Originally posted by Macrumors
While it may simply be speculation, one columnist claims "there's good reason to believe that a jazzy new Newton II will be forthcoming, perhaps in January" from Apple.
Originally posted by electric
I dont need a new Newton, my 2100 is working great, a tad bit over sized but extreamly reliable, infact I just used mine this morning for an alarm clock.
Originally posted by iPC
It's on the market already...
http://www.tapwave.com/index.asp
Once again, Apple will not be first. Hopefully, as before, they will be best (iPod is a great example).
Originally posted by arn
The Newton 2000 was the last revision of the Newton. Released in 1997 or so.
Those are videos I recorded myself.
arn
Originally posted by JohnStrass
Actually, the 2100 was the last version. I bought it 1 week after the opening of the Apple store on -line, with Jobs saying "oh, thats so cool, I have to buy two". Then he killed it 2 months later.
Originally posted by brainless
If they stick to planned feature set and deliver this next year, Apple have to react, or there will be no market for iPod.
Sorry, let me rephrase. Do you have the same concerns about this writer as some other people on the forum have, and does that play a role in story location and with this just being a blurb with nothing (from what I can see) to back it up, does this play a role in the story location on MacRumors?Originally posted by arn
Because complaints don't decide where stories go.
arn
Originally posted by ejb190
I realize Apple probably won't enter the PDA market anytime soon. But let's play "what if?"
What if Apple did decde to get back into the PDA market? Apple has a tradition of re-inventing how a particular product functions, is perceived, and even how it functions. If instance, the iMac changed the notion of an entry level computer being boring and unfunctional. iLife brought "professional" tasks like video editing to a point where anyone could do it. And the iPod is, well, it's the iPod.
So how can the PDA be reinvented? What function or task is missing from the current crop of devices? What would make a PDA the next "must have" device?
Originally posted by brainless
Unlike iPod, it is also SmartPhone/PDA and VideoPlayer and it plans to use Optical removable drive insted of harddrive.
Originally posted by Jerry Spoon
Sorry, let me rephrase. Do you have the same concerns about this writer as some other people on the forum have, and does that play a role in story location and with this just being a blurb with nothing (from what I can see) to back it up, does this play a role in the story location on MacRumors?
Originally posted by JohnStrass
Actually, the 2100 was the last version. I bought it 1 week after the opening of the Apple store on -line, with Jobs saying "oh, thats so cool, I have to buy two". Then he killed it 2 months later.
Anyhow, it still gives me smile when I dust it off, but its dead now. It was ideal as a laptop replacement, EXTREMELY lightweight, great add-on keyborard.
I really should give it away so some fanatic who would give it a loving home...
Originally posted by ejb190
I realize Apple probably won't enter the PDA market anytime soon. But let's play "what if?"
But he's Devorak...he invented the keyboard! He must be all knowing!!Originally posted by PGant
Unsubstantiated claims and idle speculation amounts to little more than lazy reporting or tripe-like filler to satisfy an editor requested word-count for a column.
Sorry, but this guy has zero credibility in my books. When I see his columns, in don't even stop to read the headline before I turn the page.
Originally posted by arn
I think people take the page1/page2 distinction a bit too literally.
It's a pretty loose split...
I agree the author's credibility in this particular article is pretty poor... and that's reflected in the MacRumors story which states that this may simply be speculation. That being said, I do believe, based on the previously referenced old rumors that Apple very likely does have a tablet project in the works.... whether it will ever be released or not is debatable.
arn