Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
It sounds like the process that determines whether or not to throttle processor speeds relies solely on battery health, not on percentage of charge or if the device is plugged in.

That seems to be incorrect.
iPhone 7 users are reported being slowed down on ios 11.2.1 and their battery is still over 90% capacity.
The battery health thing is just an excuse.
 
Apple chose the easier - and secretive - software way of solving a problem that should have solved via different means - a battery recall, or some other definitive and non-consumer-harming solution that I'm not aware of - and even admitted it. Why keep defending Apple over something that's indefensible?
I distrusted iOS updates because of obvious performance reduction issues in the past. Now I distrust them even more. I don't disagree that's a problem that needs addressing. Do you want to address it with this software way? Fine. Do it. But give the users a choice. "Battery life will suffer if this CPU-performance-reducing feature isn't enabled. Your battery capacity has reduced significantly due to normal wear. Replace the battery for full speed and battery life."
That's it. No longer "guilty" of anything. It wasn't too hard. Instead, they chose the sneaky way and were called out on it.
 
And the vast majority of apple iPhone customers will merely think it's time for a new phone since they don't read tech news or go hang out in forums. And this is where apple will hit the jackpot. I sure hope it backfires on them. It's definitely worked to drive me away but alas I'm only one of millions.
 
All I’m saying is this: how did people for years deal with degrading batteries?

BY CHANGING THEM.

Have you ever heard of someone saying they’d prefer slowing down their CPU instead of getting a new battery?

What kind of fix is that???

———————————————————-

*********Essentially you’re left with TWO problems - a slow device AND a degraded battery****************

————————————————————-
 
At least people with dead phones would know what the issue with the phone is.

Instead people assume it's just the phone getting slow with iOS updates and figure the only solution is to buy a new one. Even if they got it checked by Apple techs, they'd report a "Healthy" battery not in need of change.

So who really benefits from this? ;)
You are assuming People are assuming based on that there really could be a battery issue. A whole lot of assuming going on.
 
Right on! The determining factor to how much energy a device will consume is almost always in software (i.e. running good code on slower hardware can, and most often, do, beat running poorly written code on fast cpu); the processor will draw whatever its power requirement given each process. 64bit/32bit refer to the available registers and has ZERO relation to power consumption, saying 64bit uses more energy is like saying 16 lane high way uses more energy than 2-lane country road.

Rubbish indeed!
Straw man indeed! Most of us know about 64 bits and “supposed efficiency in programming”. But may fail to realize something else may be at play.
 
Last edited:
You are assuming People are assuming based on that there really could be a battery issue. A whole lot of assuming going on.

People's phones are slowing down.

There's no reason to suspect the battery.

Even if people suspected the battery, the Apple techs will say it's "healthy" and does not need replacing. Yet it's still causing throttling.

The only cause to suspect is iOS updates and age.

Now some people might be aware that it could be the battery, no thanks to Apple who tried not to disclose this.
 
People's phones are slowing down.

There's no reason to suspect the battery.

Even if people suspected the battery, the Apple techs will say it's "healthy" and does not need replacing. Yet it's still causing throttling.

The only cause to suspect is iOS updates and age.

Now some people might be aware that it could be the battery, no thanks to Apple who tried not to disclose this.

No, it's the battery.

My iPhone 6 had a battery replacement last week. It's now verifiably benchmarking twice as fast as it was a week ago with a 3 year old battery with 500+ cycles on it. It's also much more responsive in general use and back to the performance it had when new.
 
No, it's the battery.

My iPhone 6 had a battery replacement last week. It's now verifiably benchmarking twice as fast as it was a week ago with a 3 year old battery with 500+ cycles on it. It's also much more responsive in general use and back to the performance it had when new.

Yes I know it's the battery. That's my whole point. :p

The issue is nobody would know it's the battery causing throttling (until now, that is -- if they catch it in the news and read+understand it).
 
No, it's the battery.

My iPhone 6 had a battery replacement last week. It's now verifiably benchmarking twice as fast as it was a week ago with a 3 year old battery with 500+ cycles on it. It's also much more responsive in general use and back to the performance it had when new.

I’m so glad people are finding this out so we can find ways to keep our devices pretty much as good as the day we shelled out ~1000 bucks for them.

I’m looking forward to milking my iPhone 8 for all it’s worth. I got the att 256 gb version with Apple care and I believe there was also a 10% tax I paid. I also bought cases. So I except this thing to last and perform well. I could’ve bought a computer for the kind of money I spent on this phone.

I’m not buying the latest iPhone out of spite at this point unless Apple reverses this ludicrous feature or does something.
 
Say hello to the future. Throttling.

Screen Shot 2017-12-21 at 3.35.18 PM.png
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.