they didn’t want to do a ‘simple’ one: there are plentyApple can't do a simple wireless charging mat, wow! They have to do an imposible wireless charging mat with is ... imposible to make.
Yeah - this product could have been hot stuff - and some people were really wired about it. This doesn't induce much confidence in Apple.
I would think the way to do it would be to make a 2D array comprised of a lot of small coils and then, somehow detecting the location of the device to be charged, only energize those coils. Having one large coil would just result in a lot of wasted magnetic flux that didn't overlap with the device's coil.Apple's idea was to use one large coil to be able to do power delivery to as much devices you could fit on it.
So far, nobody has been able to do this.
Other multi-device charging stations use independent coils for each device that require specific placement.
I'll give em credit for trying to be innovative. unfortunately they picked something that we currently don't have the means to accomplish
It’s not a matter of imagining anything. I was asking what your cutoff is.A charging mat is functionally identical to a wired connection. The only difference is a slight convenience boost in not having to plug it in. Imagine your laptop was advertised with "wireless internet" but only if you kept it on top of the router.
I would think the way to do it would be to make a 2D array comprised of a lot of small coils and then, somehow detecting the location of the device to be charged, only energize those coils. Having one large coil would just result in a lot of wasted magnetic flux that didn't overlap with the device's coil.
That's NOTHING like airpower.
If this image is from Apple it should have been posted in main article.You don’t understand what Apple was trying to do with AirPower. Nobody has been able to do it. Apple thought they had it. They didn’t.
It was a “charge anywhere” mat. Place three devices anywhere on the mat, not just in very specific spots. Not 3 isolated coils, 22 overlapping coils.
No one has done it, and now we know Apple has given up trying.
View attachment 829356
Which Belkin wireless charging pad does what the image in post 909 shows?Fair point. It just seems such a shambles and, I would have thought producing something that Belkin can produce (but better) wouldn't be too much of a stretch for Apple. I think it was a mistake to announce it without knowing when it would be ready.
What about the people who ordered AirPods with wireless charging under the assumption that AirPower was following. Seems like a cluster...
Ultimately it's CEO who decides.I do wonder who was the final say on announcing this at the keynote? Was marketing pressuring engineering or did the hardware engineering teams promise something they couldn’t deliver? Dan Riccio made the announcement but we don’t know if he’s just the fall guy or if his team really did screw up.
I mean, realistically someone convinced him this was a good idea. However, Tim Cook ultimately has to give the go ahead. I do think this would be a case where someone in Phil Schiller's department might fall on the sword, though.Ultimately it's CEO who decides.
Well it is not 22 coils, Choetech makes a 5 coil that is probably 1/5 the cost of what the Airpower would have been and helps to solve the issue of having to precisely place the unit on the pad.You don’t understand what Apple was trying to do with AirPower. Nobody has been able to do it. Apple thought they had it. They didn’t.
It was a “charge anywhere” mat. Place three devices anywhere on the mat, not just in very specific spots. Not 3 isolated coils, 22 overlapping coils.
No one has done it, and now we know Apple has given up trying.
View attachment 829356
That's provably false though. Near-field charging (pad based wireless) is just as wireless as mid-field and far-field. They vary by the distance of effective charging. You may be mistaking near-field for contact charging. They aren't the same. Our old buddies Energous, with a helping had from Dialog Semi, are going to bring mid-field to market soon with some strategic OEM partnerships. Even then, the charge levels will be little more than trickle charge. But near-field is true wireless by any and every definition. If it wasn't you couldn't charge through cases.Sure. Technology does not advance overnight. I just say pad-based wireless charging is not true wireless charging. That is all. Maybe one day in the future we will get there, having a battery emitting electrical power to charge many devices within a range.
Yeah, let's bust out the violin for people who rushed to pre-order a product using an accessory that wasn't even released yet. You know what they say about people who assume things....
Obviously. But I haven’t seen one that’s elegant enough to charge all three of my devices. Buying individual chargers looks bad and looks like a cluster****.
Since I intended it to sit on my nightstand, I want it to match aesthetically with the rest of my home. Other Qi chargers don’t charge with an Apple Watch, unless you have one that has an Apple Watch charger built in, but I’ve yet to find a product that looks modern or minimalistic.
10 years from now all your tech will charge from anywhere, all the time. No cables, silly pads, or other nonsense. Airpower will be as obsolete as a floppy drive.