Interesting response - agree and disagree.
I don't know about that. In the end the user either accepts the interface or he doesn't. Of course there is a lot more to acceptance than the interface as AIR demonstrates. The Tablet could flop simply because Apple doesn't get the I/O right. That is if you accept that AIR flopped more for what it didn't offer rather than for what it did.
Now if Apple does a 180 and puts an Intel processor in the tablet then all bets are off. I don't think that will happen though because the only way to get enough processors into the tablet, to do the job, is via ARM processors. Cites and parallel processing will make the Tablet hum.
Dave
I'd rather see Apple fix the mistakes they made with AIR because right now it should be an embarrassment. The unfortunate thing here is that tablets can't replace laptops. The use cases aren't interchangable.A number of things to consider here.
One. The Macbook Air has not been refreshed in a while which could mean that the tablet is its replacement.
That is BS as many iPhone apps could run fine on a tablet right now. The provisions for higher resolution displays is already built into the SDK. Of course some won't but that happens with any hardware/software revision. The biggest problem areas are likely to be graphics intensive games. Given that there would be fewer issues than trying to run kegacy Mac IS apps on the thing. Plus if it runs ARM you really wouldn't want Mac OS on the thing for marketing reasons.Two. The tablet, if released now, will need to be running full OS X since there would be no lead time for software development.
(Notice I said release and not announce)
It is beginning to sound like Apple has put a lot of work into this device. As such I've imagined a number of possibilities all of which work to minimize the chance of running Mac OS on the tablet. In any event think about the development issues here, with iPhone OS as the base for the interface you can innovate without pissing off a large number of users or developers.Three. If this device includes full OS X, it will need a completely new way of interacting with the screen which combines touch capability while giving the user complete point and click control they are used to with a mouse.
Why? If it is an ARM based machine why not run the apps as is? I'm not convinced that windowing iPhone apps is required but it certainly could be offered as an option. The reality is the app owning screen metaphor works well with Touch tablets.Think finger motion tracking over the display with pressure click sensitivity.
I also believe that there is the possibility that Apple will include a software version of the iPhone or iPod Touch interface where you could run a large number of the touch apps inside of this environment.
Lastly, it is my firm belief that Apple has been grooming us for some time now for the use of an on screen keyboard given how the most recent keyboards are now all flat.
I don't know about that. In the end the user either accepts the interface or he doesn't. Of course there is a lot more to acceptance than the interface as AIR demonstrates. The Tablet could flop simply because Apple doesn't get the I/O right. That is if you accept that AIR flopped more for what it didn't offer rather than for what it did.
Now if Apple does a 180 and puts an Intel processor in the tablet then all bets are off. I don't think that will happen though because the only way to get enough processors into the tablet, to do the job, is via ARM processors. Cites and parallel processing will make the Tablet hum.
Dave