they make a pro tier and keep an entry model I guess that would be fine.
I agree with that strategy, too.
 
The apple watch wasn't started under Jobs, Ive said he started thinking about it in 2011, shortly after Jobs died. I also remember reading that it was the first product that was solely Cook's from beginning.
They are working on a car or possibly software for a car for automated driving. It might not pan out but it could be a huge market that is undeveloped and getting a percentage of would be very well worth it.
They have the platform to deliver content so why not create some content from a studio. People are always saying that Apple isn't innovating (which it seems they want something brand new every other year) or branching out into other things. So they are doing that. I don't know if it will be good but if not then hopefully they don't put out a crappy product

They are talking about the core Mac and Phone products. NO ONE would have thought a fully Apple manufactured car as part of 'Apple not innovating'. Now, if Apple is going to sell car-related tech to the automotive industry: more power to them; I happen to be a user of CarPlay. But they need to make the Mac and MacOS what it used to be, which was great. Now both the OS and the hardware are getting worse, and are more overpriced than they have ever been.

I'll give an example: Dell charges $200 for 32 GB of RAM, Apple? $600. Dell charges $750 for a 2TB SSD, Apple? $1400. Still offering Fusion drives (at 5400 rpm no less!) in a new computer after releasing a version of MacOS that requires AFPS which is optimized for SSDs is a big F-You to their clients. Look how much they are charging for the Xs: it's insane; completely beyond the pale. When the NeXT computer came out it was incredibly expensive, but it was totally cutting edge, and Steve brought that to Apple: Tim Cook has not continued that tradition.

On the MacOS side: High Sierra was a boondoggle of a release. Mojave is better, sure, but HS set a very low bar. Basic things that used to be accessible in menus, like HiDPI (my current frustration), aren't even hidden, they are fully gone.

Other Apple software as well had great features that users loved and Apple completely got rid of them. Making MacOS more like iOS is ridiculous: a Phone will never be a laptop / desktop and vice-versa due to their very natures, and that's OK, but Apple has to treat them as such.

/Rant
[doublepost=1539978845][/doublepost]
No, there are HUNDREDS of these Posts IN THE PAST COUPLE OF MONTHS. If not in the past couple of THREADS...

WAY different.
[doublepost=1539977051][/doublepost]

1. There is no such thing as "Forward Compatibility".

Yes, there is, it's called expansion slots and ability to open the computer and replace / upgrade some components yourself; RAM and HD's. A member of this very forum posted a pic of them using an almost 10 year old Mac Pro tower, upgraded to 48 GB of RAM and an 8GB GPU, and being able to run Mojave perfectly well.

You can replace the word forward with future and it's the same thing...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Val-kyrie
How do you figure?
Apple is never going to put an NVIDIA GPU in a shipping Macintosh computer that it sells. Even the Mac Pro will see the GPU choices limited to RADEON RX (base, Polaris 30), Vega (Instinct) and Radeon Pro WX GPUs. The PCIe expansion slot module may contain a single PCIe 3.0 x16 slot, so users would have an opportunity to add an NVIDIA GPU, but Apple will not be offering them as BTO options.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Detnator
Though I care about all the announcements and I would consider buying a 14"+ consumer grade retina laptop or a bezel-less iMac, or a TB-3 Apple Display, and I will certainly buy one of the Face ID iPad Pros, the one thing that I am awaiting most eagerly is actually.... an accessory. An improved smart keyboard for the 12.9" iPad Pro.

I've gone back and forwards between the 12.9" and various MBPs several times. I would love to go iPad only (at least aside from the old iMac at home). All my work apps are ready. But I need a backlit, adjustable angle keyboard that doesn't compromise portability like the Brydge and Logi offerings do.

Will Apple up its game with the iPad Pros accessories? I might be the only one that will approach the keynote with this question in mind...

I love the Smart Keyboard for my 12.9" iPad Pro, but I really wish it had back-lit keys....and the common shortcut keys that other keyboards offer would be great as well.
 
I am not sure what that means. I guess you're saying the latest offering is always the best? While that makes some sense, I'd still prefer using these new iPad Pro's over a new MacBook, MacBook Pro, iMac, or Mac Pro released next year.

I am glad you are able to accomplish everything you need to do on iOS devices, but I have been hampered by the limitations of iOS and need the full functionality offered by macOS. I just need Apple to offer mobile hardware (particularly keyboards) that is worth buying.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bice
I am glad you are able to accomplish everything you need to do on iOS devices, but I have been hampered by the limitations of iOS and need the full functionality offered by macOS. I just need Apple to offer mobile hardware (particularly keyboards) that is worth buying.

Makes sense, it’s not a great fit for all tasks. I like the new keyboards (I used to have a MacBook) so I can’t really speak to your issue. I understand that not everyone likes them though. Hopefully they fix the issues you have with them.
 
Apple is never going to put an NVIDIA GPU in a shipping Macintosh computer that it sells. Even the Mac Pro will see the GPU choices limited to RADEON RX (base, Polaris 30), Vega (Instinct) and Radeon Pro WX GPUs. The PCIe expansion slot module may contain a single PCIe 3.0 x16 slot, so users would have an opportunity to add an NVIDIA GPU, but Apple will not be offering them as BTO options.

They did as of 2014:
https://support.apple.com/kb/SP704?locale=en_US
 
Calendar marked.

While the iPad Pro is what I’m mainly concerned with, I’m curious on the Mac Mini since I haven’t purchased a MBP just yet.
 
That was 4 years ago...and 4 iterations/releases ago. They ran out their contract with NVIDIA and that was that.

You could be right that Apple is done with NVidia for some reason(s), but you've done nothing to support your assertion, other than to repeat it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lilrush
You could be right that Apple is done with NVidia for some reason(s), but you've done nothing to support your assertion, other than to repeat it.
The 2013 Mac Pro came with dual AMD GPUs, the 2014 MacBook Pro was the last w/ NVIDIA, the 2013 iMac was the last w/ an NVIDIA GPU. Apple’s official eGPU support is limited to AMD GPUs, Apple uses OpenCL to accelerate it apps, not CUDA. Apple will move to its own GPUs once the Mac transitions to Apple-designed CPUs. NVIDIA just does not make parts Apple wants or needs as it transitions to in-house designs.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: IG88
Well they are both actual computers, but I think the iPad is Jobs’ ultimate vision of the personal computer. I remember watching videos of him discussing the future of computing, which were thin clients with cloud access. It’s pretty exciting to see how far we’ve come. Macs are great too, but they are relics when looking towards the future.
A tablet is a downgrade in every way, and is more of a relic than Mac in that you get a significantly smaller screen and the basic work you've always been able to do on a Mac suddenly becomes very difficult.

Why would anyone ever use a tablet when they can sit down at a 24 inch or 27 inch iMac? Why would anyone ever use a tablet (outside) when a modern laptop is only a few pounds and is significantly more capable?
 
  • Like
Reactions: IG88 and bice
A tablet is a downgrade in every way, and is more of a relic than Mac in that you get a significantly smaller screen and the basic work you've always been able to do on a Mac suddenly becomes very difficult.

You are assuming that the Mac had always been the best tool for the job all along.

For some people, the conventional PC form factor was the compromise, and the iPad was the solution they had been asking for all along.

To use an analogy, these are the people who were trying to drive in screws using a hammer because the screwdriver hadn’t been invented yet.

For users like myself, the iPad represents that screwdriver.

Why would anyone ever use a tablet when they can sit down at a 24 inch or 27 inch iMac?

Not sure if serious.

The whole point is precisely so they I don’t have to sit down in front of my 27” iMac.

Most people bought a computer in the last 20 years mostly because they wanted internet access. But they didn’t really want a computer, just the internet. In an abstract way, it’s like how if you wanted a portrait of your family, you’d either have to paint it yourself or hire an artist. Then photography became a thing, became cheap and accessible and the painted portrait remains on the fringes.

Why would anyone ever use a tablet (outside) when a modern laptop is only a few pounds and is significantly more capable?

You just answered your own question.

A laptop weighs more. I can’t walk around the room with a laptop in hand and use it as intuitively as I can with a tablet. When you are using it this way for hours on end, any reduction in thickness and weight is always welcome.

Likewise, the problem then comes when the areas in which a laptop is more capable in are not the same areas I need my computing device to excel in.

I have really come to love and appreciate ios for its simplicity and ease of use. For example, pages on iOS has maybe like 20% of the functionality of Microsoft word, and that’s the 20% I ever need. In exchange, I don’t need to contend with a bloated app being bogged down by tons of redundant features I won’t ever need.

That in a nutshell summarises why I like iOS over windows (and even macOS). Yes, I can’t get all my work done on ios alone, but I spend way more time on my iOS devices (particularly my iPad) compared to my Macs and my work-issued windows tablet, and I will never stop looking for ways to transition my workflows from a PC to iOS.

Which makes me wonder. Do critics pooh-pooh the iPad because they really don’t think it makes a viable computer, or because they fear the future that Apple is envisioning, and what it means for their beloved Macs?
 
A tablet is a downgrade in every way, and is more of a relic than Mac in that you get a significantly smaller screen and the basic work you've always been able to do on a Mac suddenly becomes very difficult.

Why would anyone ever use a tablet when they can sit down at a 24 inch or 27 inch iMac? Why would anyone ever use a tablet (outside) when a modern laptop is only a few pounds and is significantly more capable?

Because it works better for that individual and the tasks they need a computer to accomplish. My experience with iPad has been better than any Mac I have used over the last 20 years. The flexibility the iPad gives me in my work could never be done the same with a desktop or laptop. It’s very freeing.
 
What can I say.
Mac Pro
Mac Mini
Displays

That's all I need to see to be happy.
I want a MacMini for my kid.
I want a awesome Mac Pro and 5K displays to revamp my old MP 2011 set up. It's about time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DVD9
These are business machines for doing a job. The above solutions do the job and at least some do the job as well if not better than Apple’s official MagSafe.

Nope. I'm not sure planet you're on, but there is nothing that works better than Apple's official magsafe on the current Macbook Pro. You don't have to chance reliability problems nor rely on 3rd party reverse engineering strategies.

The current crop of 3rd party magsafes are rated for at most 60W, have power delivery issues, or are just plain unreliable. You're not going to find a dependable aftermarket magsafe solution for all current MBPs.

If you have some recommendations, please share.

It not sitting flush makes absolutely no difference to practical usage and getting the job done.

And all this time, I thought Apple was a design company. That's why they created thin laptops and phones with smaller batteries. Sure, it's all about getting the job done, right?

Some do not reliably work? That means some do reliably work.

I said some because I was hoping you would share which ones DO reliably work for 87W macbooks. It seems I failed at this assumption. Oh, don't share any Kickstarter links either.

No... you just want an excuse to whine (as inkswamp said: malcontent or difficult to satisfy). It’s unfortunate for you that this is the stuff that makes a significant difference to your actual real life.

Not sure if it's an excuse or pointing out a deficiency that many people outside of forums have expressed concerns.

I'm not sure where the "significant difference" this has on my real life. I have had 4 15" MBPs here (a 2018, a 2016, a 2015, and a 2011) for doing work and home projects.

Is it ok for me to point out a deficiency? Am I bothering you so much that I am pointing out a negative bullet point in Apple's MBP delivery?
[doublepost=1540002169][/doublepost]
ecause it works better for that individual and the tasks they need a computer to accomplish. My experience with iPad has been better than any Mac I have used over the last 20 years. The flexibility the iPad gives me in my work could never be done the same with a desktop or laptop. It’s very freeing.

You are the epitome of who the iPad was targeted for when it comes to replacing the Mac. Simple straight forward management. At my work and as a software engineer, it doesn't fit its niche at all. We cannot substitute an iPad for a MBP.
[doublepost=1540002386][/doublepost]
Which makes me wonder. Do critics pooh-pooh the iPad because they really don’t think it makes a viable computer, or because they fear the future that Apple is envisioning, and what it means for their beloved Macs?

How do you make iOS apps? Macs aren't going away any time soon unless Apple can allow you to create a full fledged iOS app in iOS. The only thing Apple is "envisioning" is ways to get more sales. Slow and steady the ship sails.
[doublepost=1540002664][/doublepost]
Why would anyone ever use a tablet when they can sit down at a 24 inch or 27 inch iMac? Why would anyone ever use a tablet (outside) when a modern laptop is only a few pounds and is significantly more capable?

For some people's use cases, they don't need a full fledged sit down experience. I used to pull out my iPad when I travel for surfing the net or doing simple tasks. Beyond that, iOS for me has been a gimpy experience. iPad for some vacations, MacOS for everything else.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tozovac
What can I say.
Mac Pro
Mac Mini
Displays

That's all I need to see to be happy.
I want a MacMini for my kid.
I want a awesome Mac Pro and 5K displays to revamp my old MP 2011 set up. It's about time.

Same here, but 8k 30"+ displays, not the same old 5k we've had for four years

Having said that, my Base 2012 Mac mini with 16gb ram and a 480gb ssd runs beautifully for the kids
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.