Why are people so sure that we'll never see a 970 in a portable.
If it's true that the 970 will be in the desktops, then it's almost a given that it will follow in the portables, as every chip in the past has on a Mac.
The only way I see a 970 NOT making it into a portable as such, is if Apple/IMB have developed a portable version of the chip - imagine 970-M type thing. It would have a different name but be essentially the same chip.
Apple has a small market share, and that means they have a relatively small developer base. It's always been in their best interest to have a product line that is easy and convenient to develop software/hardware for.
The new chip needs to be an easy transition for developers who currently have G3/G4 optimised products. Adding a different chip to the portables might confuse that situation even more.
If it's true that the 970 will be in the desktops, then it's almost a given that it will follow in the portables, as every chip in the past has on a Mac.
The only way I see a 970 NOT making it into a portable as such, is if Apple/IMB have developed a portable version of the chip - imagine 970-M type thing. It would have a different name but be essentially the same chip.
Apple has a small market share, and that means they have a relatively small developer base. It's always been in their best interest to have a product line that is easy and convenient to develop software/hardware for.
The new chip needs to be an easy transition for developers who currently have G3/G4 optimised products. Adding a different chip to the portables might confuse that situation even more.