I wish it's an A6 powered MacBook Air
This Story seems irrelevant without a time frame.
Anyone can say that Apple is going to introduce a new Mac Line in the Future.
This to me is only news if they plan on doing it soon.
A Mac mini tower is a must. Quiet. Quad core. Something between the Mac mini and the Mac Pro. Because the iMac is a waste of display after three years or so! The mythical midrange Mac minitower at
http://www.macworld.com/article/58562/2007/06/midrangemac.html
Touchscreen Macs running OS 11.
In 2-3 years.
Why would you wish to live through all the headaches of an architecture yet again ? Especially to an architecture known for its low power/performance ?![]()
HawkEye40 said:Am I the only person who cannot see the point to a "mid range upgradable tower"? Pro's need all the horsepower of the current Mac Pro, I don't think that's going anywhere, and the Mac Mini is plenty powerful enough for most other people.
I'm going rack mountable Mac Pro.
How much would that reduced speed affect usefulness despite possibly imposing a performance deficit?
For any Mac with Intel graphics, it would be a benefit.
Or, once the non-replacable dedicated graphics is old enough that a docked GPU would perform better, then it would be a benefit.
... According to a rough translation provided with the original Japanese version, the product is said to be "absolutely different from current products" and potentially set for introduction by the end of the year. ...
The iMacbook Air Pro Touch!
Am I the only person who cannot see the point to a "mid range upgradable tower"? Pro's need all the horsepower of the current Mac Pro, I don't think that's going anywhere, and the Mac Mini is plenty powerful enough for most other people.
I think it's a SMF tower also. Mid level professionals need an upgradable Mac.
- Mac Mini not good enough for mid level users
- iMac not upgradable and monitor attached. Most mid level users have their own monitor or display. Most want the ability to upgrade the video card.
-Mac Pro too high end for most mid level users. Don't need 2 opt slots, 4 raid slots, 8 mem slots, etc. Too much bang for mid level users.
SMF tower could have Quad cores (same iMac specs) with Thunderbolt with.
1 Opt Drive slot (if that)
1-2 HD slots
4 Mem Slots
3-4 PCIE slots
Just my thoughts. It's the model they are missing..and could really get gamers into the 'game'..literally.
I do too, but Steve directs the company and if he declares Post PC era then that is where they are going even if us customers are kicking and screaming all the way to wherever Apple takes us next.
However, these thunderbolt GPU CAN'T feed the power back to a laptop's screen in conjunction with the intergrated graphics card. You can only connect to an external monitor, meaning you wouldn't get the power of your intergrated card + the external thunderbolt card. So the cost for the external thunderbolt GPU isn't really worth it. It may support 1920x1080 apple resolution for normal activity, but I don't expect it to be able to handle any type of rendering for 1080p such as games (even if they are older) I'm not even talking about demanding ones like crysis...
Just because I dream of a MBA with 24h battery lifeand since the only think I do on a laptop is LaTeX / browsing / reading article I don't need powerful CPU and I'm sure I'm not the only one .
Here's my silly will-a** guess:
A6-based 13" MacBook with an extra-big touchpad. No touchscreen or optical drive.
Aluminum, thinner than 13" MacBook Pro, but not as thin as MacBook Air.
$799 because Apple doesn't need to pay off-the-shelf prices for Intel CPUs.