Apple Marches in San Francisco Pride Parade

[hagar]

BTW, I suppose you know that paedophilia was accepted and praised at the 68 sexual revolution, don't you? If you don't know it, take note, because the gender ideology agenda mimics the 60s revolution, and it's quite likely that acceptance of paedophilia will be next.

I have no idea why you keep obsessing over paedophilia, as it has nothing to do with being gay. And I never heard anybody pleading for the acceptance of paedophilia in the LGBTQ community. I’m very sure that will never happen. Maybe you’re confusing with the Catholic Church. Plenty of child molesters there.

 

[0388631]

What an odd wad.

 

[LordVic]

I have no idea why you keep obsessing over paedophilia, as it has nothing to do with being gay. And I never heard anybody pleading for the acceptance of paedophilia in the LGBTQ community. I’m very sure that will never happen. Maybe you’re confusing with the Catholic Church. Plenty of child molesters there.

COnservatives LOVE slippery slope fallacies to defend their position of intolerance.

I remember when gay marriage was legalized up here, the conservatives were screaming things like 'if you allow marriage with men, whats next? marriage to children? Marriage to dogs? marriage to toasters?!"

it's a fallacious argument that cannot be accurately defended against or for because it's fictional tripe. But it makes them feel like they have a valid argument. They don't. it's all part of this modern day nonsense that "we must hear everyone equally". No, Sometimes, not all opinions are valid or worth listening to. Anyone who is trying to make a link to Homosexuality between consenting adults and pedophilia or zoophilia is not making a good faith argument and should not even be warranted a response.

 

[The-Real-Deal82]

COnservatives LOVE slippery slope fallacies to defend their position of intolerance.

I remember when gay marriage was legalized up here, the conservatives were screaming things like 'if you allow marriage with men, whats next? marriage to children? Marriage to dogs? marriage to toasters?!"

it's a fallacious argument that cannot be accurately defended against or for because it's fictional tripe. But it makes them feel like they have a valid argument. They don't. it's all part of this modern day nonsense that "we must hear everyone equally". No, Sometimes, not all opinions are valid or worth listening to. Anyone who is trying to make a link to Homosexuality between consenting adults and pedophilia or zoophilia is not making a good faith argument and should not even be warranted a response.

I remember those arguments being used on here and it got very heated. People comparing the rape of children to consenting adults engaging in a homosexual relationship like it was the same logic. Unbelievable to be honest and scary these types of people exist in the modern civilised world.