If you put it that way, Apple has copied too.
Wow thank you for stating something I clearly said a few posts back....
Might want to check out this post, #60: https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/1307135/
Last edited:
If you put it that way, Apple has copied too.
With year-over-year unit growth of over 20%, Apple was the only one of the top five U.S. vendors to see an increase in shipments in an overall market that shrank by nearly 6%.
I guess that helps explain why CES 2012 looks an awful lot like MacWorld 2008........
Image
Image
....and MacWorld 2009.
Image
Image
![]()
Apple never stole IP. They licensed Xerox PARC's IP in the 1980s to create the Lisa and Mac, those are facts. Show me even one example of when Apple actually wholesale violated someone's design patent or was sued over it.
Apple never stole IP. They licensed Xerox PARC's IP in the 1980s to create the Lisa and Mac, those are facts. Show me even one example of when Apple actually wholesale violated someone's design patent or was sued over it.
It's funny how this first big move by Apple pretty much established their modus operandi since.
Apple didn't invent the GUI. They licensed it. Good for them. But then they turned around and sued MS for having the audacity to implement a similar idea to one they themselves licensed from someone else. It wasn't their innovation to sue over, only their implementation of. And much like the IP battles we're seeing Apple fight now, they lost their ass in the proceedings.
You just said it. Apple licensed the technology and Microsoft stole it.
It's funny how this first big move by Apple pretty much established their modus operandi since.
Apple didn't invent the GUI. They licensed it. Good for them. But then they turned around and sued MS for having the audacity to implement a similar idea to one they themselves licensed from someone else. It wasn't their innovation to sue over, only their implementation of. And much like the IP battles we're seeing Apple fight now, they lost their ass in the proceedings.
Apple never licensed the GUI.
You just said it. Apple licensed the technology and Microsoft stole it.
You're right the purchased it..I know you want to find fault with the percieved titan but c'mon this line of thought is like calling masturbation sex because you ejaculate..
The first successful commercial GUI product was the Apple Macintosh, which was heavily inspired by PARC's work; Xerox was allowed to buy pre-IPO stock from Apple, in exchange for engineer visits and an understanding that Apple would create a GUI product.[6]
They didn't purchase it either.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PARC_(company)#cite_note-5
Whereas, Microsoft was allowed to peek into the Mac lab and Bill Gates just stole the UI without even asking, much less licensing or pre-IPO stock.
They actually did along with the mouse....
There is nothing there that says they bought the GUI or licensed it.
What would you call being "allowed to buy pre-IPO stock from Apple, in exchange for engineer visits and an understanding that Apple would create a GUI product."? Sounds like a purchase to me.
Sounds like Apple might have bought the engineers to create a GUI for them, not the GUI itself.
"...an understanding that Apple would create a GUI product."
Maybe you're reading something different. (The "engineer visits" referenced are Apple engineers visiting PARC.)
There is nothing there that says they bought the GUI or licensed it.
----------
No they didn't. Xerox didn't invent the mouse. Douglas Engelbart did.
Either way, that doesn't mean apple bought the GUI.
They bought access to the PARC's GUI research and permission to use it in a product. What is the point of the distinction that you are trying to make?
The point that I'm trying to make is that Apple didn't buy the GUI or license it.
How is buying the GUI different than paying for access to the GUI research and permission to use it in a product?
If Apple had bought the GUI, then no one but Apple could use it. Apple only got inspired by Xerox, which is why they wanted access to the GUI research and used it on their Macintosh. Same goes for the mouse.
There you go. So would you be okay if I were to say that Apple bought a license to use PARC's GUI-related IP in future products?