Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Yeah, because their naming conventions are so simple. This does not include "iPhones" SE or the "iPads Pro".

lol.jpg
 
What a tool. I'm glad I don't have two iPhone telephones. Saying that is too exhausting.

This level of pretension is why it took me so long to switch to Apple. It is silly beyond imagination.
 
"Can't innovate my ass".

Per this education and if he was speaking for the team, how would he complete the sentence: "Can't innovate our _______" Apparently per this, it can't be the obvious plural of his singular noun. Can't innovate our human waste chutes? Can't innovate our waste expelling units? ;)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: AppleScruff1
Can't wait for people who haven't seen the publishing world to freak out because Apple said to do something a specific way.

Honestly, its like telling someone to use "cancelled" vs "canceled" - the only goal would be to find consistency..
 
Apple has officially jumped the shark or Phil has a mischievous sense of humor. I know which one I am leaning towards...
 
Seems to be a double standard, Phil. Unless there are two Phil Schiller humans out there.

Always been strangely annoyed by the way everyone refers to Apple devices during keynotes. "But now let's talk about iPhone," instead of "the iPhone." Anyway, not a big deal, I reckon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: autrefois
This is a talk any good IP attorney will give you. For a trademark to continue, it should only be used as an adjective.

To keep a trademark, a company should never use marks of trade in other parts of grammar for public communication. Using a trademarked term as a noun or a verb dilutes the value for the mark.

Trademarked terms such as Xerox and Kleenex have been compromised because this diluted use in ads and press releases.

Exactly. Even Apple should not refer to it as "iPhone", they should refer to it as "iPhone® mobile phone" or similar. Same with doing a search online. Google says you don't "Google something", you "perform a Google® search".

Obviously, individual private users are free to call it whatever they want. But as a company, to keep their trademark protected, they need to make sure that the trademarked term is a description of a product, not a name. And be consistent in using it that way.

It's funny, Apple is actually very bad at this. "When you use iPhone," "The latest MacBook Pro excels at", etc.
 
Apple cares about us sad human beings. Coming soon, iDictionary. Fits in your pocket and starts at only $299. Five different color options including rose gold.
 
  • Like
Reactions: apolloa
Why did the author interpret this as a mandate or a correction from Phil?

Phil's tweet didn't say that not pluralizing is incorrect – just that pluralizing the terms themselves isn't necessary to refer to more than one in a sentence.

I didn't interpret it that way, just truncated it to make the title shorter. I've changed the title to include the full text because some commenters thought it was misleading -- wasn't my intention, so I apologize.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Starfia
I bought two Apple Watch watches? Mmmk.

2 Apple Watch devices, at least according to their naming convention. I can confirm, this is a real and important training point for Apple employees. I have been corrected by an employee of Apple, and he explained parts of it. It seems to be equal parts IP law trademark concerns and Apple product branding. It is important to them, no matter how silly it seems to us.
 
Their share price is heading south because they can no longer innovate; their product launches are self-parodies; their core software is becoming increasingly unreliable; they are paid large fortunes and redefining the use of English is all they can find to occupy their time. No wonder Icahan dumped them - lock, stock and rotting Apple barrel.......arrogant, clueless and past it, the lot of them.
 
This is a talk any good IP attorney will give you. For a trademark to continue, it should only be used as an adjective.

To keep a trademark, a company should never use marks of trade in other parts of grammar for public communication. Using a trademarked term as a noun or a verb dilutes the value for the mark.

Trademarked terms such as Xerox and Kleenex have been compromised because this diluted use in ads and press releases.

Exactly. Even Apple should not refer to it as "iPhone", they should refer to it as "iPhone® mobile phone" or similar. Same with doing a search online. Google says you don't "Google something", you "perform a Google® search".

Obviously, individual private users are free to call it whatever they want. But as a company, to keep their trademark protected, they need to make sure that the trademarked term is a description of a product, not a name. And be consistent in using it that way.

It's funny, Apple is actually very bad at this. "When you use iPhone," "The latest MacBook Pro excels at", etc.

An intellectual conversation actually came out of this ... good work gents (or gals)!
 
This might be the flagship story to carry MR through the weekend.

haha true.

I wonder now if the level of sheer self indulgent arrogance of AppleS board is at such a level now that they smell their own wind?

spfart3vo.jpg


I have NEVER known a corporate exec take to twitter to 'tell it's customers not to pluralize it's products names!' NEVER known anyone to do that.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Photography
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.