Why not? Where do you think the money will come from?but 9,99 when buying 1000$+ phone
Why not? Where do you think the money will come from?but 9,99 when buying 1000$+ phone
I also have a little secret for you. Apple has changed the design of the iPhone since they removed the charger. That means the cost of that charger is now rolled into the phone... Also there's this thing called inflation that seems to make everything more expensive. People expect the price of iPhone to stay the same for five years but that means they have to cut costs. It's going to show up with this iPhone for sure. They either had to cut production costs or raise the price.I got a little secret for you. Apple hasn't lowered the price for the iPhone when they removed the charger, that btw costs 20 bucks separately. So you are still technically paying for the charger, but you don't get it anymore.
How many people responding here don't have a drawer full of 5W bricks? Maybe they should have clear on what they were selling. But my TV doesn't come with electricity or my car with a credit card to buy gas. Some may just use the MagSafe charger. Total waste to include a brick with an iPhone.
How many free bags should you get on an airline flight?
I also have a little secret for you. Apple has changed the design of the iPhone since they removed the charger. That means the cost of that charger is now rolled into the phone... Also there's this thing called inflation that seems to make everything more expensive. People expect the price of iPhone to stay the same for five years but that means they have to cut costs. It's going to show up with this iPhone for sure. They either had to cut production costs or raise the price.
And I don't know if it's worse to have removed it without a price drop, or it costing $20 if the one previous poster was correct that it only costs $1 to make. I understand profit but not 20x!I got a little secret for you. Apple hasn't lowered the price for the iPhone when they removed the charger, that btw costs 20 bucks separately. So you are still technically paying for the charger, but you don't get it anymore.
They also didn't raise the price when their margins went down. So there is that.I got a little secret for you. Apple hasn't lowered the price for the iPhone when they removed the charger, that btw costs 20 bucks separately. So you are still technically paying for the charger, but you don't get it anymore.
Yes there's always going to be people getting their first. Not everyone has a bag full of cords and bricks.So much wrong with every one of those comparisions
Just totally off base
But you can have anywhere from people like me with a bag full of previous adapters and cable to people buying their very first smartphone with nothing for charging.
from the iPhone. accessories is like nothing in Apple earnings reports.Why not? Where do you think the money will come from?
Very few devices that I have bought that charge with a usb type connection come with a power brick. Charging bricks imo are almost ubiquitous.How many people responding here don't have a drawer full of 5W bricks? Maybe they should have clear on what they were selling. But my TV doesn't come with electricity or my car with a credit card to buy gas. Some may just use the MagSafe charger. Total waste to include a brick with an iPhone.
How many free bags should you get on an airline flight?
And I don't know if it's worse to have removed it without a price drop, or it costing $20 if the one previous poster was correct that it only costs $1 to make. I understand profit but not 20x!
But you can have anywhere from people like me with a bag full of previous adapters and cable to people buying their very first smartphone with nothing for charging.
I do think it's better to not include but they should make new buyers more aware that it isn't included and let them buy one if they need/wantBut it doesn't have to work for everyone!
Apple doesn't care if a few people has to buy a cable or a new charger. Or a few stays off iPhones because of this policy.
If Apple can reduce the number of chargers they produce significantly, it's a success for them. Nothing reduces carbon footprint like not producing something.
Or, one could buy one and have it forever.They could’ve at least included an USB-A to USB-C adapter in the package, so that the included cable is usable with the huge pile of USB-A chargers we all have. And no, the adapter is not expensive if it’s made to only transmit power and no data.
This is true. For some reason they always come with cables though... I bought a $99 Bluetooth speaker and it comes with this silly short cable.Very few devices that I have bought that charge with a usb type connection come with a power brick. Charging bricks imo are almost ubiquitous.
But then again, Apple products haven't gone up like 40% like some of the food items. Of course I wouldn't say no to a discount for not including the chargerI got a little secret for you. Apple hasn't lowered the price for the iPhone when they removed the charger, that btw costs 20 bucks separately. So you are still technically paying for the charger, but you don't get it anymore.
I have several chargers at home and most of them have USB-C in them. This includes the mac book air charger. iPad Pro charger. iPad Air charger. Home pod mini brick, chargers from costco, chargers from Best Buy, etc. there are just so many and I needed them for so many things. Oculus quest comes with usb-c cable but no brick. Did anyone sue Meta?The whole environment angle was always a moot point considering they are including a cable that does not even work with the charger supposedly everyone already has at home and therefore they r producing even more waste by including said cable
Every device has come with the proper cable even if the length is a little useless sometimes.This is true. For some reason they always come with cables though... I bought a $99 Bluetooth speaker and it comes with this silly short cable.