Too bad (an)other monitors are so blatantly ugly and distract you from your work.
P.S. Really saddens me to see how Apple is slowly leaving the pro desktop sector.
LOL. I never heard of an ugly monitor distracting someone from their work before.
I remember getting a 13" NTSC monitor for my Commodore 64 back around 1984 and thinking how much better it was than using a blurry TV set as a monitor. Then there was my first RGB monitor, a Commodore 1084S (s for stereo speakers) I first used with my Amiga 500 around 1989. Good times. I'm glad I was distracted by their sheer ugliness. Then I got an Amiga 3000 (with a whopping 5MB of ram!) and it had a de-interlacer so I got my first 15" multi-sync monitor (it could handle both the NTSC and VGA modes). I went through a few of these in the '90s as they only tended to last about 2-3 years each before they utterly failed. Ironically, I ended up with a 20" CRT Dell with my first Mac which is now connected to both the old Amiga 3000 and my Mac Netbook. It might be ugly, but it still works.
Let's see, I have an 22" AOC flatscreen connected to my PowerMac and both a 20" NEC Mulit-sync CRT and a 24" LG flatscreen connected to my PC and another 24" LG flatscreen as a dock for my MBP. I don't think any of them are "ugly" but then I look at the picture, not the trim (usually polished or unpolished black, which looks very undistracting to me and more importantly their screens are matte, which means no reflections which means less distraction still).
Maybe you could ask your doctor about ADD?
