Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Of course Steve Jobs wouldn't have allowed this. But Tim Cook isn't running Apple the way Steve Jobs would have because Jobs told Cook to don't second guess himself and to "never ask what I would do. Just do what's right." Jobs didn't want Cook to waste time thinking and talking about what Jobs would do.

Apparently, Cook thinks running these obnoxious ads is what'$ right. :rolleyes:
Actually, my understanding is that the board of directors decides and the CEO executes the decision.
 
Personal responsibility is its own argument, but I feel like even having casino apps being shown without specifically searching for them is an issue as it is. They should at least be tagged with a prominent “Gambling” label.

Apple keeps its tight grip on the App Store for the supposed sake of user safety, but they’ll happily accept ad revenue from Apps which people have surely destroyed their lives over.
It’s like TV networks showing ads for rated R/MA content showing on their network during TV-G programming. And liquor ads, and ads for embarrassing or gross medications with graphic descriptions and warnings.

For better or worse, there was a reason for the production code, network censors, bans on alcohol and drug ads, and family hour.
 
Dunno about that. I've been playing RPG's ever since forever. My character has a habit entering people's house uninvited and rummaging through their dressers/treasure chests/barrels for items. In front of the occupants no less.😲 I've been at for over 40 years. Not once have I had to urge to do this in real life.😉

I've played plenty of shoot 'em up FPS (started with Castle Wolfenstein) as well. Never shot anyone in my life.

Parents did their job. Good thing too. If they didn't, I'd probably be doing time for running a saw across a fat guy's head. Nyuk-nyuk-nyuk.
Same here.

I would argue that playing games actually improves my hand-eye coordinations when I was young and improved my strategic thinking skills. Much better than sitting in front of a box staring blankly hours on end.

Loot boxes is fine IMHO, as companies need to make money somehow based on their business model. It's the children that needs to be educated on the values.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: ApplesAreSweet&Sour
Two things:

1) "Paused"? Really, Apple? You're just going to wait until this blows over and then re-instate them? **** you.

2) MacRumors, maybe a separate story for the "pause" update is merited, so analysis such as mine isn't drowned out by responses to the initial article. That is, it's bad enough they put these sort of ads (or any ads) into the app store on a premium phone, but it's a whole 'nother level of baloney to say they're "pausing" this and expecting the backlash to die down.

Hell no, we won't go.
 
I know this has already been stated this in one way or another but seriously, these ads are (were) unhinged.

Let’s hope someone at Apple takes a deep breath here, and not while they are downwind from one of their ginormous piles of cash…

1666843366084.jpeg


Might be time for Scrooge McCook to have a visit from the ghost of Christmas future…
 
  • Like
Reactions: Violet_Antelope
What's worse, uninvited gambling apps or the fact that most of those Apps icons look better suited for Candy Crush and are clearly intended to encourage downloads by minors?

Apple might as well sell strawberry flavored vapes to the kids while they're at it. :confused:

At the very least there should be a reporting tool in the "ad" icon
 
Last edited:
100s of people committed suicide in India since pandemic period because of Gambling and money lending apps. Most of them were android users. Looks like Apple want to be on the pole position there as well. Shame on you Tim!
 
It’s pretty shameful for all the Apple executives to expose children to ads promoting an activity that can have real negative impact on peoples lives.

You’re right, of course, but people should be mindful that this is exactly the kind of talk that will have EU meddlers and their wide eyed peers salivating over as a rationale to have facial biometrics and centrally controlled AI doing age verification checks in every app at every turn. Including Safari etc. Won’t someone please think of the children is currently the favourite tagline for wannabe technocrats. I’m finding myself saying this increasingly recently…be careful what you wish for…the genie won’t go back in the bottle.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FriendlyMackle
There needs to be an opt-in or opt-out choice for these ads.
At the very least, devices bought pre this AppStore ad-scheme should be free of it.

The AppStore is a part of any Mac, iPhone, and iPad, and I certainly wouldn’t have gotten them if I knew Apple was heading in this direction for its products.

They’re completely overpriced if they’ll end up just as ad-ridden as any non-Apple product.

Yes, that’s maybe hysterical at this early stage.

But exactly what’s keeping Apple from implementing more ads across its OSs, in any other app or UI elements?

I’m pretty sure all of Apple’s TOSs have wording that allows it to do basically anything. We just assumed certain things were off-limits because of the “Apple tax” on every Apple product and all of the “privacy” and “socially aware” vibes they like to give off in their presentations.

I hope we weren’t completely wrong. 😕
 
Last edited:
First we, Apple users, laugh at the hellhole that is the Google Play Store. And now we also have plenty of scam apps and cheap looking ads for gambling apps.

Thanks Apple. I feel great about buying into your luxurious walled ecosystem. This is nothing more than a quick money grab that cheapens your entire brand. While not being able to keep the bad stuff out of the store, as previously promised.

Very bad marketing.
 
It has to be paid for.
I thought the premium prices for the hardware partly took care of that.
And the premium developer-accounts.
And the 15%/30%-app-store-cuts.
At the beginning of the year it was reported that Apple paid out 60 billion dollars to app-store-developers.
So Apple's cut made something between 10 (15%) to 25 billion (30%) dollars just from the app-store.
In one year.
Does the app-store really, REALLY, cost that much and more in maintenance, support, improvement, app-reviewing etc.?

I'm assuming these ads do not appear to children:rolleyes:
Well...
I’m seeing gambling ads on a popular children’s education app here in Australia for children aged 2-13 (Reading Eggs).
 
  • Angry
Reactions: Violet_Antelope
What's worse, uninvited gambling apps or the fact that most of those Apps icons look better suited for Candy Crush and are clearly intended to encourage downloads by minors?

Apple might as well sell strawberry flavored vapes to the kids while they're at it. :confused:

At the very least there should be a reporting tool in the "ad" icon
Wouldn’t your appropriately set parental controls filter out all apps that are for 18+ only? I don’t see how children would ever be exposed to gambling ads unless parents had not setup parental controls properly. Correct me if I’m wrong.
 
I'm sure eventually Apple will want to monetize some of their other services to try to please shareholders. I can picture a future with iMessage ads, for example, as much as that might seem impossible now.

Every year, Apple becomes more and more like all the other tech giants, and not in good ways. Can't say I'm shocked though, all shareholders want is services revenue.
I’ve been saying Apple is becoming a trash company for years but people still defend them.

I’m a long time supporter of Apple but since Tim Cook took over they have become less and less likeable.

They’re just all about the bottom line now and trying to mug off its customer base.

This whole ad fiasco shows they are really scraping the barrel now.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.