Yes, this would be amazing. Pods to match ‘midnight green’, or ‘pacific blue’ would be great. Or even space gray.They can put an ox on them put they can't produce a few cool colors like Colorware? JHC.
Yes, this would be amazing. Pods to match ‘midnight green’, or ‘pacific blue’ would be great. Or even space gray.They can put an ox on them put they can't produce a few cool colors like Colorware? JHC.
The year of the Ox only comes once every 12 years.
1961, 1973, 1985, 1997, 2009, 2021, 2033
For sure you have a point on this. What I see is just a MKT strategy that intends to incentive sales among Chinese consumers that feel connected with the Chinese zodiac. This year we may be talking of people born or married (for instance) in prior Ox years (1937, 1949, 1961, 1973, 1985, 1997, 2009) as well as those Chinese people that find significant 2021 current Ox year. So I don’t have any doubt this could be a good strategy to appeal a good bunch of people.There is zero tradition in Western countries in displaying Christmas/Hannukah symbols outside of a short holiday timeframe.
By contrast, in many Asian countries, the zodiac figure is the dominant symbol for that particular year. Many households have a small display of the current year's animal.
Note that essentially 1/12th of those who follow the Chinese zodiac call this their year. The Western astrological calendar is split into twelve month-long periods that don't coincide with calendar months.
I, for one, can't support any particular support of Chinese culture over any other culture. Why is this special?
Speaking from the stance of market(s) -
"According to November data from Counterpoint Research, Apple had just 8 percent of the market share in China during the third quarter of 2019, down from 9 percent during the same time period in 2018. Huawei is the market leader with a 40 percent share, trailed by Vivo, Oppo and Xiomi"
As an AAPL holder since 1999, I don't really care about this. I do care about market diversification - manufacturing efficiencies, and an edge over competitors in emergent markets and unrealized spaces. This, to me, looks like some kind of appeasement. Does the combined tax+labour offset in China really impact your COG to such an extent that China, your *minority* market gets special and highly unique branding?
What shareholders, like myself, should be asking is:
1) AAPL has decided to fab their own SOC architecture. Amazing, brilliant, and yes. Get out of the fake, and agreed-upon (typical of binary market competition) BS that INTEL vs AMD has been suggesting is the 'reality' of progress.
2) Then, given the performance and efficiency gains made across the line (energy storage, power, savings via processing improvements with respect to the last two parameters, and others), what -> presently <- are your COG and related factors which mandate you manufacture in China. Why not U.S.? Why not Peru, Ireland, Ukraine, or (?)
3) And how does the latter justify AAPL kissing *** for a country that represent a (yes, significant opportunity) market that simply is neither sticky with respect to their products nor an actual first-runner adopter - unless the basic physical features are trendy.
This is marketing department trying to gain market share in China and other Asian countries that celebrate the Lunar New Year. There are a few competing chinese companies that if you put together or Huawei alone, Apple want to find ways to gain market share. If I was a shareholder, I wouldn't be concerned as long as the profits continue either constant or preferably increasing.I, for one, can't support any particular support of Chinese culture over any other culture. Why is this special?
Maybe because, unlike so many other cultures, half the Chinese are not going to start whining "cultural appropriation" the first time any company tries to make something specific to their culture?I, for one, can't support any particular support of Chinese culture over any other culture. Why is this special?
My takeaway from this is that WeChat is the primary form ofcorporate-to-consumercommunication in China.
Your ego bruised? 😂At the end of the day business I business I guess, and Apple have to suck China’s ... , I mean find creative ways of appeasing their overlords ..., I mean use any means necessary to sell more in the planet’s biggest market.
They do, they lobby and sabotage Huawei.Apple's China PR team seems to do cool stuff. The Japan PR team also seems to do cool events. Does the US PR team ever do anything interesting?
You mean “gamble bags”? 😂This is less about China, and more about being 'cultural'. In Japan, they have a tradition of people buying 'surprise bags' (I don't remember the actual name for them) and in past years Apple has participated, and some of the things people find in the fixed price bags are really incredibly expensive, for the price paid. Ipads, MacBooks, ear buds, software, and charging cables, and other accessories.
That’s what makes it special. 1 in every 12 people belongs to the year of OX. (Your birth year determines your zodiac)The year of the Ox only comes once every 12 years.
1961, 1973, 1985, 1997, 2009, 2021, 2033
Who’s also salty but not from US?LMAO You Guys??? And where are you from? Because according to this forum of mixed countries when the U.S Black Friday is about to approach every other country on Macrumors suddenly feels entitled to a Black Friday deal from Apple, and many of them don't even know what Black Friday means or how it came about being on Friday. SMH.
Budget and manufacturing engineering.Yes, this would be amazing. Pods to match ‘midnight green’, or ‘pacific blue’ would be great. Or even space gray.
I, for one, can't support any particular support of Chinese culture over any other culture. Why is this special?
Speaking from the stance of market(s) -
"According to November data from Counterpoint Research, Apple had just 8 percent of the market share in China during the third quarter of 2019, down from 9 percent during the same time period in 2018. Huawei is the market leader with a 40 percent share, trailed by Vivo, Oppo and Xiomi"
As an AAPL holder since 1999, I don't really care about this. I do care about market diversification - manufacturing efficiencies, and an edge over competitors in emergent markets and unrealized spaces. This, to me, looks like some kind of appeasement. Does the combined tax+labour offset in China really impact your COG to such an extent that China, your *minority* market gets special and highly unique branding?
What shareholders, like myself, should be asking is:
1) AAPL has decided to fab their own SOC architecture. Amazing, brilliant, and yes. Get out of the fake, and agreed-upon (typical of binary market competition) BS that INTEL vs AMD has been suggesting is the 'reality' of progress.
2) Then, given the performance and efficiency gains made across the line (energy storage, power, savings via processing improvements with respect to the last two parameters, and others), what -> presently <- are your COG and related factors which mandate you manufacture in China. Why not U.S.? Why not Peru, Ireland, Ukraine, or (?)
3) And how does the latter justify AAPL kissing *** for a country that represent a (yes, significant opportunity) market that simply is neither sticky with respect to their products nor an actual first-runner adopter - unless the basic physical features are trendy.
He doesn’t want money from people he hate with a passion.Since you are an AAPL holder, it’s supposed that one of your primary goals is to make more money, so with all respect, I don’t even catch why you feel so bothered with a simple and harmless MKT strategy, which for sure intends to incentive sales in a given certain region of the world (prejudices apart), strategy that eventually would make more money for you. Maybe you should be more practical and business driven. 😉
He doesn’t want money from people he hate with a passion.
Also he probably only holds like 1/1000 of a share through ETF or 401k
Agree with you 100%. But still the question would be, why somebody would hate with passion people that not even know?
Is a crazy world.
Our world for sure would be a better world without that stupid prejudices.
- Identity issue, ego, and perceived threat
- Established power vs rising power
- Perceived cultural dominance eroding
- World becomes more foreign to him, causing discomfort
- “Me first” entitlement
- In-group preference (vs. alien/Asians)
- Fear of missing out
- etc...
Sell your AAPL shares if you want to complain about them catering to China. I already have.I, for one, can't support any particular support of Chinese culture over any other culture. Why is this special?
Speaking from the stance of market(s) -
"According to November data from Counterpoint Research, Apple had just 8 percent of the market share in China during the third quarter of 2019, down from 9 percent during the same time period in 2018. Huawei is the market leader with a 40 percent share, trailed by Vivo, Oppo and Xiomi"
As an AAPL holder since 1999, I don't really care about this. I do care about market diversification - manufacturing efficiencies, and an edge over competitors in emergent markets and unrealized spaces. This, to me, looks like some kind of appeasement. Does the combined tax+labour offset in China really impact your COG to such an extent that China, your *minority* market gets special and highly unique branding?
What shareholders, like myself, should be asking is:
1) AAPL has decided to fab their own SOC architecture. Amazing, brilliant, and yes. Get out of the fake, and agreed-upon (typical of binary market competition) BS that INTEL vs AMD has been suggesting is the 'reality' of progress.
2) Then, given the performance and efficiency gains made across the line (energy storage, power, savings via processing improvements with respect to the last two parameters, and others), what -> presently <- are your COG and related factors which mandate you manufacture in China. Why not U.S.? Why not Peru, Ireland, Ukraine, or (?)
3) And how does the latter justify AAPL kissing *** for a country that represent a (yes, significant opportunity) market that simply is neither sticky with respect to their products nor an actual first-runner adopter - unless the basic physical features are trendy.
It's the year of SOMETHING every single year. This is a ridiculous argument.The year of the Ox only comes once every 12 years.
1961, 1973, 1985, 1997, 2009, 2021, 2033