And yet under his leadership, we had a MacBook, 2 sizes of MBA, and 3 sizes of MBP 🤔What was the first thing Steve Jobs did when he returned back to Apple? He SIMPLIFIED the product line.
And yet under his leadership, we had a MacBook, 2 sizes of MBA, and 3 sizes of MBP 🤔What was the first thing Steve Jobs did when he returned back to Apple? He SIMPLIFIED the product line.
A 12" Macbook needs to be priced higher than a 13" MBA because making a significantly smaller laptop actually costs more money. You need to be more precise, use smaller components, and optimize space better which will lead to a more expensive laptop.Fun thoughts
I’m going to put my chair CEO hat for a second. Apple wouldn’t do this, but it’s fun to play 🤭
One scenario, following the iPad model. The iPad has a lineup of iPad for entry level, iPad Air for mainstream, and iPad Pro for premium. Assuming that, first I would get rid of the 13” MBP. Best done when M3 is out, assuming the 3nm node means the M3 can perform as well as a lightly cooled M2. This creates room to increase the MacBook Air price point. Apple can do this by adding the 15” MBA and upping the base config as 8/512. Then Apple can simply reuse the old 12” MacBook design for the entry level model.
So $999 12” M2 Macbook 8/256
$1299 13” M3 MacBook Air 8/512
$1499 15” M3 MacBook Air 8/512
$1999 14” M3 Pro MacBook Pro 16/512
And so on. Quite nice lineup, closely aligned to the ipad lineup.
Marketing will show that now you can have M2 for less ($999), and more value for MacBook Air (8/512 for $100 less than today)
That is the issue and is why I am leaning toward betting Apple probably will NOT putting out a 12” MacBook as this is just a rumor for click-bait.The caveat to this is to get it that small required some expensive/finicky custom tech. That meant it needed to be priced around the level of a 13" MacBook Pro at the time. Whether Apple Silicon would allow them to do without the terraced battery and bottom case, the butterfly keyboard, and the much denser logic board is probably the key to whether this could be an economically viable product now. Before people come in with the "I'd pay a premium for the smaller size" argument, you may, but will people be willing to pay hundreds more over a similar 13" MBA en masse? Positioning this to appeal beyond a niche would be tricky if they can't get the margins they want on a $999 starting price at most.
The possible solution may be using the new design language, allowing more space inside, but will that take away some of the diminutive feel that is what fans of this form factor love about it?
I don't get what people find confusing about Apple's Notebook lineup.
I remember the iBook times when Apple had "consumer" iBooks in 12" and 14" and "professional" PowerBooks in 12", 15" and 17".
Now we have the "consumer" MacBook Air 13" and maybe soon a MacBook Air 15" and the "professional" MacBook Pro 14" and 16".
I’d be happy if they just release the 12 inch in the old chassis with a newest chip and call it MacBook SE and keep the price low. the original 12 inch had a small board but I don’t think they’ll have problem putting the whole apple silicon architecture on itA 12" Macbook needs to be priced higher than a 13" MBA because making a significantly smaller laptop actually costs more money. You need to be more precise, use smaller components, and optimize space better which will lead to a more expensive laptop.
So people need to stop thinking that a 12" MB should cost less than a 13" MBA. It didn't cost less before, it's not going to cost less in the future.
My thoughts is that they will repurpose the previous MBA form factor into the MacBook SE and give it periodic updates while retaining the ~ $999 price tag. I really don't see them creating a whole new form/design for an entry point MacBook. They will repurpose older designs like they did for the Apple Watch SEs, the iPhone SEs, the Mac mini and even the base iPads for years for their entry points.Fun thoughts
I’m going to put my chair CEO hat for a second. Apple wouldn’t do this, but it’s fun to play 🤭
One scenario, following the iPad model. The iPad has a lineup of iPad for entry level, iPad Air for mainstream, and iPad Pro for premium. Assuming that, first I would get rid of the 13” MBP. Best done when M3 is out, assuming the 3nm node means the M3 can perform as well as a lightly cooled M2. This creates room to increase the MacBook Air price point. Apple can do this by adding the 15” MBA and upping the base config as 8/512. Then Apple can simply reuse the old 12” MacBook design for the entry level model.
So $999 12” M2 Macbook 8/256
$1299 13” M3 MacBook Air 8/512
$1499 15” M3 MacBook Air 8/512
$1999 14” M3 Pro MacBook Pro 16/512
And so on. Quite nice lineup, closely aligned to the ipad lineup.
Marketing will show that now you can have M2 for less ($999), and more value for MacBook Air (8/512 for $100 less than today)
That’s a possibility as well. That’s exactly the second scenario I had in my head 😁 MacBook SE, MacBook, the. MacBook Pro.My thoughts is that they will repurpose the previous MBA form factor into the MacBook SE and give it periodic updates while retaining the ~ $999 price tag. I really don't see them creating a whole new form/design for an entry point MacBook. They will repurpose older designs like they did for the Apple Watch SEs, the iPhone SEs, the Mac mini and even the base iPads for years for their entry points.
Personally it seems to me that at certain latitudes you have some psychological limit to associate ‘small sizes’ with ‘great prices’. It could be an age problem, that is, young people who have never seen miniaturized technology cost more than the big one, but it is not so, because many are elderly, maybe not of technology, and weigh a kilo of technology like a kilo of potatoes: 2 kilos is “better” than a kilo.Fun thoughts
I’m going to put my chair CEO hat for a second. Apple wouldn’t do this, but it’s fun to play 🤭
One scenario, following the iPad model. The iPad has a lineup of iPad for entry level, iPad Air for mainstream, and iPad Pro for premium. Assuming that, first I would get rid of the 13” MBP. Best done when M3 is out, assuming the 3nm node means the M3 can perform as well as a lightly cooled M2. This creates room to increase the MacBook Air price point. Apple can do this by adding the 15” MBA and upping the base config as 8/512. Then Apple can simply reuse the old 12” MacBook design for the entry level model.
So $999 12” M2 Macbook 8/256
$1299 13” M3 MacBook Air 8/512
$1499 15” M3 MacBook Air 8/512
$1999 14” M3 Pro MacBook Pro 16/512
And so on. Quite nice lineup, closely aligned to the ipad lineup.
Marketing will show that now you can have M2 for less ($999), and more value for MacBook Air (8/512 for $100 less than today)
My mom uses a MacBook 12 and I just got an Air 13. Not sure how they would differentiate the two devices other than display size. I suppose they could eliminate the "feet" on the Air 13 design to make it even thinner.![]()
I think people are really under estimating the size difference between the MacBook 12 and the Air 13. This is the best picture I could find that shows off the difference.
True, but it's an absolute non issue for me because both my iPad and MacBook tether to my iPhone.... one contract, one monthly fee and one piece of hardware to depreciate... I will NEVER pay Apple TWICE for a redundant modem or SoftBank TWICE for two separate contracts when I have one in my main daily device: my iPhone.And, having the option to have internet access wherever you are with no external hardware required.
But it was distinct products lines with screen options to match. Why would I buy a 12" MacBook vs a 13" Air? Or a 13" MacBook Pro over a 15" Air? It gets even more confusing when you mix in all the different variations of Mx chips. In the iBook/PowerBook days and even the first Intel decade, you had defined classes that didn't overlap as much. Consumer notebook, Ultra portable, Pro notebook.And yet under his leadership, we had a MacBook, 2 sizes of MBA, and 3 sizes of MBP 🤔
No. this is no longer the case. The iPad AIR is already ENTIRELY capable of running Mac OS at a lower price point than the MacBook Air... Tim just chose not to let it so as not to cannibalise MacBook sales.A 12" Macbook needs to be priced higher than a 13" MBA because making a significantly smaller laptop actually costs more money. You need to be more precise, use smaller components, and optimize space better which will lead to a more expensive laptop.
So people need to stop thinking that a 12" MB should cost less than a 13" MBA. It didn't cost less before, it's not going to cost less in the future.
Distinct product linesWhy would I buy a 12" MacBook vs a 13" Air?
You're assuming the M2 MBP stays in the line-up. Unlikely.Or a 13" MacBook Pro over a 15" Air?
The MacBook lineup came with multiple Intel chips even within distinct product lines before the Mx chips.It gets even more confusing when you mix in all the different variations of Mx chips.
You're right, I went at it as if the thinnest part of the rMB was its overall thickness, but the tappered "trick" used also means Apple reduces the thickness where it can because there's nothing requiring more space - while the current MBA (which looks a lot like the current MBPs) appears boxier due to the even thickness.The current MBA is 0.44 in (1.1 cm). That makes it thinner than any previous Air. Even a little thinner than the 12” MacBook. Of course those models had the wedge shape that showed a very thin front edge to trick you into seeing it as thinner. It’s a trick played on your eyes. The M2 Air is more honest about its form and is ultimately thinner. I suppose Apple could make them a little thinner if people wanted less battery life but that would not be a popular tradeoff.
- 2017 MBA 0.11 in (0.3 cm) to 0.68 in (1.7 cm)
- 2008/2009 MBA 0.16 in (0.4 cm) to 0.76 in (1.9 cm)
- 12” MacBook 0.14 in (0.36 cm) to 0.52 in (1.3 cm)
Because it weighs nearly a pound less.Why would I buy a 12" MacBook vs a 13" Air?
Right. And it seems that there are a lot of people who don't quite get that. If one travels a lot every once matters.Because it weighs nearly a pound less.
Tbh, I think that you're probably right.That’s assuming Apple would discontinue the M1 MacBook Air. But the current Apple will not spend money for new designs and production for their low end models. Take M1 MacBook Air, 13” MacBook Pro, iPhone SE, iPad 9, all Apple’s lowest tier reuse old designs.
The 12” MacBook makes no sense in the current lineup. This rumor is just a random old rumor being resurfaced to create news.