The main advantage to Apple Music is that I can browse music/podcasts/radio etc. using the controls on my steering wheel. Other than that, I wouldn't be using it.
So you have HomePods but not AppleMusic? Man, you’re really missing out.
That $3B acquisition of Beats is now looking like a bargain huh?
$600M per year in recurring revenue in the music streaming business and Beats’ hardware division is worth $1B on its own.
That $3B acquisition of Beats is now looking like a bargain huh?
$600M per year in recurring revenue in the music streaming business and Beats’ hardware division is worth $1B on its own.
Because you can't listen to a specific song or album with radio. Why would I sit there and listen to randomly generated songs when I can listen to exactly what I want to listen to? Radio is fine for background noise, but paying 10 bucks a month to listen to exactly what I want to hear when I want to hear it is well worth the minimal cost.
I've setup running and mood playlists. Running to a radio station would be pretty terrible, especially with ads, DJs and varying tempo songs.
That $3B acquisition of Beats is now looking like a bargain huh?
$600M per year in recurring revenue in the music streaming business and Beats’ hardware division is worth $1B on its own.
Sure, but Apple Music almost definitely has lower gross margins than Apple broadly. Their costs are somewhat fixed as a percentage of revenue, by the rights holders of the music, just like Spotify or any other streaming service.That $3B acquisition of Beats is now looking like a bargain huh?
$600M per year in recurring revenue in the music streaming business and Beats’ hardware division is worth $1B on its own.
That free subscription is being paid by someone, probably Verizon, in exchange for a higher bill.Wonder if those subs include people who are , like me, "free" subs included with Verizon Beyond Unlimited or Above Unlimited service.
Apple didn’t need Beats to stand up a streaming music service. Heck most of the Beats staff are gone. Legacy iTunes staff are running things.
That $3B acquisition of Beats is now looking like a bargain huh?
$600M per year in recurring revenue in the music streaming business and Beats’ hardware division is worth $1B on its own.
Beats gave them an in. Jimmy Iovine and the others had decades worth of deep industry connections that were worth significantly more than the streaming platform itself. It's how they got all their exclusives, knew exactly the right demographics to target and what music was up-and-coming, and how Beats 1 got all of their hosts. By the time all the big Beats people left, the Apple crew had learned enough to run things on their own.Apple didn’t need Beats to stand up a streaming music service. Heck most of the Beats staff are gone. Legacy iTunes staff are running things.
Because you can't listen to a specific song or album with radio. Why would I sit there and listen to randomly generated songs when I can listen to exactly what I want to listen to? Radio is fine for background noise, but paying 10 bucks a month to listen to exactly what I want to hear when I want to hear it is well worth the minimal cost.
I am hoping the new Music app will allow for that. Sound quality of iTunes has always been poor compared to say VLC.Now bring on the hi-res subscription
I don’t have the beta yet, but according to Apple’s own website:A little off topic do any beta users of the new Mac OS know if they removed smart playlist from the new music app? That would make me sad.
That would be $600M per month, wouldn't it?
Apple Music has 60 million paid subscribers
He also said that Beats 1, Apple's radio station, has "tens of millions of listeners."
Sounds like at least 20 million based on wording otherwise it would be "millions" for under 10 million? Does that really mean than at least 1/3 or all Apple Music listen to Beats 1? Seems like a high number.
That $3B acquisition of Beats is now looking like a bargain huh?
$600M per year in recurring revenue in the music streaming business and Beats’ hardware division is worth $1B on its own.
“Revenue” isn’t profit. I don’t know what their net is but $600 Million recurring annual revenue is a hell of a return on their initial investment.