Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
You Know I don't think you're that far off from reality. I was not able to see the video but I can guess what it shows.

I was thinking at first maybe a Touch screen laptop that can fold over and be an ipad. But it's been done already...kinda.

I can imagine some clean metalic slate that lights up to reveal board keys or some other hand/finger gesture required lighted graphic interface.
I guess just taking the touch pad/magic mouse interface to the next level.
Could happen...

Actually, I was trying to be funny. It's the Onion story about the MacBook Wheel.
 
I couldn't help but continously re read the sentence , are you sure it is Apple don't, I disagree and think its Apple doesn't. Doesn't fits with third person subjects and Apple should be in third person.

Does anyone else see this mistake or am I delirious?

"Apple don't" => using 'Apple' to mean a collective (group of employees)
"Apple doesn't" => using 'Apple' to mean the singular company

I think both can be right...
 
Think BIG!

or perhaps... small
squidget_cover.jpg


Personally, I'm hoping Apple buys the AIBO rights from Sony and invents an iPhone you can never misplace, as it will follow you around.
0,1425,i=94113,00.jpg
 
A mouse is actually a proven and reliable technology as are tablets for drawing etc. iOS is a barley passable sketchy hunk of crap technology that people gobble up because it's "neat".

The consumers simple mindedness is heavily swayed by anything pretty or that makes them think "oh lookie! I can control it with my finger" which in generally followed by a goofy laugh.

Have you actually used an iPad over a course of weeks or months, as opposed to just playing with it briefly and dismissing it? I've been using various types of computers since 1983, I have an engineering degree, and I spent 20 years in the high-tech industry, so I hardly consider myself a simple-minded consumer. (I'll have to ask my friends and family whether my laugh is goofy.) I was skeptical about about the iPad being anything more than a novelty, so I held off buying one, but I finally broke down this past April after hearing so many people I trust rave about it. I'm now a convert. iOS doesn't render OS X, the mouse, or the graphic tablet obsolete. There are still tasks I can only do or that are easier to do on my Mac. But there are a surprising number of tasks that are easier to do using my iPad. iOS is still a relatively young operating system, and I'd be perfectly happy if iOS and OS X eventually merge -- as long as different types of users, from consumers to pros, can do what they need to do. I imagine it being context-sensitive, where you would use the touch interface for iDevices, and a conventional keyboard/mouse/trackpad/graphics tablet for Mac devices.

I certainly don't see that happening in time for this rumor, of course. There's one possibility that nobody has mentioned yet: that the rumor is incorrect, and there won't be any startingly different addition to the Mac product line. My own wish would be for a mid-priced tower (like the beloved G4 Sawtooth that I used for eight years, upgrading every part that could be upgraded), but I don't think that's ever going to happen. If there is something new, my money is on some sort of Mac TV, as that's been a persistent rumor for quite some time.
 
Next Windows PCs surge past the form Apple Mac

Rumors this thin make me miss Page 2. But if they are going to introduce a new mac product I agree with the poster above who says "all touchscreen" mac. Launchpad will be the home screen.

But then Windows will flounder as they have nothing to copy. Then we will be in the post PC time period. No Macs, no PCs, only iToys & those that have learned to copy & add some useful features.
 
You might be right, especially about a younger demographic. But my Mom had her last TV for nearly 20 years. She has a nice big Samsung HD one now. I can't see her replacing it until it fails. And these TVs should last 10 years. But my point is still valid if you think these TVs only have 5 year lifespan for the initial buyer. That is still way longer than iPhones, iPads or iPods. Once you have a HD TV that is good quality and as big as you want, there really isn't much incentive to replace it. In fact, I don't think I know anyone who has bought a large top of the line LCD HD TV who has since gone on and replaced it. Granted I think my friends started buying those only about five years ago. But they don't seem to be in any hurry to replace them. And some of those buddies have plenty of money for gadgets (they get new iPhone every year, for example).

The fact is that you can get iOS on your TV for $100 and that product doesn't sell in high volume. Apple could make Apple TV better but I don't think sticking the little black box into the TV is really going to allow them to charge the type of premium and margins that Apple likes to get.

It depends on the use. A person who has a TV only for watching the news and reality shows will probably never buy an iTV. But someone who wants the best in home cinema, video gaming, and Internet use, normally change it more often. My previous 37” TV lasted only 4 years and I do not see my current 1year old 50” TV to stay in my living room for more than additional 4 more years. When we talk about iTV we mean for something entirely new with new capabilities, not just an AppleTV inside the screen.
 
17" semi-portable desktop tablet running Lion. Lies flat on desk, or lies nearly flat. Transmits to thunderbolt desktop monitor which mirrors its display, or connects via a hot-rod new airport wirelessly. Desktop display can connect external drive or additional display. Can be used as input device (combined keyboard and multitouch trackpad) or as interactive touch surface stand alone touch iMac. Full size on screen keyboard with number pad. $1200.00 with 128gb ssd and 4gb ram. $600 27" display as option. Will be called iMac touch.

Shrug. One of our guesses will be right, why not mine?
 
I agree with you. I've always thought actual "PCs" were much more interesting than this consumer stuff that seems to be becoming very mainstream.

What I like about PCs is that they scale up and for a pretty small price (even for high end machines like the Mac Pro) you put the tools into someones hand to produce images, videos, code, and well, whatever at a professional ("Hollywood") level. You have the capability to do whatever you want.

As long as the capability is there, I really don't care what form factor it takes, particularly if it makes my tasks easier. But what makes me nervous is that Apple seems to be stripping capability in order to appeal to a broader audience, at least based on the minimal evidence that the FCPx incident provided.

I don't care about what is good for Apple. I simply want a sophisticated tools that allows me to do what I do (large scale prints derived from numerous large raw files, videos utilizing processor taxing compositing and filters, coding capable of creating tens of thousands of files that will eventually become moving images, Photorealistic 3d generation of photographs and videos...)

What PCs give people that consumer devices have not reached yet is a tool that allows for some amazing, fully realized (at a professional level) creative activity. Ipads and their ilk seem to encourage passive consumption (I am not saying they are only capable of this, but looking at the top selling iPad apps indicates a "Here we are now, entertain us" mentality.

What makes me nervous is Apple shifting their focus completely to those who consume and ignoring those who produce. If I could make a feature length film using the iPad, or even manage and edit photographs capable of being printed large, then I might not care that the shift is starting now...
 
Plus Apple has no history as a TV manufacturer so I would assume they would re-badge one from another company, re-style it a little bit and stick an Apple TV into it. Last you know darn well you would be paying a premium for that Apple logo on it. In the end it would not sell well and people would rather have a TV that could be used as a normal monitor with a tuner and just hook up components to it.

People used to say the same for Apple in the phone industry before the iPhone.
 
Am I the only person who cannot see the point to a "mid range upgradable tower"? Pro's need all the horsepower of the current Mac Pro, I don't think that's going anywhere, and the Mac Mini is plenty powerful enough for most other people.

I'm going rack mountable Mac Pro.
 
Oh god (iSteve) PLEASE let it be a system between a macmini and iMac, something like an iMac without the monitor.

I always wanted something stronger than mini, but without the monitor of iMac (because I work in printing and I want to replace it with a better monitor anyway). And no word for the macpro, too much power and too expensive for me right now.
It doesn't have to be ultra small, this will save us from the extra cost of the engineering to make it small.

Cheaped out on engineering, a form factor that nobody wants... does that sound like an Apple product to you?

You work in printing and you can't afford a Mac Pro? Sounds a bit hard to believe.
 
People used to say the same for Apple in the phone industry before the iPhone.

I think it is hard to make a comparison between a very well established TV market and the smartphone market which was still in its infancy for mainstream customers when Apple entered the market. I believe customers are much less likely to dump out their new large screen HDTV and replace it with a model from Apple then switch to a new phone on a two year contract.

The Apple TV still isn't that popular and its only $99 now. So you are saying that building it into a TV and then charging for that Apple logo is going to make people go nuts over it? I doubt it.
 
I doubt any of us can predict what this could be, given that the news says "entirely different". None of us could have seen the iPhone coming, and none of us could have seen the iPad coming.

Though, if we follow this line iPhone>iPad>..., maybe it'll be an.. iMat? Giant iPad :D
 
Wait ! I think I know what it is! Steve told me!

It's called Big Mac. We were chatting over at MacDonald when he mention perhaps a little more ketchup would be better. Perhaps finally Apple decided F&B is just as relevant as the branding itself. :p
 
I think it is hard to make a comparison between a very well established TV market and the smartphone market which was still in its infancy for mainstream customers when Apple entered the market. I believe customers are much less likely to dump out their new large screen HDTV and replace it with a model from Apple then switch to a new phone on a two year contract.

The Apple TV still isn't that popular and its only $99 now. So you are saying that building it into a TV and then charging for that Apple logo is going to make people go nuts over it? I doubt it.

No I am not saying that. If you noticed my previous posts I say that the potential iTV has nothing to do with Apple TV.
 
...My guess would be some sort of appliance-type device. Perhaps a headless home media server?
That was my guess too. This could be the Airport Extreme/Time Capsule makeover that was rumored a few months ago. Apple needs a relatively inexpensive, completely standalone file and media/iTunes server that can be accessed by iOS devices like the Apple TV and iPad. Then allow it to seamlessly and automatically sync with your iCloud and a lot of home users could make do with just this and a MacBook Air and/or iOS device.

The Mac mini is kind of overkill for such functionality and even at $600 it's just too expensive. I'm thinking of a $200 to $300 device that could provide WiFi service, nearly unlimited central storage (via USB-attached external drives with RAID support), and super easy integration to the iCloud.

Unfortunately, I suspect that Apple will want to bundle their own hard drive (internal) to any such device which could break my price point and turn this into just the next iteration on the Time Capsule. The latter wouldn't be too bad if it offered all of the features I've outlined, but I'd much prefer that they just target external storage and forget about offering their own internal hard drive.
 
Anxious to see what will it be!

The rumored xMac would be a nice commitment to real computers and folks like myself, who bought into Apple for being relevant in education, Unix features and professional multimedia creation. In Europe, the base MP is 3500 USD now. Apple shifted price ranges, so this base price only contains a single socket system. For me this is too much, I can't stomach the fact that a 1500 USD PC runs circels around it and is built from quality components. My 2008 MP was one of the best deals ever, but given the current pricing the xMac would be the best upgrade path for me. Sadly the iMac's HDD access is horrendous (lcd panel removal), and you are stuck with the GPU. All this could have been remedied already by having rear access to mxm GPU modules and HDD expansion. But gee, the back of the iMac wouldn't be this flawlessly beautiful.:rolleyes:

However I'm all for the iPhone and the mobile lineup. Apple really feels it. The only problem with mobile only focus that I'll have to shift my professional workflow to Windows, where the tools are available. The best strategy is to wait what this new Mac will be. Right now I'm pissed of with Lion: disappeared folders, Spotlight not indexing folders properly, Apple just killed the logic of exposé, more UI limitations... Let's wait and see, but my bet is on a 15" ultra thin MBP.
 
Oh God! Let's hope this is not the touch screen iOS/ MAC OS hybrid!! Unless it's damn frigging good?

What about: Macs without any disk, but streaming everything from the Cloud?

Maybe it's finally a real iPad that's a tablet that runs OSX and has a usb port.

a mish mash of all this considering icloud is also launching this fall. Since Lion has had it's moment for launch the hardware line would revolve around ios5 (hopefully iOS5 pro)
remember this date ties in with cloud...
http://www.apple.com/uk/icloud/?cid=mc-uk-g-clb-icloud&sissr=1

a 3-d inbuilt camera and touch screen display would also be good! PIPEDREAM!
 
"Apple don't" => using 'Apple' to mean a collective (group of employees)
"Apple doesn't" => using 'Apple' to mean the singular company

I think both can be right...

I think you should say:

Apple doesn't use, or Apple don't use.

I think both work, but I reckon 'doesn't' sounds better.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.