Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Are you telling me that you have zero USB charger? How do you charge your phone now?
A LARGE number of people threw away their old chargers and cables on the 12th. I think. Or, it appears that way. They’re posting from their computers now as their phones have been dead for well over 24 hours by now, but, by gum, they’re making a STATEMENT! :)
 
  • Haha
Reactions: MartyvH
I bought a couple of those 20W chargers yesterday, because they don't come with the new iPhone ... and since I'm not sure if I'm trading in or handing my phone down like I always did in the past, naturally if I'm giving my phone to a family member I'll include the box, earbuds and cable/charger ... so I'm buying them separately.

Granted I never used the included earbuds and they stay in their packaging, I always see my family members gladly use them until they break/fray so I wouldn't consider including those in the package a waste or bad for the environment. Same goes for the charger.

Just noticed another post that Apple is including buds in France due to their laws, and I'd be curious to find out if the box is modified or in order to streamline production and "save the environment" Apple will be shipping/giving earbuds in separate boxes. ... and I'm sure just with the comments of "you have a drawer full of cables, or earbuds" because everyone knows exaclty what we have in each others homes and offices we'll be seeing comments on how antiquated laws are in France and the rest of Europe.

Of course any move to include "less waste" is a good one, I never said otherwise ... but between shipping my charger now separately, and Apple face masks individually produced, packaged, shipped, I'm not sure if the msg of "better for the environment" applies.
 
but between shipping my charger now separately, and Apple face masks individually produced, packaged, shipped, I'm not sure if the msg of "better for the environment" applies.
Production is only PART of the picture. For example, for you personally, an environmentally concerned person, you will likely recycle the eminently recyclable packaging that the charger comes in, performing the action Apple expects. Apple provides those face masks AND has procedures in place for the collection recycling of the packaging.

The ONLY things companies can really do, is make products such that they CAN be recycled easily. And, in some cases devise ways to recycle certain difficult-to-recycle products if they’re returned (as they should be). However, with a populace that just doesn’t care, even the absolutely most recyclable product can become trash.
 
Production is only PART of the picture. For example, for you personally, an environmentally concerned person, you will likely recycle the eminently recyclable packaging that the charger comes in, performing the action Apple expects. Apple provides those face masks AND has procedures in place for the collection recycling of the packaging.

The ONLY things companies can really do, is make products such that they CAN be recycled easily. And, in some cases devise ways to recycle certain difficult-to-recycle products if they’re returned (as they should be). However, with a populace that just doesn’t care, even the absolutely most recyclable product can become trash.
I get that majority of people don't care, won't recycle, etc. etc. but why in the name of "better for the enviornment" Apple simply doesn't use the masks (in many cases probably far more superior masks) manufactured by other companies like many here argue and defend with when it comes to chargers ... instead they "add" to the problem, but claim otherwise.
 
" According to Apple, the power adapter and EarPods were removed from the ‌iPhone‌ boxes to reduce the company's environmental impact, "

Impact is impact. It doesn't matter if Apple included it or not due to environmental impact...the fact that I now need to acquire a new one, that comes in a box full of paper and plastic and is manufactured somewhere on this planet is STILL IMPACT.

Honestly, I wouldn't pay for one if I opted to buy a new iPhone...I would make them give me one for free. Seriously, this is ridiculous.
I guess this balances out. I have multiple adapters and headphones and I don't need to buy one. Sure if I want fast-charging at 20 watts I need to buy another adapter, magsafe charger or ipad 12 watt power brick.

There will be those, unbelievably, that do not have the means of charging any USB device in their home/apartment/whatever. They will need a charger. Maybe these same people will need headphones also. Those will have to spring for adapter and headphones...so be it.

Interesting how you would force Apple to give you a charger and headphones for free.
 
Interesting how you would force Apple to give you a charger and headphones for free.

I don't think it was ever about getting something for free ... Apple touts they're giving us better for the same price as previously, yet exclude accessories that were included with previous releases.

Yes, unbelievably I don't have a drawer full of USB cables, and headphones, they are recycled and I don't buy 10 spare ones polutting the environment with items that I will never use ... all those shouting from the rooftops about environment protection while sporting a drawer full of accessories that they will never use are part of the problem they're trying to defend/fight ... but who am I to tell others what they have in their drawers, and what to do with their unused items ... it only works the other way around :cool:
 
If I am repeating myself its because people like you keep repeating the mantra about how wrong apple is for doing this, how you don't already have an appropriate charger. Okay. Pony up and buy one. Because regardless of whether you need it now, or tomorrow, you will need it. Apple is actually late to this party, many other devices are already USB-C. But you seem to like the cheap end of things. My iPad Pro, USB-C. My MacBook Pro, USB-C. My 6th Apple Watch sits on a charger with USB-C. And the is the point. Sooner or later you will need this. But you won't need the second one, the third one, the fourth one that will come down the line as you buy other things.

You are over reacting. Sure they save some money. But they factor that into the cost of the device. If you dont like the price. Don't buy it.
Get less than before for what you pay. Enjoy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zen_Arcade
I don't think it was ever about getting something for free ... Apple touts they're giving us better for the same price as previously, yet exclude accessories that were included with previous releases.
Depends on how you are interpreting the definition what is being "touted". It's true the iphone 12 is superior to the iphone 11 for the same price. If you are subjectively including a box of items from the iphone 11 to a box of items to the iphone 12 I still do not think that equals out. The updates to the phone trump the loss of the adapter and headphones.
Yes, unbelievably I don't have a drawer full of USB cables, and headphones, they are recycled and I don't buy 10 spare ones polutting the environment with items that I will never use ... all those shouting from the rooftops about environment protection while sporting a drawer full of accessories that they will never use are part of the problem they're trying to defend/fight ... but who am I to tell others what they have in their drawers, and what to do with their unused items ... it only works the other way around :cool:
You might be one of the few (imo) who basically have the bare minimum. My anecdotal experience is that my circle has bricks/cables/headphones in more than excess. Those are the people Apple is targeting for an environmental win. Apple probably did it's homework and determined that people without spares, such as yourself, is far and few in-between and thus taking the approach they did, with headphones and adapters is a win-win.
 
Depends on how you are interpreting the definition what is being "touted". It's true the iphone 12 is superior to the iphone 11 for the same price. If you are subjectively including a box of items from the iphone 11 to a box of items to the iphone 12 I still do not think that equals out. The updates to the phone trump the loss of the adapter and headphones.

You might be one of the few (imo) who basically have the bare minimum. My anecdotal experience is that my circle has bricks/cables/headphones in more than excess. Those are the people Apple is targeting for an environmental win. Apple probably did it's homework and determined that people without spares, such as yourself, is far and few in-between and thus taking the approach they did, with headphones and adapters is a win-win.
I somehow knew this would bring up the "better phone" for the same price and all that ... but isn't in every companys best interest to keep improving, to keep releasing better product, to stay competitive, r&d, etc. etc. Yes the phone is better, but it always has been "the best iPhone we've ever made" year after year with everything else included, now if I want to have "the best iPhone we've ever made" for the same price that simply doesn't apply ... now I would have to spend $40 extra to have, well ... the best phone we've ever made for the same price. It's not about being cheap, I already bought some chargers ... it's about the msg ... we're giving you better for the same, and while we're at it we're saving the environment - and that is not the case.
 
I somehow knew this would bring up the "better phone" for the same price and all that ... but isn't in every companys best interest to keep improving, to keep releasing better product, to stay competitive, r&d, etc. etc. Yes the phone is better, but it always has been "the best iPhone we've ever made" year after year with everything else included, now if I want to have "the best iPhone we've ever made" for the same price that simply doesn't apply ... now I would have to spend $40 extra to have, well ... the best phone we've ever made for the same price. It's not about being cheap, I already bought some chargers ... it's about the msg ... we're giving you better for the same, and while we're at it we're saving the environment - and that is not the case.
Your interpretation is the experience vs the product...fair enough. My interpretation is the product alone. However for the $40 additional dollars you get a 20w charger vs a 5w. So you can argue you are getting more for the $40.

I think this discussion is very, very nuanced.

Those that claim, on this forum, they won't buy more Apple products due to policy decisions, Android will be taking the same approach.
 
Your interpretation is the experience vs the product...fair enough. My interpretation is the product alone. However for the $40 additional dollars you get a 20w charger vs a 5w. So you can argue you are getting more for the $40.

I think this discussion is very, very nuanced.
I agree we can go on for quite some time here ... but if you were stating differences between product alone, I would also consider the means of charging the product as part of the product. Especially since Apple compared "better for the same" with iPhone 11 which in my case came with earbuds/cable/charger. Again it's all about the msg.

IMG_7548.PNG


... and speaking of the new 20W chargers ... just arrived, yay!
 
  • Like
Reactions: I7guy
I agree we can go on for quite some time here ... but if you were stating differences between product alone, I would also consider the means of charging the product as part of the product. Especially since Apple compared "better for the same" with iPhone 11 which in my case came with earbuds/cable/charger. Again it's all about the msg.

View attachment 966935

... and speaking of the new 20W chargers ... just arrived, yay!
Better is true. A 20w charger is better than what came with the iphone 11.

But I get your point as it's your opinion. I wonder how many people see your way and how many see this nuance another way?
 
  • Like
Reactions: iksretep
I get that majority of people don't care, won't recycle, etc. etc. but why in the name of "better for the enviornment" Apple simply doesn't use the masks (in many cases probably far more superior masks) manufactured by other companies like many here argue and defend with when it comes to chargers ... instead they "add" to the problem, but claim otherwise.
I mean, again ONLY if a person's concern is "better for the environment", if Apple's solution is energy efficient (If they ship the masks as a part of shipping stock instead of a separate delivery) AND, once they're used safely to the extent that they should be, Apple's recycling those and making new ones from the materials of the used ones (or sterilizing them), a person who's concerned about the environment would prefer Apple's closed and controlled loop than one that includes an external company.
but packaging it separately and shipping out separately saves the environment? lol get real.
If they were going to send out 200 million of them separately, yes. However, as a result of the change, they're VERY likely to make and ship FAR fewer than 200 million. That's not my point, it's someone else's from elsewhere in the thread, I just thought it was a good one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Michael Scrip
Yeah ok but you didn’t answer the question. How are you going to defend Apple next year when they remove the port and force people to pollute the environment by buying a massive amount of wireless chargers?

You make a good point. I think their POV is that a tranditional charger is found every where so need to make more of it, but the wireless one is the next big thing so we need to make those to go the next step in tech. Obviously I think a wireless charger is expensive to give away for free, but then how can you sell a phone that you need another product to make it work!?

Maybe its like DVD, you do buy a DVD but you need a DVD player to make it work. I doubt they are going portless any time soon, I just don't see a benefit and all the disadvantages.
 
I don't see Apple going to USB-C unless they are forced to by some government. For the iPhone there really isn't a benefit and a huge problem to the people with millions of Lightning cables and accessories. I still remember when they went from 30 pin to Lightning cable

Apple could've removed the Lightning adapter and switched to USB C some years back but didn't since that adapter is Proprietary and helps generate more money (from accessory sales).

Switching to USB C would've meant lots of lost revenue to Apple but benefited consumers, who could use the USB C cables with Other devices, which Apple does not want to happen.
 
Apple could've removed the Lightning adapter and switched to USB C some years back but didn't since that adapter is Proprietary and helps generate more money (from accessory sales).

Switching to USB C would've meant lots of lost revenue to Apple but benefited consumers, who could use the USB C cables with Other devices, which Apple does not want to happen.
Somebody makes money on the usb-c connection through licensing fees. So I think this point is moot. I don’t see much benefit right now to usb-c on iPhones.
 
Somebody makes money on the usb-c connection through licensing fees. So I think this point is moot. I don’t see much benefit right now to usb-c on iPhones.

The USB C issue was discussed before in the past on many online [forum] discussions so it's still relevant issue.
The point is that users can use the USB C cable on many other Non-Apple devices such as smartphones, tablets and laptops.

It is a relative moot point for the iPhone 12 since Apple already decided to use the USB C to Lightning cable.
 
No, you use an existing USB charger. They don't have to come from Apple or be related to the iPhone in any way. Are you telling me that you have zero USB charger? How do you charge your phone now? Use that charger.

But even if you buy a new USB-C charger you can use it for 10 years. That's one charger and maybe 3-4 phones, reducing the number of chargers produced by 1-3.
And if you did not have a USB-C brick before what do you do ? Or if you gave your phone to your son, and he needs a charger? What do you do ? There are way more scenarios that you will need to PURCHASE(key) something, in order to have a functioning device... Basically they are catering to people that had a USB-C charger already, and if you coming from any other iphone then 11 pm you wont have that charger... also if you sell, give or whatever with your old phone the next person will have to PURCHASE a charger... also going forward, when you done with this phone and sell it or w/e the next person will need a charger... again the impact might actually be worse to environment then including a proper charger for the job along with the device... earpods yes a waste, altho many people use it still to this day and new people coming pre 8 will still need to buy new headphones, but at least this does not interfere with your phone functionality or lack there of when you cant charge it out of the box with out PURCHASING or bring your own charger.. You can justify this as much as you want, but this is a terrible move and probably terrible for environment..
 
A lot of you are also missing the point about multiple charges, which people relay on the charger in box to be in the office and/or home......

But I can see that my points are not being listened to and its pointless to explain... so I will stop here and now.... what they did was ridiculous and very consumer unfriendly... most people still dont know and probably wont know until they will go to purchase the phone, or order it tomorrow and find out oh wait I dont have a charger and this cable doesnt fit in to mine, or why is it taking forever to charge my phone with this adapter i had for last 4 years... and buy a new one... all of this will not help environment one bit...
 
Apple could've removed the Lightning adapter and switched to USB C some years back but didn't
Because USB-C is only just NOW getting to the point where buying a cheap charger or cable won’t fry your device. At least with lightning, a customer that buys a “made for iOS” cable from a decent vendor is getting something that won’t destroy their device.
 
They’re actually offering $30 off for the loss of the charger if you buy through AT&T and Verizon. T-Mobile and others didn’t agree to the same deal.
This is what was suggested.

this is what has been done.
Offer $19 $30 off to compensate the loss of the charger,
By artificially jacking up the price despite showing the "$30 off" price in the keynote?
Am I missing something?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.