Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I'm hoping you're right. It'd suck if my watch band collection is suddenly incompatible with the new Apple Watches.

Hopefully yes it's just a name change and not a size one - if not ... anyone got a SS black S3 they don't want?!?!
 
  • Like
Reactions: anthonymoody



Apple is facing a series of leaks in the hours ahead of its "Gather Round" event at Apple Park in Cupertino, California, and this time information about the new version of Apple Watch has been revealed. According to AllThingsHow, Apple udpated its sitemap files ahead of the event, which included links to Apple Watch in new 40mm and 44mm sizes.

applewatchseries4leakedimage.jpg

These are believed to be the new Apple Watch models about to be announced later today, although they don't carry a "Series 4" designation in the sitemap and are simply called "Apple Watch." The sizes include both GPS and GPS + Cellular configurations, and include the colors Silver, Space Gray, and Gold.

In 40mm, there's also a few Nike and Hermès options. Hermès includes an Indigo Craie Orange Double Tour band with a Stainless Steel case, and Nike has Pure Platinum Black Sport Band, Summit White Sport Loop, Anthracite Black Sport Band, and Black Sport Loop paired with various aluminum cases.

apple-sitemap-apple-watch.jpg

These new sizes appear to be upgrades from the previous generation of case sizes, with Apple increasing the cases from 38mm to 40mm for the small size and from 42mm to 44mm for the large size. Apple measures these cases vertically. In terms of width, the current 38mm Apple Watch is 33.3mm wide and the 42mm Apple Watch is 35.9mm wide.

The 40mm and 44mm sizes roughly align with a prediction made by analyst Ming-Chi Kuo in July, who stated Apple would reveal two models measuring in at around 39.9mm and 45.2mm.

The upcoming Apple Watch's big new feature will be a display that's 15 percent larger, thanks to reduced bezels and likely the slightly increased case size. In a leak a few weeks back, we got a glimpse at a new watch face for Apple Watch, including one that had space for as many as eight complications.

Article Link: Apple Leaks New Apple Watch Sizes Coming in 40mm and 44mm
[doublepost=1536762860][/doublepost]i'm excited about bigger watches, usually means either more features or better battery life or both!
 
  • Like
Reactions: BuddyTronic
Looking at the full link to the XML, there is a 44mm SS silver and SS gold. I cant see any reference to black SS, though my eyes are worn out from the scrolling :)


EDIT: I lie, Space Black is there. Interestingly S3 still on the list, but no SS S3 - aluminum only.
 
Okay, so I've added an image to go along with my thoughts this morning. As you can see, when you scale up the display, the top and bottom bezels are narrower than the sides. They added 2mm to account for this. Also they may have scaled the PPI up slightly so that the new display might not actually be this large as shown below. But this demonstrates the concept I was talking about earlier.

apple-watch-display-scale.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Reach9
I want to buy the LTE version in case I want it in the future, but I don't want it to affect battery life. If I disable LTE on the Apple Watch, does it then have a zero effect on battery life?
 
IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT

I WAS WRONG ABOUT THERE NOT BEING A 44mm SS WATCH. I AM DUMB AND DID NOT REALIZE WHAT I WAS LOOKING AT WAS A PARTIAL SCREENSHOT OF THE PRODUCT LIST.

I APOLOGIZE PROFUSELY TO ALL OF YOU. I AM SORRY. YOU WERE RIGHT. I WAS WRONG. I WAS WRONG I WAS WRONG I WAS WRONG I WAS WRONG I AM A LOSER AND HATE MYSELF
 
The comparison page refers the display sizes for the 38mm and 42mm watches.
The cases will be 2mm larger in height.

Yes. I posted this graphic last week based on the rumored pixel sizes. Note the new pixel dimensions would not fit in the original case (RED), and create an asymmetry with the bezel. So, I hypothesized that the case dimensions would not change as they would round the corners, and slightly widen the aspect ratio (ORANGE) keeping the original bezel symmetry. Instead it appears Apple has increased the height of the case which would take care of the original problem, while keeping the design symmetrical. I had not considered Apple would change the dimensions of the case justifying the cost to retool as something that would give Apple extra room inside the case, if for nothing else a larger battery. The white overlay in the center represents the original watch display area.

44473177092_20995caa8e_o.jpg


I find this inconclusive. Yes height is approx. 38 - 42mm, but so is diagonal screen size :

From https://www.sizescreens.com/apple-watch-series-3-screen-specifications/ :

Yes, but displays are referenced in pixels, the case is referenced in mm — like all watches. While there’s an outside chance they’re referring to diagonal screen measurements, most likely they are referring to case measurements.
 
Last edited:

I find this inconclusive. Yes height is approx. 38 - 42mm, but so is diagonal screen size :

From https://www.sizescreens.com/apple-watch-series-3-screen-specifications/ :

The Apple Watch Series 3 screen has a 1.5-inch (38mm) or 1.65-inch (42mm) size with resolution 340 × 272 px or 390 × 312 px respectively. The Aspect ratio of a screen is 5:4. The pixel density is equal to 290 pixels or 303 pixels per inch (PPI) respectively to screen size. Apple Watch Series 3 screen based on OLED technology and able to reproduce 16,777,216 colors with the color of depth – 24 bits. The screen is covered by Ion-X strengthened glass protection glass in the Aluminum case and Sapphire crystal glass in Stainless steel case.
 
Until I see a 44mm SS model listed on an apple product page, i’m operating under the assumption that leaked list is complete. If that makes me dumb and I should kill myself, well....so be it.
You were looking at a partial screenshot where the SS versions were below the fold. AllThingsHow's cached Apple sitemap shows the 42mm SS versions.
 

Attachments

  • 2FDD00AD-26F0-4E37-BDE4-65B4DF1EDD46.png
    2FDD00AD-26F0-4E37-BDE4-65B4DF1EDD46.png
    750.5 KB · Views: 118
I stand corrected, per a previous post. And, yes, I'm an idiot, and should put a gun in a my mouth, pull the trigger, and commit suicide. I profusely apologize to everyone in the MR forums for ever being born.

You are better than me, and I'm a loser, and don't deserve to live. You win.

There really are a lot of sanctimonious asshats on this site. I'm glad you guys are so hyper-fing-perfect and never make mistakes. You're really lucky, I guess! Jesus h christ.

IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT

I WAS WRONG ABOUT THERE NOT BEING A 44mm SS WATCH. I AM DUMB AND DID NOT REALIZE WHAT I WAS LOOKING AT WAS A PARTIAL SCREENSHOT OF THE PRODUCT LIST.

I APOLOGIZE PROFUSELY TO ALL OF YOU. I AM SORRY. YOU WERE RIGHT. I WAS WRONG. I WAS WRONG I WAS WRONG I WAS WRONG I WAS WRONG I AM A LOSER AND HATE MYSELF
Holy overreaction Batman!
 
You were looking at a partial screenshot where the SS versions were below the fold. AllThingsHow's cached Apple sitemap shows the 42mm SS versions.

oh my god. YES I ***** KNOW.

Anyone else?
Holy overreaction Batman!

Then everybody shut up about it. I got my mistake the first five times it was pointed out by all of the alphas here. Christ. And yes, all of your penises are larger.
 
oh my god. YES I ***** KNOW.

Anyone else?


Then everybody shut up about it. I got my mistake the first five times it was pointed out by all of the alphas here. Christ. And yes, all of your penises are larger.
Until the forum software updates each post with an inline reply count, readers are going to reply without the knowledge of previous replies.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.