I'm having problems with the limitations that Apple have either applied or simply not developed to the iOS making the iPad a week product.
A "week" product? Enough said...
I'm having problems with the limitations that Apple have either applied or simply not developed to the iOS making the iPad a week product.
I am so happy that your 50 year old mother has found peace with Apple. But each user may have different needs.
I am a happy long time user of DropBox but there are time that connecting via WiFi or cellular are to an option. I need about 1900 Word files and 60-70 Excel files on my device for access ALL THE TIME. Until Apple allows this on the IPad, it will never be but an Internet appliance next to my lazy boy.
My laptop in the field still rules.
What paradigm shift? What iOS is doing is an equivalent of an application for a real OS (like OS/X) that always saves files in the same directory. On OS/X such application design in most cases would be considered a very poor implementation and this is exactly what this "paradigm" is on iOS. It's just a shortsighted decision n Apple's part which was excusable in 2007 because phone usages were still rather limited. Apple did not even have an intention of allowing native apps in iOS at that time. Bu that was 2007. It's 2012 now and iOS is clearly a very outdated OS precisely because of the missing file system. Lack of file system does not bring any advantages but plenty of limitations.
What paradigm shift? What iOS is doing is an equivalent of an application for a real OS (like OS/X) that always saves files in the same directory. On OS/X such application design in most cases would be considered a very poor implementation and this is exactly what this "paradigm" is on iOS. It's just a shortsighted decision n Apple's part which was excusable in 2007 because phone usages were still rather limited. Apple did not even have an intention of allowing native apps in iOS at that time. Bu that was 2007. It's 2012 now and iOS is clearly a very outdated OS precisely because of the missing file system. Lack of file system does not bring any advantages but plenty of limitations.
Ever heard of something called "AirPlay" from Apple? You drag and drop a video file from one device to another with a finger.
Because this is SOOOOO much more inefficient than booting into the directory and looking for the right file so you can then use an ancient copy/paste command to the other device after you've figured out which directory is appropriate for source and destination for each device, right?...
Media playing is not the only thing access to files would be useful for. I'm just wanting to reply to a simple email and attach something to it. I can't. I have to exit the mail application, open the source file app, and email it from there. And if the reply goes to 7 people, I have to re-enter all 7 email addresses. Plus I lose the original email string in my reply.
And God forbid I want to email someone a Word doc AND a photo from my Camera roll....![]()
Consumers vote with their wallets, and so far they've voted in favor of Apple's approach.
Media playing is not the only thing access to files would be useful for. I'm just wanting to reply to a simple email and attach something to it. I can't. I have to exit the mail application, open the source file app, and email it from there. And if the reply goes to 7 people, I have to re-enter all 7 email addresses. Plus I lose the original email string in my reply.
And God forbid I want to email someone a Word doc AND a photo from my Camera roll....![]()
I'm having problems with the limitations that Apple have either applied or simply not developed to the iOS making the iPad a week product. I've had an iPad for 1 year and use it frequently with great frustration.
Examples to this problem is; not having easy access to the hard drive to store the data I want. Not being able to navigate to the files through a directory structure. Apple's workaround is to force me to access data through specific applications, and or having applications locked from accessing certain data on the iPad. This creates huge limits in feature developments for applications and results in poor functionality. Example exposure to music data for assessment is only available to iTunes. It's my music, if I want to brows to it through a directory, or have an application I write access this data and analyse it, Apple should not stop or limit my access.
All in I find apples iOS very limiting. Google are becoming very popular with Andriod on mobile devises, and from the limited exposure I've had to this OS their development policy feels more friendly to the end consumer. I think Android will be creating applications that surpass the iOS capabilities over the next couple of years.
When you also consider all mobile devices look almost identicle, Apple need to start and understand they are creating a platform for people to work with, not a polished finished product and dictate what I can and cannot do with the product. The difference in mindset is huge.
I recently had a post pulled and labeled as Trolling due to my comment of the new iPad being a "Dumb Product". Although my post was short, some peoples response were very valid and the subject matter was hearing arguments on both sides. I'm hoping people see this as constructive thoughts not Trolling.
Workaround for camera roll -- Go into camera roll, copy photo, go back to email that has the Word doc attached and paste the pics into the email.
Workaround for "woops, started email without attachment" -- Save draft of started email. Go to app with the file to be attached, and start new email with the attachment. Copy the attachment, and paste it into the previously started email.
Wouldn't Goodreader or QuickOffice accomplish this? You could download all the files onto the app's sandbox and have them with you at all times. I have a
TON of PDFs in Goodreader on my iPad. I'm not a big fan of having to connect to Dropbox when I need something.
Now, if you want to reply to an email with one of those files, that's a whole other story....![]()
Seriously, I see posts like yours and it is just plainly obvious that the paradigm shift represented in iOS is way, WAY over your head. Its so obvious to a whole generation but to those still firmly anchored in last gen tech its clearly an alien, incomprehensible way of doing things.
I can, for example, AirPlay a video from my iPad to my Apple TV, but I essentially lose use of my iPad while it's playing. So not really ideal for all situations.
Yet again you insult people without any knowledge about them...
Most people on this fourm will understand where Apple is going and are happy to see the technology head in this direction.
It's obnoxious for you to suggest your knowledge and understanding is any further advanced than others posting here.
Apple's plan to lead the way into this new era is an exciting concept supported by most. The sales of their products prove this.
But to deny the user basic features to access their own data prior to implimenting a solid replacement for these needs is not forward thinking.
For this reason I believe the iPad fails to meet the markets true expectations and will limit how people use the device.
Ever heard of something called "AirPlay" from Apple? You drag and drop a video file from one device to another with a finger.
Because this is SOOOOO much more inefficient than booting into the directory and looking for the right file so you can then use an ancient copy/paste command to the other device after you've figured out which directory is appropriate for source and destination for each device, right?
Seriously, I see posts like yours and it is just plainly obvious that the paradigm shift represented in iOS is way, WAY over your head. Its so obvious to a whole generation but to those still firmly anchored in last gen tech its clearly an alien, incomprehensible way of doing things.
As already pointed out, there already exists an underlying file system. But its locked up (short of Jailbreaking) on purpose as exposure to it would simply create more problems than solutions to the intended audience of the iPad/iPhone, not to mention access to malicious developers who would attempt to exploit it for harm/amusement.
In real OS you could drop a file/movie to a video player application (for playing, and this includes DLNA applications), a different directory (for copying), a DVD-burning application (for making a DVD) etc.
I think you are way over your head trying to find an excuse for inexcusable limitation.
This is incorrect, you do not lose access to the iPad. You can actually AirPlay videos to your AppleTV through YouTube, the built in Videos app, and even Safari and use the iPad as usual. Some 3rd party apps do not (or can't) implement this correctly.
When I've tried to do this it's using AirVideo. The video stops playing if I try to use the iPad. The fact that YouTube, Safari, or even the built in videos app don't have this behavior is useless for what I want to do.
And?
Aaaaaand, this confusion invalidates your concern. As the poster above you just provided, Airplay doesn't prevent you from using your iPad for other things during use. AirVideo will.
No, because AirVideo is one of the only apps that allows me to do what I want. AirPlay on its own doesn't do anything.
Vidikron said:I can, for example, AirPlay a video from my iPad to my Apple TV, but I essentially lose use of my iPad while it's playing. So not really ideal for all situations.
No, because AirVideo is one of the only apps that allows me to do what I want. AirPlay on its own doesn't do anything.