Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Anybody else finding that many tracks in Apple's "Made for Spatial Audio/Dolb Atmos" playlist are not Dolby Atmos versions? They lack the DA indicator in the what's playing window - see attached screen grabs taken on my laptop. Eilish is DA, Kanye is not - both are on that playlist. It's not just that some lack the logo... play a DA track from the playlist and while it's playing toggle the DA on and off in preferences/playback. Example the Eilish track (when you turn DA from on to off or vice versa then click ok in the preference pane) it drops out for a second then comes back completely different. The Kanye track when tested similarly doesn't drop out or change at all. Unless my computer is the only one experiencing this many of the tracks that people notice no difference between the DA version it is because there is no difference - dolby is not applied.
dolby.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chrisandy
If you have both Atmos and Lossless turned on, does the phone default to Lossless over Atmos? I'm guessing both don't work at the same time.

Brian

It seems to depend on the device. On my Apple TV 4K, I have audio quality set to Lossless, but it plays Atmos for songs that support it, but on my iPhone 12 Pro Max, I also have audio quality set to Lossless, but even on tracks that are available in Atmos, I only see the Lossless logo on the now playing screen when playing to my AirPods Pro.

edit: Oh crap, it seems like this behavior is undefined / buggy. On my iPhone, I just changed Wi-Fi streaming audio quality to High Quality so I would be able to listen to Dolby Atmos, and then when I finished listening, I changed it back to Lossless and listened again, but now it defaults to Atmos, even after a restart of the Music app and iPhone, so now I am having to set Dolby Atmos to Off to hear Lossless on tracks that support Atmos, which is the opposite of how it was working before. I guess Apple still needs to work out some bugs.
 
Last edited:
I’ve barely found much with Dolby atmos on. The stuff there is does sound phenomenal though.

typical apple making it confusing though. Couldn’t work out for the life of me why when I downloaded a song to my library it removed the Dolby atmos logo. Turns out you have to turn it on in the settings. Most people won’t know this.
 
Anybody else finding that many tracks in Apple's "Made for Spatial Audio/Dolb Atmos" playlist are not Dolby Atmos versions? They lack the DA indicator in the what's playing window - see attached screen grabs taken on my laptop. Eilish is DA, Kanye is not - both are on that playlist. It's not just that some lack the logo... play a DA track from the playlist and while it's playing toggle the DA on and off in preferences/playback. Example the Eilish track (when you turn DA from on to off or vice versa then click ok in the preference pane) it drops out for a second then comes back completely different. The Kanye track when tested similarly doesn't drop out or change at all. Unless my computer is the only one experiencing this many of the tracks that people notice no difference between the DA version it is because there is no difference - dolby is not applied. View attachment 1790169
Figured out a work around - though many of the tracks in the cloud weren't Atmos when I played them from the cloud once I downloaded suddenly they were Atmos.
 
iPod touch 7 has all the options for lossless and Dolby Atmos, and when enabled no actually plays in either. Apple support says both require iPhones running iOS 14.6, wouldn’t the iPod touch be covered?
 
I don't care about BT not supporting lossless, my AirPods Pro haven't sounded so good ever. Maybe the better bit-rate makes a difference. A wider sound stage, better bass response, more separation (jazz genre). I've actually disabled lossless in settings to prove I hear some difference..... and yes I do. Thanks Apple Music!
 
iPod touch does support Atmos and Lossless (even though apple support just told me it didn’t) it just doesn’t support either through the speaker. Headphones are required to be plugged in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DotCom2
Similar questions for iPhone/Mac output. For example, I'd like to get Hi-Def lossless to a BlueSound Node. Any good way to do that? I *think* AirPlay 2 supports lossless transmission, but I'm almost sure it doesn't currently support Hi-Def lossless transmission.

I'm in the same boat. The Bluesound crew keeps bringing up AirPlay 2 every time they discuss Apple Music Lossless, but AirPlay 2 is up to 24 bit / 48kHz, so no Hi-Res. There are multiple discussions of the issue in the Bluesound support community with no clear solutions:

https://support1.bluesound.com/hc/en-us/community/posts/1500001313502-Apple-Music-Lossless-Hi-Res

I'm considering connecting an AppleTV to our Samsung QLED TV via HDMI, and then the Samsung TV to Node 2i with an optical cable. But I have no idea if digital signal would passed through to Node 2i without conversions in between.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bluespark
I don't care about BT not supporting lossless, my AirPods Pro haven't sounded so good ever. Maybe the better bit-rate makes a difference. A wider sound stage, better bass response, more separation (jazz genre). I've actually disabled lossless in settings to prove I hear some difference..... and yes I do. Thanks Apple Music!
I really don't see how going from 256 AAC to lossless would make the soundstage wider with any gear. I'm also very skeptical about the bass response claim. The main difference between lossy and lossless is actually supposed to be in the highs.

The only way to test it properly is to run a blind test repeatedly: someone else has to switch lossless on and off without telling you what you are hearing, repeat many times and calculate the success rate in identifying lossless correctly.

I've run such a test on my son (an 18-years old jazz musician) using Sennheiser HD800 with iFi micro iDSD Black Label DAC/Amp. He correctly identified lossless in 8 out of 10 trials. His description of lossless vs lossy was more clarity and musicality, as if a thin layer of dust was lifted.
 
Is anyone having issues getting Atmos to work with AirPod Pro on Mac? If I play off laptop speakers, it enables Atmos. If I play to AirPod Pros, it turns on lossless but not Atmos. If I turn off lossless, no Atmos comes through. Halp.
 
Anybody else finding that many tracks in Apple's "Made for Spatial Audio/Dolb Atmos" playlist are not Dolby Atmos versions? They lack the DA indicator in the what's playing window - see attached screen grabs taken on my laptop. Eilish is DA, Kanye is not - both are on that playlist. It's not just that some lack the logo... play a DA track from the playlist and while it's playing toggle the DA on and off in preferences/playback. Example the Eilish track (when you turn DA from on to off or vice versa then click ok in the preference pane) it drops out for a second then comes back completely different. The Kanye track when tested similarly doesn't drop out or change at all. Unless my computer is the only one experiencing this many of the tracks that people notice no difference between the DA version it is because there is no difference - dolby is not applied. View attachment 1790169
Yes. Very frustrating. The entire playlist is dedicated to Made for Spatial Audio yet.. it doesn't play in Spatial Audio... seems like they still need to work out some bugs.
 
The rollout has been terrible for me on M1 Air in California

-songs that streamed in high res lossless would then download at 256kps and then other songs from the same album would download at high res. Then I would go to play the high res downloaded song, and no sound would come out and all of the lossless icons would disappear. 2 days of the lossless icons appearing and disappearing and then songs not playing.

I have 384khz external dac with usb 2 audio support and nice Harbeth speakers. If audio midi automatically changed sampling rates, I wouldn't even bother with high resolution since lossless is fine (obviously 256aac is fine and indistinguishable too - but i have no problem just using lossless if it's there either)

Since there are going to be sample rate conversions on the mac i would just assume use the high res for now once they get their stuff together there.
 
I don't care about BT not supporting lossless, my AirPods Pro haven't sounded so good ever. Maybe the better bit-rate makes a difference. A wider sound stage, better bass response, more separation (jazz genre). I've actually disabled lossless in settings to prove I hear some difference..... and yes I do. Thanks Apple Music!

Other than spatial audio on or off, you shouldn't be able to hear a difference between lossless and not-lossless - try and see if you have have a friend help you do a blind test. Placebo is powerful.

(I'm surprised there are not more "objectivists" on here)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: turbineseaplane
I really don't see how going from 256 AAC to lossless would make the soundstage wider with any gear. I'm also very skeptical about the bass response claim. The main difference between lossy and lossless is actually supposed to be in the highs.

The only way to test it properly is to run a blind test repeatedly: someone else has to switch lossless on and off without telling you what you are hearing, repeat many times and calculate the success rate in identifying lossless correctly.

I've run such a test on my son (an 18-years old jazz musician) using Sennheiser HD800 with iFi micro iDSD Black Label DAC/Amp. He correctly identified lossless in 8 out of 10 trials. His description of lossless vs lossy was more clarity and musicality, as if a thin layer of dust was lifted.
Thank you sir. I did just that with my wife doing the switching and I can confirm 100% it sounded different. I used mostly the jazz genre and that was the best result. But I did pop classical and r&b
 
REALLY powerful

The mind does some wonderful tricks - particularly when there's a strong bias for a user to want to believe "they have the best" and "they can hear the benefits" and "it's all worth it"
The resulting pleasure of listening to (what I know/believe is) lossless audio is real though, for me anyway, so even if it was just based on the placebo effect, that would actually be reason enough for me. :D
 
  • Like
Reactions: turbineseaplane
The resulting pleasure of listening to (what I know/believe is) lossless audio is real though, for me anyway, so even if it was just based on the placebo effect, that would actually be reason enough for me. :D

Fair enough and I don't disagree at all!

Placebo is powerful and in fact useful in many situations in life.

Enjoy!
 
  • Like
Reactions: tkermit
The resulting pleasure of listening to (what I know/believe is) lossless audio is real though, for me anyway, so even if it was just based on the placebo effect, that would actually be reason enough for me. :D

Send me a direct message. I have some wonderful placebo-based treatments to offer at perfectly reasonable prices.
 
I have an extensive collection of CDs that are not on Apple Music. Ripped some to ALAC on my Mac and added to my Apple Music Library. The files appeared on my iPhone and their sizes match those of the ALAC files on the Mac. Unfortunately, no lossless icon, but since the file sizes match, I believe it's safe to assume that local ALAC files are no longer converted to AAC when added to Apple Music Library. This is a feature I wanted for a really long time.

UPDATE: It no longer works today: uploaded ALAC files now appear as AAC on other devices and the file sizes are now much smaller than the originals. One thing that changed between yesterday and today is that I was still on MacOS 11.3.something and have upgraded to 11.4 only today. I'll try again later with another Mac that's on an older version.
 
:)

Fair enough and I don't disagree at all!

Placebo is powerful and in fact useful in many situations in life.

Enjoy!
thanks, you too!

Send me a direct message. I have some wonderful placebo-based treatments to offer at perfectly reasonable prices.
lol. Honestly, though, I'd rather be treated with a placebo than with nothing at all. Thankfully, this particular "treatment" comes for free. Admittedly, I've already spent way too much on lossless music when lossy audio was readily available to me. Oh well... there are probably worse and more costly self-delusions.
 
yes i actually agree! I can see how this feature might make more basic headphones sound better however the Airpods Max have such a decent soundstage already, you can pick out seperate insturments so well already. For me the clarity is lost as soon as you switch to Dolby Atmos. It feels too 'forced'. The bass really suffers too. Normal stereo produces a stunning intimate experience with the airpods max but everything feels unecessarily distant in Atmos with loads of reverb and poor timing. Its frustrating that they haven't matched the volume either ... almost like they've made them totally different volumes on purpose to emphasize the different modes.

I'd be interested to experience proper spatial audio with head tracking but again i think it will be a gimmick.

One benefit that might come out of this is that producers become a bit more creative with their mixing. Pop songs are so uninspiring with their use of of the soundstage. Almost a lost art from the days of classic rock where the majority of people had a decent hifi system. Away from the charts, there are some cracking tracks which make use of it, Four Tet comes to mind. Lets have more of that!
One Atmos track I’ve heard that I like is Norah Jones “Don’t Know Why”. It’s pretty stunning. So far, it’s the only one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: asr113
Golden Hour by Kacey Musgraves is one of my favourite albums of the past few years, so it seemed like one I’d hear an immediate difference in. While I can’t tell if it’s playing in spatial, I can absolutely hear the difference in lossless. It’s pristine, individual instruments are easier to pick out, and reverbs and washes have smoother blooms.

One thing that isn’t great: I had to go to the special version in Apple Music, the version in my library is still just showing as a standard Apple Digital Master. I hope they roll lossless out to existing iTunes purchases.
From what I understand, if you delete and re-download, you will get whatever version you’ve specified in Apple Music’s prefs.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.