MTV in the 80s and 90s? No wonder I have zero interest in Apple music and never have any idea who these supposed talented "artists" are. I never cared about or paid attention to MTV in the 80s or the 90s (or the 00s or the 10s) because I don't need a TV or radio station to tell me what music to listen to, I already know and own the music I like and have no need to "discover" aggravating obnoxious noise that is called "music" for some reason.
Nobody cares about lossless, total marketing gimmick.
But you're free to sign up for Tidal or other services.
Which is probably the case everyone would encounter. Being one way or the other.Only if you have the wrong service...
I hate to see music going the way of exclusives, because no one service will get them all. No one wants to join Apple Music, Spotify, Tidal, Google Play, and Amazon Prime just to listen to all their favorite artists. I'll stick with buying CDs before I subscribe to 5 music services.
Garump!MTV in the 80s and 90s? No wonder I have zero interest in Apple music and never have any idea who these supposed talented "artists" are. I never cared about or paid attention to MTV in the 80s or the 90s (or the 00s or the 10s) because I don't need a TV or radio station to tell me what music to listen to, I already know and own the music I like and have no need to "discover" aggravating obnoxious noise that is called "music" for some reason.
MTV in the 80s and 90s? No wonder I have zero interest in Apple music and never have any idea who these supposed talented "artists" are. I never cared about or paid attention to MTV in the 80s or the 90s (or the 00s or the 10s) because I don't need a TV or radio station to tell me what music to listen to, I already know and own the music I like and have no need to "discover" aggravating obnoxious noise that is called "music" for some reason.
I would love the actual radio stations to come back. Sure, there's a separate app for that, but why not have it in the radio part of the primary music app (also looking at you, iTunes)Why can't the iTunes store just be like it was back in the early days. I see some newly released stuff and such on the landing page, I search for my music and buy it. If I want radio there are HUNDEREDS of internet radio stations under "Radio" (much better than listening to Beats1 or this curated crap they have now). That's all we needed. I have zero interest in paying a monthly fee for music I don't own. Ping seemed more put together than this new Music app!
They already have the iTunes festival, so this should easily be within reach.If we can get some "MTV Unplugged" level content, that would be amazing.
There are those that say all music is crap after the Audio CD was introduced.I hope you mean that you don't appreciate the top-40 of recent years, because surely you can't be arguing that no good music has been made since 1979.
There are those that say all music is crap after the Audio CD was introduced.
I still remember seeing demo's of the earliest CD players in the formative 80s with record producers complaining the sound was "too clean" and "too perfect" or -- and I love this one -- "Each play was identical. Vinyl records wearing as it plays gives it individual personality of the media owner."
Believe it or not, there were complaints like this at the start. I'm sure these critics also never found their part of the trickle down cash flow that boomed the American economy in the 80's.
Yup. For most bands, touring and their stage fee is their biggest income from their music.Some bands play music live.
Exclusives has always been around, this is nothing new. Good on Apple for collaborating with artists to create content.
I'm not going to lie Tidal has superior sound quality compared to Apple Music and it's not even close.Nobody cares about lossless, total marketing gimmick.
But you're free to sign up for Tidal or other services.
This!!! They've worked so hard to keep people from pirating now they are forcing people to pirate music again...and people care eve less about music now than they did before.Yes, but "exclusives" in the past didn't typically really exclude a segment of the music buying public from obtaining the content. If a deluxe version of your favorite artist's album was exclusively available at, say for example, Target you would just go to your nearest Target store even if it meant going out of your way to get it. It wasn't really a huge sacrifice. But making content exclusive to a particular music streaming service is screwing over the consumer. It's a well known fact that people only commit to one platform at a time and no one, not even die-hard music fans will fork over an extra ten or twenty bucks per month to use other streaming services just to have access to their favorite artists' music. It's not realistic in the least bit. Perhaps the artists and labels who insist on platform exclusives do this in the hopes of deliberately frustrating music fans and inciting them to go buy music instead of paying a pittance for having smorgasbord of music readily available to them, but what they don't realize is that people can retaliate by simply resorting to piracy again. The music industry has a knack for shooting itself in the foot. They never learn from their mistakes.
Music is crap after 2006.There are those that say all music is crap after the Audio CD was introduced.
I'm not going to lie Tidal has superior sound quality compared to Apple Music and it's not even close.
Which is probably the case everyone would encounter. Being one way or the other.
And this is why I have been waiting for a refreshed Macbook Pro for over a year?
Apple, can you please get your priorities straight?
Yes, but "exclusives" in the past didn't typically really exclude a segment of the music buying public from obtaining the content. If a deluxe version of your favorite artist's album was exclusively available at, say for example, Target you would just go to your nearest Target store even if it meant going out of your way to get it. It wasn't really a huge sacrifice. But making content exclusive to a particular music streaming service is screwing over the consumer. It's a well known fact that people only commit to one platform at a time and no one, not even die-hard music fans will fork over an extra ten or twenty bucks per month to use other streaming services just to have access to their favorite artists' music. It's not realistic in the least bit. Perhaps the artists and labels who insist on platform exclusives do this in the hopes of deliberately frustrating music fans and inciting them to go buy music instead of paying a pittance for having smorgasbord of music readily available to them, but what they don't realize is that people can retaliate by simply resorting to piracy again. The music industry has a knack for shooting itself in the foot. They never learn from their mistakes.