Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
If the sales trend of ARM-based Macs continues to grow, I'd imagine other PC manufacturers are going to start looking more into this model. X86 won't be a quick death, but if it can't shrink beyond 10nm then its days are numbered. Most consumers are not going to care what is powering their PC either.

AMD has an ARM license at least, so they'll be able to carry on, but Intel... they're really doomed. This video really summarized the genie out of the box very well.

 
I'm surprised by the lower 8 GB ram. Is that because the M1 is so power efficient that we don't need a pile of Ram?

I use my MP for photo editing (Capture One - who are working on a native M1 version) and occasional video editing (although could be more if it wasn't choppy now).

I might jump on a 27" iMac someday. Or a newer Mac Pro.
For now I'm holding on, but it's 8 years old and starting to chunk a bit with larger files (12 core, tons of Ram). I'd love to see the efficiency difference between an M1 iMac. Hopefully there will be YT reviews (by power users) soon enough.

Cheers,
Brian
As an example, an efficient application like Cinema 4D will require the same amount of memory regardless of processor platform. At the moment, my renderer is using just over 70GB of actual physical RAM. Insufficient memory just means more disk access.
 
We’re almost at the halfway mark into the two year transition period. Isn’t it weird that only M1 models have been released? I’m not on the market for a new computer, but on the other hand I’m really curious to see the more powerful chips. Yesterday’s event was a bit of a letdown on that regard.

Same for me. Just like the Intel transition, I wasn't going to run out and buy the first gens. Never works out in the long run. I'm a bit impressed at how well these M1 machines have sold thus far. Didn't expect the response they have gotten, nor the sales. I hope we'll see some differences and a staggered line up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: catean
I want to replace my 2012 Mac mini but I'm hesitant to buy the new M1 model. I'm still not sold on the M1 chip. Then there's the problem of excessive SSD wear as reported by MacRumors, or has that been addressed? I think I will get the latest i7 Mac mini while they are still available... plus they come in space-gray! :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: AAPLGeek
With the economies of scale for M1 chips spread through so many of the better selling devices, especially now with iPad Pros, it makes the M1 a great investment for Apple. For the higher end models which sell a fraction of even just one category of an M1 device, I would imagine Apple‘s more powerful SOC’s would have to go into many more products than just low volume higher end Macs to cover development and production costs. Perhaps they will go into servers as well?
 
Last edited:
It would be great if Apple used the AMD chips for Pro machines. M1 (ARM) for lowend and AMD (x86) for highend. But that's not comming so I am probably out too.
I read somewhere that they are going to continue using Xeon processors in the next Mac Pros.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blkant
I wouldn’t be surprised if the MacBook Air alone was up to 40% of all Mac sales. They’ve stated notebook form factor is 80% of Mac sales and it’s long been known the MBA is by far the best selling model. With Apple Silicon it’s got pretty much zero downsides.
 
We’re almost at the halfway mark into the two year transition period. Isn’t it weird that only M1 models have been released? I’m not on the market for a new computer, but on the other hand I’m really curious to see the more powerful chips. Yesterday’s event was a bit of a letdown on that regard.
first half the base, most sold macs with M1...and later , the other half of transition the other, the pricer ones, like the 14" /16" mbp and the bigger imac , and the transition will end with the mac pro
 
I was surprised at this at this point, since the iMac was still all Intel and you could still get Intel versions of most of the other items.

I figured Apple wouldn't reach this point till the initial iMac switched over. Have to say, the redesign doesn't bother me - but the chin is missing the Apple branding. It needs a frosted Apple logo there and doesn't look right without it.
 
Last edited:
That says a lot less about the M1 than it does about the computers they are in. The MacBook Air & MacBook Pro 13” have always been their best sellers (even with Intel processors).

Tim is trying to spin it that people are buying for the M1. In reality, there are more people buying a $600-1300 computer than a $1700-10,000 one - plain & simple
 
M1 replaced the entry level machines for Air, Pro and mini, which I assume were already the best sellers over the more expensive options in the categories so this doesn't surprise me too much.
Disagree...Don't have to purchase an expensive Mac Pro to connect an Apple Pro Display XDR so a cheaper m1 Mac Mini was purchased!...Yippee!
 
We’re almost at the halfway mark into the two year transition period. Isn’t it weird that only M1 models have been released? I’m not on the market for a new computer, but on the other hand I’m really curious to see the more powerful chips. Yesterday’s event was a bit of a letdown on that regard.
It's not weird. They said ~2 years. It's been 6 months since the first M1 was released.

I was surprised any new Macs were announced. People figured the iPad Pro and the Airtags but the rest was icing on the cake.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: brendu and progx
just add one airtag to your mac and you're done. If they bake it for you, they'll charge it to you.

I am not knowledgeable about location devices like Air Tags but if it’s visible on the outside of a computer then it’s easy to defeat. I think what Happy wants is something inside of the case that isn’t easy for someone to find/remove/disable. But that’s a guess on my part.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.