Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
1. don't want to remember to bring the one cable the phone came with if I want to charge it.
2. can't drop $30 every time I want to charge my phone somewhere other than my house.

Take your cable with you. Simple.

----------

No it doesn't. They're going to want a royalty off every accessory. The security is in there not so that it doesn't get hacked but so they can show intent on patent suits.



They'll lose some customers to this for sure - but they want to control the US and European retail channels and prevent them from selling the knockoffs.

The connectors offered through third parties will be cheaper. I was referring to 3rd parties. Apple's prices will probably stay consistent for the next 12 months.
 
here's an idea...release your tight grip on the lightning thing so we don't end up with bricked iPhones by using cheap Chinese hacked crap.

I'm wondering if it could be one of the reasons Apple wants to implement this restriction. Might be a quality control issue. Cheap Chinese cables might cause poor data reception or even possibly frying your Apple device. Since they use adaptive technology, one of these cables could send power to a data line instead of a power rail frying the device.

I do think now that they also want to licence out this lightning adapter to make additional revenue. But nothing different then what most licences do already with software or hardware.
 
Unless they plan to stop companies in China from making cheap knockoffs I'm not sure what the point of the tight control is.

At the current rate we will see knockoff cables before any legitimate 'approved' accessories.

Apple has patented the hell out of it They will get import bans against all these pirates, and sue them into oblivion if any of them try to Samsung a Lightning connector.

Mitt will come down HARD on China if they refuse to play ball.
 
Tighter controls are good. My co-worker went through 2 perfectly good iPhones before he realized it was the cheap $5 cable he bought from Amazon that was causing the issue.
 
On top of what many have said here... The whole "security" thing with these chips is horribly misleading. The only thing "secure" about it, from what I know, is to help prevent data corruption. If anything at all, it should be labeled differently than a "security feature".
 
Over-complicating what should be the simplest part of a device is a move guaranteed to piss off the public and slow adoption.

A cable should be a dumb, cheap thing you can easily find and break and buy without even thinking about it.

It shouldn't require reverse engineering, authorized parts and costly production.

That's your opinion—my opinion, on the other hand, is that this is a great innovation that will provide flexibility for the future of my iPhone 5. The ability to reassign pins to fulfill different needs is a great convenience that will ensure that any device that is released under Apple's standards will work well. This means that new technologies that the 30pin wouldn't be able to support, and that Apple doesn't currently anticipate, will still be able to take advantage of the lightning port on iOS devices because of the pin assignment features. I, for one, think that is a brilliant move on Apple's part.
 
Apple has patented the hell out of it They will get import bans against all these pirates, and sue them into oblivion if any of them try to Samsung a Lightning connector.

Mitt will come down HARD on China if they refuse to play ball.

:D Thank you for this, I lol'd

----------

Well looks like you're stuck without a cable, out $30 dollars, or you're going to brick your phone. Good luck.

Cables are only $19 btw, not $30.
 
Where did you read this? :eek:

You don't need to read anything.

USB 2.0 on a 2010 MBP can read and write just over 34 MB / second (per USB port, measured with two external hard drives). Therefore anything that is slower than 34 MB / second is not limited by USB 2.0, but by something else.
 
As it stands now I can walk into a supermarket and buy a 30 pin car adaptor for my iPhone for less than $10. Tell me again why it's a good idea for apple to have a "tight grip" on the accessory market.

Because if they do, they can make sure that their devices yield the best possible User Experience. Supermarket cables? Do you buy food at Wall-Mart too?
 
Tighter control translation: We want to make money off of every accessory that connects to the iPhone.

No. It means that Apple is protecting those companies who want to go about producing a compatible device the "right" way under the "Made For iDevice" program.

You have to give a company an incentive (IE protection from 3rd party knockoffs) to go about doing something the right way. The way Apple has been rolling out Lightning does just that.
 
Would have made more sense if the meeting was held Sept. 13th...



From what I've read, USB 3 would not have affected any performance in the iPhone. The bottleneck in the iPhone is the memory chip, which is slower than USB 2. So you wouldn't see any benefit from 3.0.

Once Apple gets faster chips, they update Lightning to USB 3.0 (probably in a couple years).

Yes... but if it was USB 3.0 and future iterations of the iPhone/iDevices has faster storage then the Lightning cable I bought today/go free with my iPhone today will be useful for my next 3 or 4 generations of iDevices.

Also the irony of calling a "same as the last decade" speed cable; "Lightning", makes me :(
 
suggested news title revision


Apple Meeting With Accessory Makers to Promote Lightning Royalty fees

;)


like for Thunderbolt, we won't see any cheap accessories coming...



Why should Apple allow anybody to make cheap accessories that will ruin the User Experience for their customers?

Apple is doing exactly the right thing. They invented a revolutionary new port connector, and they deserve to be compensated.
 
see my first post here.

Ok, it's $19 dollars. Apple is not ripping you off. Seriously, stop whining. Here are the factory prices from China; I sell iPhone 5 cables. These are their prices for me.

100pcs: $7.20 ea
1000pcs: $5.60 ea
2000pcs: $5.12 ea
5000pcs: $4.80 ea
 
No. It means that Apple is protecting those companies who want to go about producing a compatible device the "right" way under the "Made For iDevice" program.

You have to give a company an incentive (IE protection from 3rd party knockoffs) to go about doing something the right way. The way Apple has been rolling out Lightning does just that.

I remember one time someone put a link to a inexpensive Chinese made cable. Unfortunately it was going from a analog to a digital interface without a D/A converter. It would of not worked. Wish I could of remember the exact cable though.
 
Well looks like you're stuck without a cable, out $30 dollars, or you're going to brick your phone. Good luck.

Where do you get this idea your going to brick your phone??! About as stupid as bricking your mac cause you used a non apple usb cable?!!!! News flash , all those of hundreds and hundreds of docks out there..... Do not use apple cables.... It's just connecting a phone, not flashing a device !

----------

Why should Apple allow anybody to make cheap accessories that will ruin the User Experience for their customers?

Apple is doing exactly the right thing. They invented a revolutionary new port connector, and they deserve to be compensated.

How is ones user experience ruined by connecting a phone to a connector?!?! Geez
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.