The name is scheme makes no sense anymore
Irony.
The name is scheme makes no sense anymore
The problem is Apple has repeatedly misgauged the market for small devices and tech reviewers and pundits did them no favors. Compact devices have almost always been coveted by pros and executives where smallness is the premium feature not the cost saving compromise. All customers like me wanted was more power and storage. The webcam and single port were not really an issue and the butterfly keyboard, while not ideal, was an acceptable compromise if it only had been more reliable long-term. No tablet, and certainly not an iPad in any of their current incarnations is going to replace the MacBook for those that need it. Trying to make this a "cheap" computer is very misguided as I and many like me would have happily paid twice the price for just little more umph.It would be good to get a better sense of WHO wants this, to be sure. My post assumed that person was someone who wanted a lightweight, cheap laptop, and didn't care a whole lot about power. I think Apple assumes EVERYONE needs a super-powerful computer. Students using it for writing a paper using Microsoft Word don't need power. They need portability and lower prices. Even a $999 would be a good entry point price.
That’s cool and all, but their product offering has been confusing and all over the place the last few years.
The ghost of Steve Jobs is about to come back and draw this on their meeting whiteboard lol.
View attachment 2159100
I don’t think so. Folks choosing the iPad are choosing it because they like the set of features it has, one of which is the potential to have always on cellular internet, which the Mac likely won’t get. And, iPadOS and its vast array of apps.This will cannibalize the iPad even more.
No one is going to buy it for $1300 in 2024. It sold so poorly in 2015 that Apple discontinued after 2 years. 2 years!!
A $599 iPad Air M1 can easily replace it as a media device that can occasionally edit an Excel and write an email. In fact, an iPad can do a lot more than a 12" Macbook can.
I know what you mean, and I totally agree. What I feel is silly is for Apple to have tons of devices of all sizes, when I think it should focus on fewer but greater devices.I have an iPad Pro but have yet to be as productive on it as I am with my 12” MacBook running macOS. If the iPad ran macOS, had a more advanced file management system and allowed for desktop versions of apps to be loaded I would switch in a minute.
That was then. Now with M2, it can be a do-it-all workhorse.I loved the 12" MacBook! Great device for simple tasks and travel.
And, having the option to have internet access wherever you are with no external hardware required.There is pretty much no use case for an iPad air with a keyboard that can’t be covered by the base MacBook Air except digital illustrator/artist and arguably they likely don’t need the keyboard.
I agree. It will be a whole different ball game now with Apple silicon.That was then. Now with M2, it can be a do-it-all workhorse.
Why would anybody need that?
You really need that ONE inch less than the 13-inch MacBook Air?
That ONE inch makes the difference between too big and just right for some people?
I‘ll never understand that, I almost find steps of two inches between models too small. 🤷♂️
It would mirror the iPad lineup, not confusing at all.I think the "MacBook" name should always have a qualifier tagged on. Otherwise, it suffers from a perception that it's underpowered. I'm glad that Apple has held onto the "Air" name for that reason. Just having a machine called "MacBook" is confusing to consumers alongside the Air and Pro variants. Apple has hurt itself by ditching the wedge design of the Air, so if they do introduce just "MacBook", what makes the Air an Air? Confusing all around.
I'm probably the only one who bought 3 of them. I remember that many have bought them, because there are several used ones but they are not found for less than 400€ in my area.Unless they price it very affordably, it's gonna be pointless device in already confusing Mac product line.
Or maybe they learned from previous Macbook which pretty much no one bought and this new MacBook will be nothing like the previous one.