Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I have to think Apple is "fine" with what Gurman does ... they probably sort of "use him" to float things and have a bit of soft control of narratives out there.

He's way too prominent, and for too long now, for them not to be mostly ok with him and what he puts out there
 
FYI, some leaks are unofficially sanctioned by Apple to gauges interest in new ideas. More importantly, it gets people talking.

Probably same with every MR members. Why else would we subscribe to a "rumors" website and comment on the "rumors" threads?
I would guess the only time Apple leaks stuff on purpose is when the rumors start getting way too unrealistic and the reality would only be disappointing, or for damage control such as that one Apple exec recently getting assigned to clean up Siri.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: psxp


Last year, we reported that Apple sued its former software engineer Andrew Aude for providing journalists with confidential information about the company's future plans, including details about the Journal app, Vision Pro headset, and more.

Apple-Leak-Feature.jpg

As reported by 9to5Mac, the Superior Court of Santa Clara County on Thursday dismissed the lawsuit after Apple and Aude reached an agreement to resolve this matter. The court document for the case's dismissal does not provide any specific details about the agreement, but Aude issued a public apology on the same day.

In a post on social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter, Aude said leaking information was a "profound and expensive mistake."

Aude's full apology:Aude joined Apple in 2016, to work on optimizing battery performance, and the company fired him in 2023 after learning of his wrongful disclosures. For more details about the situation, read our previous coverage of the lawsuit.

Article Link: Apple Leaker Issues Apology: 'Profound and Expensive Mistake'
Anyone who has worked for Apple will tell you that loss prevention is taken *incredibly* seriously. The sums of money at stake are astronomical.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: Grigori Wulfric
It's not illegal to write rumors.
But it’s technically illegal to write about unannounced products which information you got from an insider. Or maybe it’s not illegal when you work for the media but I’m sure it’s unethical. I worked for several big high tech companies and in our training it was made very clear to us that if we learned about unannounced competitive products we needed to treat that information as if we didn’t know about it. Us using it to our advantage would have been illegal and ground for termination.
 
Remember years ago when Gizmodo leaked a new iPhone when they found a prototype in a bar and what happened to them?
Steve personally harassed Jason Chen, the editor at Gizmodo, then AFTER Jason gave the phone back, Apple had police raid his home, confiscating computers, hard drives, phones, etc.

Apple has always been very petty about these kinds of things, but I can't really blame them when leaks can damage their current sales, future marketing plans, and gives the competition a blueprint of what they're working on.
 
Remember years ago when Gizmodo leaked a new iPhone when they found a prototype in a bar and what happened to them?

Yea, bu it was a bit different. The two men who found the phone and sold it wound up with probation, which makes sense because they knew the phone was lost and trying to sell it is a crime under CA law. Gizmodo was never indicted but Apple sure put them through the wringer.
 
Somewhat ironic that we’re all reading this on an forum that relies on leakers. I wish this guy well in the future. He committed a crime but it shouldn’t ruin the rest of his life.
It did ruin the rest of his life. No company will hire this guy knowing he can’t be trusted with confidential or proprietary information. No second chances when you screw up this big. He’ll be stocking shelves at the local grocery store or flipping burgers at Freddy’s for the rest of his life.
 
He'll never work for a decent company again. That's for sure.



"Why you left Apple?"

"I stole data and sold it"

"Thanks, well keep in touch".
 
  • Angry
Reactions: Grigori Wulfric
Well, Apple literally can’t go after journalists. That’s why Gurman joined Bloomberg to get protected.

As for Kuo, what is Apple going to do to Luxshare and Foxconn - blacklist them for leaking?
well, Apple's suppliers are under contractual agreements/NDAs to not disclose certain information, so, if/when Apple finds out that a specific leak came from an employee at a certain supplier, they can and most likely will go after them.
At the same token, Kuo is smart enough to not word his leaks in such a way ...
 
there certainly is more to the story than what we are being fed here. Apple are the ones who sued this guy so for them to settle, they must be satisfied with the outcome.
 
I suppose it's easier for Apple to go after the leakers than the people (e.g. Mark Gurman, Ming-Chi Kuo, etc) who write about the leaked info.
Apple punishing an employee who violates an employment contract by leaking confidential information is legal while pursuing journalists might be difficult as they would claim Apple was violating their First Amendment right.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.