When was the last time customers raised a concern about a hardware defect in an Apple product that ended up not actually being an issue?It means people shouldn’t be so quick to state it’s an issue as if it’s with the entire lineup. It’s ridiculous.
When was the last time customers raised a concern about a hardware defect in an Apple product that ended up not actually being an issue?It means people shouldn’t be so quick to state it’s an issue as if it’s with the entire lineup. It’s ridiculous.
We kind of do because huge issues cannot be buried.But it might be an issue with the entire lineup. Without data, we can't know one way or another, right?
I've only used Apple products for a few years and what I have will likely last at least a few more.All those "I am fine, its a tiny, vocal minority..." folks responding here should look at the videos diagnosing why this occurs. Ask a good, experienced mechanical engineer if the way Apple deployed the screen flex cable can be expected to sustain a life time of open/close cycles. The important question is how a competent engineering organization could allow this material/design risk to be designed into the product. I do not know what the Macbook Pro Dev will be like, but my hopes is it reflects an emphasis on durability, replaceability, modularity, and non-compromised cooling at the expense of design. Until then I will keep planning on how to migrate to a Librem - more than happy to pay a substantial premium for the device attributes and engineering focus Apple has lost.
Most recently? iPhone XS reception issues. Not saying a few (normal when you ship tens of millions) didn't have problems, but people immediately were calling design flaw. Wrong. Wrong. Wrong.When was the last time customers raised a concern about a hardware defect in an Apple product that ended up not actually being an issue?
When was the last time customers raised a concern about a hardware defect in an Apple product that ended up not actually being an issue?
Fair point, but not what I was referring to.It is not the number of issues which are important, but the probability of each issue happening to a particular machine.
Let's say it is 100 problems that can happen to any MacBook Pro. The probability of each issue is independent of each other and the probability is p=0.0001.
Then the probability for having at least one problem would be p=0.01=1% which is good.
Most recently? iPhone XS reception issues. Not saying a few (normal when you ship tens of millions) didn't have problems, but people immediately were calling design flaw. Wrong. Wrong. Wrong.
MacBook Pro throttling issue. People here said hardware issue, no question. Was fixed in a week with a software update. Wrong. Wrong. Wrong.
Point is, people raise issues all the time. Sometimes, there are isolated problems. I don't think the MacBook keyboard is an issue. Ask about it here? It's a design flaw that people can't get over. Mine is flawless, but I don't eat chips and tacos over my keyboard.
I always enjoy the anti-American crowd. High on your perch, posting on a device designed by Americans on a forum started by Americans, using the internet started by Americans to be used by computers, invented by Americans. But let me know what great contributions Singapore has made to history.
I have decided to do the same thing. Stick with cross platform apps and services.People tense to be less vocal when they can just walk in to an Apple Store for help.
Still, I prefer not having to go in the first place.
Apple is the only brand I had to go and exchange computers. 15MBP 2018 x 2/ 13MBP 2018 x 1 in order to get a workable machine.
This is all within 1 month... It gotten to the point where, I have decided against going full Apple.
Just in case, I need to make sure I can move out of Apple ecosystem at any time.
Basically Apple devices without using most of Apple services. (including imessage, password manager, safari, icloud and anything related to it etc.)
Mine, too. I'd wanted to update it, but after doing a bit of research decided a cheaper PC would suffice for the things I wanted to do and the old laptop is still just fine, though a bit pokey at times. I had bought that laptop and paid the "Apple tax" for it precisely because it was supposed to be as reliable and long lived as it has been.
Go ask questions in the Alternatives to Mac Hardware forumIs there a thread that discusses PC alternatives to the Macbook/Macbook Pro line, is there even a chance you could find a 14/15" screen that is somewhat close to the Retina screen and would not be a significant drop in quality, something under 1k, possibly matte screen as well.
That would have been my philosophy until I no longer had the experience you describe. Over the past several years I have been on the receiving end of Apple design decisions and price points which led me to "courageously move forward" with other laptops and phones. I actually find Linux to be kind of fun to tinker with these days, and on PC laptops of increasingly exceptional quality. After my personal disappointments, I have come to take experiences of others with Apple product problems a lot more seriously. I will not risk paying thousands of dollars on a laptop with unreliable keyboards and displays, cooling/throttling issues with high performance cpu's, and expensive repairs dictated by poor repairability designs. I don't want to pay $700 to fix a $6 cable, or $400 to replace a butterfly keyboard. Sure, not all of the macbooks have these issues, but the failure rate is significant enough to make me wary of purchase. I continue to follow this forum in hopes of finding positive changes by Apple to address the issues of the last several years, and I still have an iPhone 6s+, a 2017 iPad Pro 12, and a 2017 iMac. Apple design issues have pushed me away from the phones and the iPads currently produced, and QC problems and lack of ports have done the same with the Macbook Pro line. Hopefully, you will continue to be pleased with Apple design decisions and QC issues as they pertain to you. Good luck, and yes, Godspeed with your continued Apple bliss.By all means, purchase that Lenovo laptop. Godspeed and courage moving forward. Since all of my Apple laptops/desktops have been super reliable* over the years, I'll continue to purchase Apple computers.
That is often the case with CEO's who were also founders of their companies. Microsoft didn't really begin to lose direction and ground until Bill Gates retired. Apple nearly lost it when they pushed out Jobs. His experiences with developing the NEXT line, based upon BSD Unix, was aptly applied to the Mac design when he returned to Apple, creating an OS based upon BSD. Jobs always had an eye for a balance between form and function in his products - the form was appealingly elegant, and the function was efficient and top notch (it just worked). That balance has been lost in much of Apple products - form has become ascendant, and function has started to take a back seat. I never really thought Jobs was arrogant - he was just focused and passionate about the Apple company, his co-creation.Even when Jobs was flashing his arogant nature, you felt he was passionate about Apple products.
There is no passion in saving 20 cents by using a shorter cable.
I have no idea.Is there a thread that discusses PC alternatives to the Macbook/Macbook Pro line, is there even a chance you could find a 14/15" screen that is somewhat close to the Retina screen and would not be a significant drop in quality, something under 1k, possibly matte screen as well.
And yet you still don't have any data to support large failure rates or that the issue is widespread.Point - keyboard reliability should not be a concern on buying a high priced laptop. Not in 2016, 2017, and 2018. Apple used to make a reliable keyboard, and instead decided to make one that was less reliable.
>I don't think the MacBook keyboard is an issue.
It does. I have personally experienced problems with mine. Apple has a warranty extended to cover the problem. There is a problem with the keyboard. Beyond that its loud and clicky - and distracting in a quiet environment.
Know what else shouldnt be a reliability concern on a modern laptop? Screen backlight failure due to how/how often the laptop is opened.
On a premium laptop, which these are, because spec wise we pay the most for an Apple product, having common failures of keyboard and now failures of weak, short, poorly designed ribbon cables that arent serviceable do not say "premium" - in fact it says the exact opposite.
When was the last time customers raised a concern about a hardware defect in an Apple product that ended up not actually being an issue?
How is my post Anti American ?
Care to explain ?
I mean if you really want an asbestos computer.
In my part of the world , we have banned asbestos due to scientific proof of its affect to human health.
And if an American designed, American made , American invented asbestos computer , you are welcome to be patriotic and buy it to spite other and show your American “freedom”?
Windows works well.let's see... Broken keyboards, flexgate, graphics glitches, T2 chip fiasco.
Anything is working properly in their Macbook "Pro"?
I feel the same way and I was in the process of buying the new Mac Mini but then decided against it. The base model @$799 is crippled with a 128GB SSD drive. I can jump to the i5 with a 6 core CPU and 256GB SSD for $1,100. The worse part is that the SSD is soldered to the motherboard so if either the T2 Controller Chip or the soldered SSD fails (finite amount of writes) that's an expensive motherboard replacement. I have no worries regarding any of that with my 2012 Mac Mini because I can easily upgrade the RAM or replace the SSD.It has happened enough times to make me likely not to risk $2000+ on my getting one of the lemons. If 1% or .1% of the product is demonstrably defective the manufacturer should offer repair or replacement for a reasonable price. I couldn't find sales estimates for MBP's, but total Mac sales for 2018 looks to be roughly 18 million. So doing the math, 1% is about 180000, and .1% around 18000. For relatively cheap products, let's say a cheap PC running around $300 or less, I'm more likely to accept such a failure rate as an acceptable risk for price paid. I'm not inclined to be so forgiving/accepting of that rate of failure for a laptop running 2-5 thousand dollars. This is especially a problem when the failures tend to happen after the warranty has expired, and for reasons beyond the customer's control with normal use. This becomes further problematic if design forces major circuit board or subassembly replacement for failures of individual components (such as keyboards costing $400 to replace a $50 part, and with the "flexgate" issue costing $700 to fix a $6 cable).
I SO hear you. I've become a Linux mainline userI feel the same way and I was in the process of buying the new Mac Mini but then decided against it. The base model @$799 is crippled with a 128GB SSD drive. I can jump to the i5 with a 6 core CPU and 256GB SSD for $1,100. The worse part is that the SSD is soldered to the motherboard so if either the T2 Controller Chip or the soldered SSD fails (finite amount of writes) that's an expensive motherboard replacement. I have no worries regarding any of that with my 2012 Mac Mini because I can easily upgrade the RAM or replace the SSD.
Some say well all you have to do is add an external SSD to the 2018 Mini and my answer is why? Why do I have to spend even more money to because Apple decided to cripple the Mac Mini on purpose for financial reasons? There are tons of micro PC's out now that are just as small or smaller as the Mac Mini that allow you to easily upgrade the RAM or swap out the blade SSD stick if it fails at a much cheaper costs.
Thankfully for me when my 2012 Mini is no longer supported it will be converted to a Linux box. There's so much similarities between macOS and Linux it's not funny and Linux as an open source OS is even more secure than macOS.
Way empathize with your place. I gave up on Apple laptops, now have a System76 Oryx Pro, a Dell XPS13, and an HP "gaming" laptop, all running Linux. The Linux OS has so improved the last 10 years for the desktop as to be a huge competitor for both Apple and Windows for the laptop/desktop market. PC's have very much come to the fore in hardware offerings. And as you mention, Apple hardware design, with soldered SSDs and memory boards, et al, is not amenable to repair or upgrade. And no really usable ports. Onward - I miss the old Apple, but don't care for the new one.I feel the same way and I was in the process of buying the new Mac Mini but then decided against it. The base model @$799 is crippled with a 128GB SSD drive. I can jump to the i5 with a 6 core CPU and 256GB SSD for $1,100. The worse part is that the SSD is soldered to the motherboard so if either the T2 Controller Chip or the soldered SSD fails (finite amount of writes) that's an expensive motherboard replacement. I have no worries regarding any of that with my 2012 Mac Mini because I can easily upgrade the RAM or replace the SSD.
Some say well all you have to do is add an external SSD to the 2018 Mini and my answer is why? Why do I have to spend even more money to because Apple decided to cripple the Mac Mini on purpose for financial reasons? There are tons of micro PC's out now that are just as small or smaller as the Mac Mini that allow you to easily upgrade the RAM or swap out the blade SSD stick if it fails at a much cheaper costs.
Thankfully for me when my 2012 Mini is no longer supported it will be converted to a Linux box. There's so much similarities between macOS and Linux it's not funny and Linux as an open source OS is even more secure than macOS.
One of my favorite things to do when I read this forum is remember all the millions of happy customers with working-ass 2016 and 2017 MacBook Pros. Perspective.