Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
SDXC vs. Expresscard

I've been using an SSD expresscard as my boot drive in my old 15" MBP and it's fantastic. Does anyone know if the 15" can boot from the SDXC slot and if so does that even make sense from a performance perspective?
 
Here's my new machine. Can't wait!

2.2GHz Quad-core Intel Core i7
8GB 1333MHz DDR3 SDRAM - 2x4GB
256GB Solid State Drive
8x Double-Layer SuperDrive
MBP 15"HR Antiglare WS Display

Ships: 1 - 3 business days
Delivers: Feb 28 - Mar 4 by 2-3 day shipping
:D:D:D:D

Apple got another one to buy their overpriced RAM and SSD's.
 
Still Focused on what the HD 3000 can do on 13"

Contrary to the GMA HD, Intel HD Graphics 3000 is directly integrated in the processor core of the Sandy-Bridge processors. Alike its predecessor it does not have a dedicated graphics memory, but, can access the Level-3 cache of the CPU (which is now called 'Last Level Cache' - LLC) of up to 8 MB, depending on the CPU. Further memory requirements are covered by accessing the RAM of the computer.

Alike the actual cores of the CPU, the integrated HD Graphics 3000 can dynamically adjust its clock rate upon increased load (Turbo Boost). However, some processors of the Sandy-Bridge family handle this feature differently. E.g., the clock rates range from 650 MHz to a maximum of 1300 MHz in the new i5/i7-2X20 or i5/i7-2X40 M/QM/XM processors, while the i3-2310M and also the i7-2630QM use a clock rate between 650 and 1100 MHz and the i5-2410M and the i7-2635QM between 650-1200 and are therewith lower clocked. ULV processors, e.g., the i7-2617M have an even lower clock rate of 350 to 900MHz, so, the performance should drop accordingly. The Intel HD Graphics 3000 has 12 Execution Units (comparable to pipelines). Despite the same number than in the GMA HD, they have been improved and are now clearly faster than in the predecessor.

Furthermore, the HD Graphics 3000 got a unit dedicated to decoding and encoding of HD videos. In addition it supports DirectX 10.1, Shader Model 4.1 and HDMI 1.4 (support of 3D displays). Just like the whole CPU also the graphics unit is manufactured in 32-nanometer lithography

Source: http://www.notebookcheck.net/Review-Intel-HD-Graphics-3000-graphics-solution.43710.0.html

Which CPU does the 13" MBP low end use?
 
thanks everyone, for answering my lay questions.

One more. My ancient 15" MBP has 1440 x 900. But I'm planning on a 13" this time, and technically, isn't 1280 x 800 on a 13" actually a bit MORE resolution?

I've also got tired old eyes, and I've heard that 1440 x 900 (were I to wait for it or get an air now) on a 13" can be hard to read. If so, can I assume the main benefit of higher resolution is watching video or looking at photos?

Thanks again for your help.
 
thank you :)
I'm going with 8gb ddr3, 2.2 and antiglare.
I still have doubts about the HD... the question is: do I maintain the warranty if I replace by myself the existing HDD with a SSD?

My exact setup.

In the mid-2010 User-Guide for a 15in Macbook Pro Apple gives detailed step-by-step on how to swap hard drives, and then states towards the end: "Your MacBook Pro does not have any user-serviceable parts, except the hard drive and the memory."

http://manuals.info.apple.com/en_US/MacBook_Pro_15inch_Mid2010.pdf

You may want to verify this, but I believe the HD is replaceable without voiding warranty. There is a lot of misinformation floating around on this topic.
 
I think the updates are good overall.. and I think a few people who are saying about the 15"-17" incremental upgrades are being a bit dismissive.. 2 more cores and sandy bridge, it will be very tangible - at least for power users.

Unfortunately where they lost me big time was the 13"

That's the machine I want, everything is fine with it.. except 1280. If they put the air at 1440, the 13 should have an option for 1440 with antiglare.

I've been waiting and waiting for a 12" powerbook replacement.. but with the specs more toward the mbp than mba.. the mba isn't fast enough, and the 13" has a low res which won't cut it..so no 13"

I'll heavily weigh my options on the 15" - but it's not what I really want.. and my mid 07 is getting long in the tooth.

#bymom - you wouldn't' want 1440 on a 13" with 'tired eyes' if you type from arms length I think. I'm 34 with glasses.. and found the 11" mba too high res for me, but the 13" fine.. I think if I was older I'd consider the lower res or moving to a 15"
 
thanks everyone, for answering my lay questions.

One more. My ancient 15" MBP has 1440 x 900. But I'm planning on a 13" this time, and technically, isn't 1280 x 800 on a 13" actually a bit MORE resolution?

It's less, whatever way you look at it.

You should be quite comfy going from 1440 x 900 on a 15" to a 13" though.
 
:rolleyes:
Don't try to run Flash video on any of these new MBPs, you'll be very disappointed :

http://developer.apple.com/library/mac/#technotes/tn2010/tn2267.html



Apple have yet to announce any Intel or ATI support for the framework that Flash uses to hardware decode its video for playback. Note this is the same Framework that players like VLC/Mplayer are implementing.
Easily overlooked but quite important. We might never see that support outside of nVidia GPUs.

Interesting how they conveniently left the HD 3000 vs. nVidia 320M comparison off the performance page. They only compare the new ATI over the old discrete nVidia.
It never happened of course.
 
It's only $2,179.00 in the education store..

Either way, these prices are stupid. I was really looking forward to buying my first macbook pro today, but these prices are not persuasive enough. I was really hoping to see a $100-$200 drop in price, or at least the same price, not an increase! And now that the other rumor came out yesterday about the "milestone" redesign next year, I really can't justify spending the money right now.

You really shouldn't base your buying decisions off of rumors. You're just setting yourself up for disappointment next year. Besides, the prices in the MBPs have almost never changed. It used to be that the base 15" was $2000! :cool:

I'm very tempted to replace my 2007 MBP with the low-end 15" released today, but 256 MB VRAM just doesn't do it, and I'm not set on spending $400 more to fix that. Of course, with OS X Lion just around the corner, it seems silly to buy now unless you really need it.

Anyone know how hard it is to replace the HDD in the new Unibody laptops? It was a bitch-and-a-half to replace mine in the previous generation, and Apple seems stuck on providing slow 5400 RPM drives standard.
 
Was considering buying a Macbook Pro, but this update is a bit underwhelming, the price of the 15" is mental, I would want the upper 15" version as I wouldn't bother with the 256mb GFX card, that might have been considered decent in 2007.

The thunder bolt thing is not something I care about, but the processor update is good, just not worth the money. Might wait until 2012 when the refresh happens.
 
their is an anti-glare option for the 15" mbp

The anti-glare used to be standard and rightly so, now it's a $200 upgrade. WTF!?

Those prices are ridonculous. My 2007 MacBook Pro has been dead for 6 months, but I can't find the strength to buy this. I love Mac OS X, but that premium is too high.
 
This update needed to be better to convince me to ditch my 2006 MBP. The high res display needs to be standard, and the price for the 256GB SSD needs to be cut in half (I'd prefer it be standard as well). I am never again buying another computer with a traditional hard drive in it, i'm sick and tired of the poor performance and the noise.

Battery life should be at 10 hours.
 
Ordered mine too:

2.2GHz Quad-core Intel Core i7
4GB 1333MHz DDR3 SDRAM - 2x2GB
750GB Serial ATA Drive @ 5400 rpm
SuperDrive 8x (DVD±R DL/DVD±RW/CD-RW)
MacBook Pro 15-inch Hi-Res Anti-Glare Widescreen Display
Backlit Keyboard (English) & User's Guide

With a nice discount courtesy of my Company's EPP

I will also be geting a memory upgrade from Crucial, upping it to 8GB.

Happy days.

Bottleneck will be that 5400RPM drive...
 
So how long do you think it will be before Apple drops their old-model refurb prices. A 15" with HR/AG Core i5 is only 15% off. If it went 30-35% off, I think I'd just go for that. Better battery, and a higher-clocked CPU for the 90% of single or dual-threaded apps I use. And the 330M is about equal to the lowend GPU on the new ones. I can't afford $2000+ for the high end.
 
LOL, money i saved i'll be able to buy a better product then the MBP. PLus your missing the point, other companies OUT their use the same companies, let me break it down for you, intel? amd? hello?

Let me break it down to what really matters: OS X.
 
I just have to say that for users like me who are reentering the MBP market, especially looking to make power desktop use portable, this update makes a lot of sense. Quad cores on the high end and the ability to upgrade RAM and SSD at relatively decent pricing convinced me to replace my desktop with the 17". For those of you who just bought an MBP a year or two ago, this may not be the update you were looking for, but for those of us who haven't had a high end laptop since they were powerbooks, this is a great opportunity. Apple knew this.

So if you are one of the many complainers on this forum, think for a second that apple wasn't after your business, they were after mine. They will wait until next year for yours.
 
Is it me or do others feel that $1200 for the bottom of the barrel Apple laptop is still wicked expensive? And that's a 13" screen. The 15" screen laptops start at $1800. Will Apple ever sell a laptop that is priced well below $1000?

I cannot fork over these kinds of payments for a laptop computer that will be matched by any other $500+ laptop doing the same things that 90% of consumers do these days (web surf, email, facebook, photo uploads, MS Office, skype, online bill pay, etc). Sure, maybe for very specific apps like Photoshop or Premiere a particular Macbook may be needed. Sure, if you have a 5 year old Macbook and hate PCs, you're willing to do an upgrade now.

I own Macs and I own PCs...but I was really looking forward to a $800 or $900 Mac laptop someday.


You can get an 11" Macbook Air in the refurb store for $849

http://store.apple.com/us/product/FC505LL/A?mco=MjEwNTg3NDQ

I see there are 13 MBP for $999.
 
They couldn't have offered 512MB of GDDR5 on the entry level 15"?

We go from 256MB to 1GB?

Yeah, that's the only thing that bothers me about this refresh... no 512MB?! Quite the cost to the 1GB, too. Not sure my First Lady will let me go for that upgrade... guess it's the stock model for me! Thanks, babe!!

I must add that the rumors about dedicated SSD for system files, larger trackpad, etc., were hilarious... quite the source of entertainment!
 
Last edited:
a bit disappointed i must say... well, i'm not upgrading my mbp 13 late 2009 then.

let's hope that 2012 refresh will bring what we've read recently:

13" - 1440 x 900
16GB SSD for system
larger touchpad
new design
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.