Are you serious? 3 years waiting for that?
Please, if you don't have nothing to post, just DON'T post.
Thanks.
You have something stuck somewhere ?
Are you serious? 3 years waiting for that?
Please, if you don't have nothing to post, just DON'T post.
Thanks.
But there is a CDMA iPhone in China, lacking WiFi though. Perfect for Verizon I suppose.
Incorrect, there is no difference in the cellular components for the Chinese version. It only lacks Wi-Fi.
All 3G iPhones use UMTS-WCDMA not CDMA2000
Is Steve Jobs trying to kill the iPad in its first run? First confirmation the price will go down in short order and now this? Why would anyone buy the first run now?
Totally agree with you on that one. They want to limit the number of features they bring out at once too . . . I think I'll wait until the second gen of iPad's come out, personally.
Im sure youre being sarcastic but on my iPhone AND MacBook Pro I can listen to any radio station anywhere in the world. Makes a radio seem outdated.
I think the term revolutionary is exactly what Apple is. Especially in marketing.
Yes it does. It needs to pass FCC regulation. And the FCC won't allow Apple to "surprise" a camera on the market last minute either.
P-Worm
If Apple decided to change the name from iPad to anything else it would sell better imho.
If Apple decided to change the name from iPad to anything else it would sell better imho.
Listening to radio streaming is not exactly the same as listening to the radio, is it? Without internet connection, you cannot do it. Not all radio stations are available for streaming either. It is a bit like explaining the lack of Blu Ray on Macs like "but you can watch those films on download". Yes, but it's not the same. The audio is worse, the resolution is worse, it's a completely different format.
About the revolutionary marketing... I wonder, how that revolutionary marketing will set out the introduction of radio to iPods and the iPhone. I think or rather I hope that it is inevitable now. Everything has radio, absolutely everything. I bet that my socks can find BBC Radio 4.
Don't drop the price put the right features in and people will buy! Gives is our front facing video cam that we won't use!
Pretty sure that the statement about Apple being "nimble" with the price is more to assure content and app providers that Apple is going to do what is required to make the iPad a success. People here can and should read into that statement what they want, but I just can't see Apple making it for any other reason.
If Apple decided to change the name from iPad to anything else it would sell better imho.
well here go one of the Steve Jobs quotes...`
You can't just ask customers what they want and then try to give that to them. By the time you get it built, they'll want something new.
No matter what apple produce, people will just continue to ask for more....
same like the iPhone, till date which still got people claiming they want keyboad.
what the hell is an i-Pod anyway?
The name iPod was proposed by Vinnie Chieco, a freelance copywriter, who (with others) was called by Apple to figure out how to introduce the new player to the public. After Chieco saw a prototype, he thought of the movie 2001: A Space Odyssey and the phrase "Open the pod bay door, Hal!", which refers to the white EVA Pods of the Discovery One spaceship.[3] Apple researched the trademark and found that it was already in use. Joseph N. Grasso of New Jersey had originally listed an "iPod" trademark with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) in July 2000 for Internet kiosks. The first iPod kiosks had been demonstrated to the public in New Jersey in March 1998, and commercial use began in January 2000, but had apparently been discontinued by 2001. The trademark was registered by the USPTO in November 2003, and Grasso assigned it to Apple Computer, Inc. in 2005.[7]