why this is fake
IMHO, this is a fake, and here is why I think so:
the video is in two segments. The Palm IIIc only has 8MB RAM, and this video would have taken more than 8MB ram to play, so the author had to cut his hoax into two segments to avoid showing him loading the second video from his G4.
near the end of the second video, he drags a window, but the dragging motion does not follow his pen. I think it actually jumps ahead sometimes. It is like this with other things as well. Clicks are registered soomer sometimes and later other times.
we never get a clear shot of the bottom of the unit where the business end of the HD connects to the business end of the Palm. I doubt it even does. If this were my hack, it would be one of the main things I would show off instead of twiddling my thumbs waiting for it to start up.
on startup, the screen says "loading L2 Cache". does the Palm IIIc even have L2 cache? Granted, a hacked version of Mac OS X may say it is doing something when it really isn't, but I thought it was worth pointing out.
On the other hand, I have heard of Mac OS X being compiled for 68K processors for experimental purposes, and isn't this what the Palm IIIc has?
There is no way you can differentiate between 256 colors and thousands of colors from this video. In fact, the .jpg that was posted looks like it is in fact running in 256 colors.
Well, I still think it is a fake, but with a little stronger evidence (and better lighting), I would be willing to retract my statement.