After just over two years of stellar service from the old one, I just setup a fresh new 27" Retina 5K P3 model. It's 3.3 GHz / 32GB / 2TB Fusion.
Besides actually doing resource demanding work to justify this model, it is nice to have the performance of this configuration.
I do not think it is cool to say : I have the Large iPad? or the small iPhone? But I agree that they have to come up with better names.They've really lost control of the names... It has become so convoluted with so many iPad and iPhone variants. They should just market the phone as a single iPhone 6S, coming in three sizes S, M , L. Same with the iPad, something simple like that would make it so much easier.
he didn't say you shouldn't, spherox.I'll call it whatever the **** I want, Phil.
"iPads pro" is clearly wrong, but I think I'll stick with "iPhones", "Macs", etc when pluralising.
Sorry Schiller.
Well that doesn't sound pretentious...
....and that is how marketing works. Rightly, Apple marketing should implore using "Apple iPhone devices".He's fighting a losing battle. Give it up. If I'm referring to more than one iPhone, I will call them iPhones. What he's suggesting is just stupid.
I guess we've been saying Steve's name wrong all along.
It's Steve Job.
This is a talk any good IP attorney will give you. For a trademark to continue, it should only be used as an adjective.
To keep a trademark, a company should never use marks of trade in other parts of grammar for public communication. Using a trademarked term as a noun or a verb dilutes the value for the mark.
Trademarked terms such as Xerox and Kleenex have been compromised because this diluted use in ads and press releases.
I don't understand the people saying "Oh, this is stupid" - it's not stupid, it's how Apple likes things referred to. I've seen so-called "long time Apple customers" refer to iPad as:
~ IPAD
~ I-Pad
~ iPAD
~ i-PAD
etc.
If you were taking inventory of a stock of iPad units, you would say "There are 1,289 iPad Pro units in stock" which is effectively the same thing as Schiller is saying; he is clarifying that the product brand name DOES NOT and SHOULD NOT change, because it is a brand name - the singularity is "iPad Pro device" and the plurality is "iPad Pro DeviceS" which ensures the brand name for the product does not become muddied and confused.
It's perfectly good English, and I am an Englishman telling you this FROM England, thank you very much.
Oh, and lest I forget - it's LEGO, not LEGOS, because, in the same respect, to change from this is to alter the brand naming. Do you call more than one grain of rice, "riceS"?
Okay look people, no one here is saying that Phil is incorrect about how the devices are to be referred by his employees and on official forms, we are saying that it was horrible of him to make it public. Obviously this has had an effect on many people because this is not the only forum talking about it.
Uh oh...I think people are upset because we have had TWO WORLD WARS to give us our rights to freedom of speech we all enjoy today, and that includes modern day proper pronunciations, no one is going to say I have several iPad, it's stupid.