MiFare/FeliCa stored value is dead or dying, at least in the US and Europe. It's contactless now; look at London's transition away from stored-value.
Contactless transit is not EMV. Transit use simply records the card number and at the end of the day, the taps are reconciled and the appropriate charge made. Contactless transit doesn't actually make an EMV transaction at the point of use.
The issue with stored value are the costs to transit operators to manage customer deposits and comply with laws and regulations, such as unclaimed property and anti-money laundering. Then there's accounting, card distribution, and fraud/hacking inherent in the systems. Transit operators have realized these costs are much higher than having banks do it and aren't interested in the time and effort of running a bank on the side.
TfL doesn't want Oyster to be in any of your wallets. Simply, contactless costs them less.
https://londonist.com/london/transport/state-of-the-oyster-card
To be fair, it has happened often enough with me and others with the tickets that TfL dispenses from its machines. I don't think this will eradicate the problem of uncooperative gates completely but it should help.Not to mention that after some period of time there’s inevitably an instance when Face ID doesn’t authenticate. I can’t think of any public transportation system in the world where I’d want to be at the turnstile fumbling to re-authenticate with a long line of busy travelers behind me.
We understand Japan's issues. But London has issues that make your "pre-paid debit cards can make Oyster redundant" factually untrue.
Oyster cards are still very much still needed in Apple Wallet, for sure.
Unemployed get their travel cards within them, for example, given to them directly rather than cash value. They're not going to be using prepaid debit cards just for this.
And huge amount of others use travel cards within Oyster card too, often paid for by employers, or through schemes: pre paid debit cards don't solve these issues.
So saying they will in ALL circumstances is just not true.
Oh, and then there's the Freedom Pass, that people like my mother who's retired gets; they're going to need an Oyster-like card to access TfL services within Apple Wallet too. Debit cards don't solve for that either.
So you are a fellow Harrow Borough resident!How random - I also use the 140 and 114 bus regularly!
Not to mention that after some period of time there’s inevitably an instance when Face ID doesn’t authenticate. I can’t think of any public transportation system in the world where I’d want to be at the turnstile fumbling to re-authenticate with a long line of busy travelers behind me.
It sounds exactly like the Transit Benefit Cards we get here in the US. These are regular debit cards though in the US but can only be used for transit. Some are contactless and can be tapped at a fare gate that takes EMV taps like ones in New York or Chicago. The card has a MasterCard logo on them.We understand Japan's issues. But London has issues that make your "pre-paid debit cards can make Oyster redundant" factually untrue.
Oyster cards are still very much still needed in Apple Wallet, for sure.
Unemployed get their travel cards within them, for example, given to them directly rather than cash value. They're not going to be using prepaid debit cards just for this.
And huge amount of others use travel cards within Oyster card too, often paid for by employers, or through schemes: pre paid debit cards don't solve these issues.
So saying they will in ALL circumstances is just not true.
Oh, and then there's the Freedom Pass, that people like my mother who's retired gets; they're going to need an Oyster-like card to access TfL services within Apple Wallet too. Debit cards don't solve for that either.
The card reader has firmware to let the phone know it’s a transit reader not a regular card reader. Express transit at say a Best Buy could be bad.im surprised this has to be enabled on the receivers end.
i used it on a ride in NYC for the subway and express function worked just fine. i had assumed it just worked.
i had the opposite experience tbh.Used this yesterday in NYC in one of the stations that's part of the trial.
I was skeptical of this at first because I thought you had to authenticate like you do with regular Apple Pay and it would slow down turnstiles. It is slightly slower than using a MetroCard -- there's a bit of a pause as you hold your phone up to the sensor and it registers. MetroCard is one incredibly fast movement once you're a regular user. But, you have to assume that in the final incarnation the sensor for your phone would be in a sensible place instead of awkwardly low where it is in this trial.
Anyway, I'm pretty much won over. It's quick enough, and I got 2% back because of the Apple Card. I hope they expand it soon.
i had the opposite experience tbh.
i literally walked up to the OMNY reader, held my watch up next to it and walked through (i currently have my Apple Card as the default express transit card). no double tapping the side button. i didnt use my phone so no need to authenticate or hold it up correctly. i literally just lifted my hand up by the reader and it glowed green and i was through...
much better than Metrocards where I have to swipe... then swipe again... then swipe again at the same turnstile.
To add, it's actually a safety issue, not being "lazy".
The gateline is a funnel point and they are engineered to allow a certain number of people per minute to pass through smoothly. Stations are engineered with this flow capacity, from the street entrance all the way down to the platforms and trains.
Stoppages and backups can lead to overcrowding, then stampedes and crushing which have resulted in death. If an exit line causes backups all the way down to a platform, somebody could fall in front of a train and be killed.
If people have to use Face ID, adding seconds per person, that represents a significant drop in capacity and would have to re-engineer stations and gatelines to accommodate.
But that's exactly my point. Where is TfL's pre-paid debit card for the unemployed, retired, season card holders, etc... oh look, it's nowhere to be seen, and AFAICS will never be done. And the private sector have no imperative to suddenly do one just for this purpose either (unless TfL magically gave them an impetus to; super unlikely!).Literally everything you said “can’t be done” by prepaid cards could be done by prepaid cards, if MasterCard were so inclined to develop one for use on TfL.
Yeah but would TfL ever offer one, directly or indirectly? I can't see it, as they've literally done nothing to solve for the issue in all these years so far.It sounds exactly like the Transit Benefit Cards we get here in the US. These are regular debit cards though in the US but can only be used for transit. Some are contactless and can be tapped at a fare gate that takes EMV taps like ones in New York or Chicago. The card has a MasterCard logo on them.
certainly this is something in the works for TfL if they go the same route. They can still “lock” a MasterCard to certain categories only like transit only.
You don't have to wait till you're at the turnstile/gate to authenticate with Face ID or Touch ID. In fact, it's bad to do it that way because its much slower and wastes time. Pre-authenticate before you approach the gate!
I am familiar with Octopus. Asian countries are different from the West because of the lower penetration of bank accounts and cards, due to lower incomes but also culture. Asia tends to be cash-heavy far beyond the West.
Japan in particular has western levels of banking and credit cards, but nobody actually uses electronic payments, hence relatively high use of stored value systems. Basically, electronic payments were forced upon them by transit, so it gets used for small-value transactions. This is part of the "Galápagos syndrome" of Japan, they do things differently due to culture so their systems are not necessarily exportable.
The opposite would be Singapore, which does have high penetration of contactless credit/debit for all kinds of transactions, and now has contactless transit. In Singapore, you use full EMV contactless where the Japanese use their IC cards.
Basically, the other poster doesn't understand that Japan has a problem: that Japanese refuse to use card payments even though their banking system is perfectly fine for this, and their invented solution: use of transit cards to stand in as a low-value debit card. And that problem doesn't apply to most Western countries who use cards just fine, and therefore there is no need to adopt a stored-value solution here.
And the private sector have no imperative to suddenly do one just for this purpose either (unless TfL magically gave them an impetus to; super unlikely!).
Thus we're back to the need for a digital Oyster card solution again, for these groups of users.
^^^This.If only people would figure out that Touch ID and Face ID can be authenticated before arriving at the gateline, Apple Pay would be just as fast as using a physical EMV card. D’oh.
What does that have to do with anything? Cubic Transportation and Scheidt & Bachmann does pretty much every single transit system in the US too, and we have the specialized cards. The same fare gates are used in SF and they have benefit cards. It CAN be done.Oyster is the private sector. There may be a “need” but it’s not necessarily more likely to happen
https://tfl.gov.uk/info-for/media/press-releases/2014/july/tfl-and-cubic-continue-partnership
-- Japan has one of the highest usage rates of bankcards both pre and postpaid in the world, to the point where there is a whole division of Ministry of Finance dedicated to "Cashless payment instruments." (It's one of the reasons why the uptake and legal regulation of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Etherium is so easily done and why most businesses in this space have offices here.)
In the event of a power outage or simply being out of mobile coverage doesn't stop Felica based transactions from being able to be validated by on board equipment, whereas EMV based cards will always need "outside" validation for their transactions because of the methods the actual network and transaction communications use. Unless Visa or MasterCard develop some sort of similar trustless token based transaction scheme that says "This card is good for at least 1000 yen locally, but anything beyond will need a network to verify", this problem will exist and add to the communications overhead.
People use electronic payments all the time and to say otherwise is pure baloney! There hasn't been a such thing as paper checks in forever because even grandma pays the rent with a bank to bank transfer.
The other poster was trying to tell you the "Japan invented solution" is older than EMV and Apple Pay itself so of course it would be hard to change to some other solution-- but moreover, why should Japan change to something inferior?
What does that have to do with anything? Cubic Transportation and Scheidt & Bachmann does pretty much every single transit system in the US too, and we have the specialized cards. The same fare gates are used in SF and they have benefit cards. It CAN be done.
Try reading. You’ve missed a step.
No, you missed something. TfL writes the specs and Cubic does it. Chicago's Ventra is a similar PPP by the exact same vendor Cubic and they do support passes on contactless as well as prepaid cards. It sounds like you're giving the common British complaint that if something is broken it's solely due to privatization.
the point was that tfl won’t develop a digital Oyster card, because they don’t operate the system in the first place. It’s done on their behalf, and a contract for that is in place already.