Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I mean $99…… or you could pay $29 for a near exact usb-c replica that syncs perfectly with your phone. My wife’s charging case died and apple refused warranty and wanted $129 to replace the charging case.

Went to eBay and bought a replica that works IDENTICAL to the original for $29 shipped. They have been working flawlessly for over a year with every single feature.
$99 is ridiculous. It should be $49.99 maybe even $59.99 for the apple tax.
Does that case also replicate the same find my features?

Of course its worth mentioning that its super easy to sell a cheap knockoff since you are stealing the design and have minimal operational costs.
 
This is going to be monumentally confusing now to know which revision of "airpods pro 2nd gen" someone has

They should have just called the newer version 3rd gen

It didn’t have enough new features justices being marketed as the third iteration of AirPods Pro. Better than having an entire generation of AirPods, only to find them virtually indistinguishable from what they already have.
 
  • Like
Reactions: spcopsmac21
Yeah I started to get excited as well BUT dig a little deeper and even at $99, it is pointless for us with 1st Gens as it does state AirPods Pro 2 Case.
That's an important detail. Thanks for highlighting it.
 
Why would anyone buy these? AirPods Pro have wireless charging. Put the $99 toward something nice for the spouse!
Oh my lord… People complained SOOO much that Apple should have released a standalone case and now when they do people STILL complain. Let’s just get on the internet and bash our heads around for no reason. The majority of these kinds of things never actually affect the people who complain.
 
Oh my lord… People complained SOOO much that Apple should have released a standalone case and now when they do people STILL complain. Let’s just get on the internet and bash our heads around for no reason. The majority of these kinds of things never actually affect the people who complain.
I'd hate to be your spouse on Christmas! What are you getting them, a bowling ball with your name engraved on it? Grinch…
 
I never wirelessly charge anything I own if I don’t have to. I think some people like wireless. I like not wasting energy and even more not ruining my battery for the one second it takes to plug in a cable.
It's not going to damage your battery, it charges at 5 watts which isn't nearly enough to heat up the battery.
 
no standalone case on sale- complaints that Apple isn’t letting customers who already invested $250 in APP2 decide between Lightning and USB-C

standalone case on sale- complaints about e-waste

typical day on this forum, nothing is ever a true win for the consumer!
Replaceable batteries would be a true win for the consumer (and the environment) … and put an end to the AirPods hardware subscription model
 
I mean $99…… or you could pay $29 for a near exact usb-c replica that syncs perfectly with your phone. My wife’s charging case died and apple refused warranty and wanted $129 to replace the charging case.

Went to eBay and bought a replica that works IDENTICAL to the original for $29 shipped. They have been working flawlessly for over a year with every single feature.
$99 is ridiculous. It should be $49.99 maybe even $59.99 for the apple tax.
It's always cheaper to copy something because you don't have to sink in the R&D into it.
 
I am guessing this means when and/if my AirPods Pro 2's lightning case needs to be replaced, Apple will replace it with the USB-C version? Apple Store no longer lists the lightning version.
Apple knows exactly how many Air Pod Pros are out there under warranty on any given day and have the appropriate amount of correct replacements on hand. Remember, Cook is the king of supply chain.
 
It's always cheaper to copy something because you don't have to sink in the R&D into it.
That’s true. But it didn’t cost apple $12,000,000,000 to switch to usbc on the headphones case.
$99.99 is a radically insane price point. They would still be making fistfuls of cash if it were priced at say $59.99 and it would drive significantly more people towards buying the real thing than the cheaper alternative. Now wouldn’t it?
They are pricing a significant portion of their customers out of purchases.
Turns out $249 for wireless earbuds is kinda pricy. Especially when my family and I can’t seem to keep the over 6 sets we’ve owned since they line up launched alive longer than a little over a year. I’ve spent almost $1700 on AirPods for my family alone in four years. That’s not fun.
And then charging $100 to replace the charging case when it’s a glorified find my tag with a usb c port on it and an internal $3 battery.
I love apple products, been with apple since the early 2000s.
But things are changing at apple and I’m finding myself buying less and less of their products. I can afford them easily, but I don’t have to. Not when alternatives exist that accomplish the same end goal. For much…much less.
 
Last edited:
  • Love
Reactions: turbineseaplane
That’s true. But it didn’t cost apple $12,000,000,000 to switch to usbc on the headphones case.
$99.99 is a radically insane price point. They would still be making fistfuls of cash if it were priced at say $59.99 and it would drive significantly more people towards buying the real thing than the cheaper alternative. Now wouldn’t it?
They are pricing a significant portion of their customers out of purchases.
Turns out $249 for wireless earbuds is kinda pricy. Especially when my family and I can’t seem to keep the over 6 sets we’ve owned since they line up launched alive longer than a little over a year. I’ve spent almost $1700 on AirPods for my family alone in four years. That’s not fun.
And then charging $100 to replace the charging case when it’s a glorified find my tag with a usb c port on it and an internal $3 battery.
I love apple products, been with apple since the early 2000s.
But things are changing at apple and I’m finding myself buying less and less of their products. I can afford them easily, but I don’t have to. Not when alternatives exist that accomplish the same end goal. For much…much less.
Hmm, it's never easy buying for the entire family. Here's my thoughts.

1) How's the quality of the third party AirPods case you get online? I don't think Apple intends for their AirPods user base to immediately run out and replace their existing charging cases with this. It's a low volume product, designed for replacements or for the small number who really want that usb-c port to streamline their charging setup, but can't justify getting a brand new set of AirPods.

2) AirPods by their very nature have a set lifespan (because they house such small batteries). If you can't see yourself replacing them every 2 years, I would advise against them. And usually, it's the batteries in the AirPods themselves that will die out first, not the one in the case.

3) I don't see many people buying the cases on their own unless they really want usb-c charging with their AirPods Pro. Myself, I am using the current 2nd gen and plan to just wait for V3 to be released and then upgrade all at one go.

4) I suspect these products, as with so many of Apple's pricing decisions, is designed to maximise profit. You are right in that Apple may sell more if only their prices were lower, but it may not necessarily result in the most amount of money made. This isn't the iPhone, where pricing it competitively can get more users into the ecosystem and get them buying other accessories like the Apple Watch.

5) My experience with Apple is a bit different. I find myself buying less, but not because they suck or are more expensive. I am just happy with the apple products that I currently do still use, have no intention of going beyond the ecosystem, and will still be upgrading to future Apple products. Just maybe not as often.
 
  • Like
Reactions: spcopsmac21
It didn’t have enough new features justices being marketed as the third iteration of AirPods Pro. Better than having an entire generation of AirPods, only to find them virtually indistinguishable from what they already have.
If that’s the case, then I don’t think they should have bothered updating them when they switched to USB-C. It creates a mess for customers, like with the current iPad lineup and the 3 Apple TV related products: Apple TV 4K hardware, the Apple TV app and the Apple TV+ streaming service.
 
$99 is quite costly for the case alone. Maybe better to buy AirPods 2 as a backup instead of spending $99 for a USB C case.
 
I normally charge mine wirelessly and much as I’d like to move completely to USB-C, I have other devices that need lightning (AirPods Max, Magic Keyboard and mouse for starters) and $99 doesn’t represent great value for money so I think I’ll pass on this!
 
  • Like
Reactions: turbineseaplane
Now we need all the other accessories converted. And a case for $99 when you can have the full setup with updated pods for $189 as they've been on sale many times already. Also not available until after Christmas so people will just buy the whole set.


If you by from a small business like me you can likely get before Christmas and cut down on wire clutter and waste at same time :)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.