Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I'm guessing for us n Australia Vision Pro with be $6-7000 dollars and after the rave reviews, I'll pass.

Thanks anyway Timmy, but if you haven't had a look around at the world right now, things aren't in a good way especially in terms of petrol and grocery prices, not that you'd know how much a litre of milk costs.

Also, thanks for putting the iPad Pro prices up in Australia, Apple truly are the only company that can get away with putting prices up in the current financial climate.

So altruistic of you and way to go bridging that gap that just keeps getting wider between the rich and the poor🙄.
I’m from Australia as well but the price increase is $300AUD which is around $200USD.

The base model 11” iPad Pro was $1399AUD with 128GB and the new one is $1699AUD with 256GB.

I agree these are expensive but yeah it’s not outlandish and in line with the US prices. I won’t be getting till Apple improves the OS. The M4 is wasted in the iPad right now.
 
Im guesing 4000 €

Probably, if the price is similar to the U.S. price. Based on the current exchange rate, $3,499 USD (pre-sales tax starting price of Vision Pro) is about 3,212. The VAT can be the variable. If, for example, a country has a 25% VAT that would bring the price to 4,015.
 
Not interested. 1st gen product and would still be way too expensive if it they halved the price.

I'd like to try it but it'd have to be <£1,000 for me to even consider it. I'd rather buy a Meta Quest whatever it's called.
 
Oh joy $3500 US is only $5,000 in Canadian…

With our country's economy in the toilet, I'm sure they'll be lined up in downtown Toronto for this… *cough*
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yvan256
£3500 for Vision Pro £499 for AppleCare+, not an accessible device to simply walk in to a store and check out like all other devices (i understand why.. headset etc), out of reach for majority of apple users by price alone. Wonder what stores foot traffic will look like after a few weeks for store demos etc. Bad enough recently walking instore to find a staff member to ask a question without an appointment.
I expect it will be more than that though unless its a business purchase - don't forget to add VAT on top of the usual higher prices we get in Europe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lenningj
iPad Pro is more expensive everywhere because it includes incredible new display technologies. Apple has worked to keep prices as low as possible by trimming back some features that only a small number of people used. Apple doesn't price gouge and always wants to get their products into the hands of as many people as possible.
Then why does iPad Air still gets a 60hz display? Promotion is 2017 technology. I agree that iPad Pro did got rid of some useless things such as a ultra wide lens, but they still seek profit somehow
 
Or is it because you have zero vision of the future?
No monitors...infinite screen space.
3D interactive apps not constrained by a box.

beyond that normal glasses size AR.

Oddly one of the most compelling examples is Lego Bricktales.

It still won’t be successful for a number of reasons
 
Then why does iPad Air still gets a 60hz display? Promotion is 2017 technology. I agree that iPad Pro did got rid of some useless things such as a ultra wide lens, but they still seek profit somehow

Apple's incredible ProMotion display technology is really expensive. It doesn't make sense to put this into a budget-friendly device at the cost of other things iPad Air users love. Most people can't tell the difference, although we techies can easily see it.

Getting the price down to a truly remarkable $599 requires some compromises. One of the chunkiest items when taking things iPads Pros to the iPads Airs is the display cost. So going with a gorgeous 60hz panel is an amazing place to start given what I wrote in the previous paragraph.

Yes, you are right - Apple seeks to make profit.
 
Or is it because you have zero vision of the future?
No monitors...infinite screen space.
3D interactive apps not constrained by a box.

beyond that normal glasses size AR.

Oddly one of the most compelling examples is Lego Bricktales.


And a sky's-the-limt AR applications for a wide variety of commercial/industrial/medical/educational/architectural/etc. applications.

And loads of consumer possibilities. I'm looking forward to exploring the caves in Lascaux, France to walk among the cave paintings dating back 15,000 years. And maybe running a San Francisco Marathon with 25,000 other runners.

It takes just a wee bit of imagination.
 
Apple's incredible ProMotion display technology is really expensive. It doesn't make sense to put this into a budget-friendly device at the cost of other things iPad Air users love. Most people can't tell the difference, although we techies can easily see it.

Getting the price down to a truly remarkable $599 requires some compromises. One of the chunkiest items when taking things iPads Pros to the iPads Airs is the display cost. So going with a gorgeous 60hz panel is an amazing place to start given what I wrote in the previous paragraph.

Yes, you are right - Apple seeks to make profit.
Remarkable, Gorgeous, Incredible - I detect an adjective overload straight from the Apple book of approved words !
 
Not sure if the hype train ever even arrived to the station to begin with. There was never a killer app previewed for it.
To be fair the Mac launched without a killer app. It was the combination of PageMaker and the LaserWriter more than a year after the Mac's launch where the use case for it became clear and Apple and the Mac cemented their place as the go-to computer for desktop publishing and graphic design/creative arts in general.

And for the record the original Macintosh at launch would have cost $7300 in today's dollars.
 
To be fair the Mac launched without a killer app. It was the combination of PageMaker and the LaserWriter more than a year after the Mac's launch where the use case for it became clear and Apple and the Mac cemented their place as the go-to computer for desktop publishing and graphic design/creative arts in general.

And for the record the original Macintosh at launch would have cost $7300 in today's dollars.
The original Mac was a failure.

There’s just no way around it. The problem is not the potential of AR, but that tech for mass adoption of AR simply does not exist.
Even if the VPro was a third of the price, it still would lack a mass reason to buy.
 
To be fair the Mac launched without a killer app. It was the combination of PageMaker and the LaserWriter more than a year after the Mac's launch where the use case for it became clear and Apple and the Mac cemented their place as the go-to computer for desktop publishing and graphic design/creative arts in general.

And for the record the original Macintosh at launch would have cost $7300 in today's dollars.
MacPaint (!), MacWrite, and MacDraw were revolutionary, incredibly compelling apps, being offered by Apple.
Add to this the ability to copy & paste from one app to another, to have a wide range of fonts, and then have it all printed out (in yes, a dot-matrix at first) exactly how you saw it on the screen, made the Mac incredibly compelling.

It is true that Aldus Pagemaker and the LaserWriter brought this all together in a way that made an exact, business-quality solution targeting specific professions, where people could justify the cost to their bosses. But right off the bat, the potential was blindingly obvious.
 
MacPaint (!), MacWrite, and MacDraw were revolutionary, incredibly compelling apps, being offered by Apple.
Add to this the ability to copy & paste from one app to another, to have a wide range of fonts, and then have it all printed out (in yes, a dot-matrix at first) exactly how you saw it on the screen, made the Mac incredibly compelling.

It is true that Aldus Pagemaker and the LaserWriter brought this all together in a way that made an exact, business-quality solution targeting specific professions, where people could justify the cost to their bosses. But right off the bat, the potential was blindingly obvious.

Again, the “potential” of AR is blindingly obvious, that’s not the point. Also the “potential” of teleportation is blindingly obvious.
But we’re many years far from having the tech that is needed to realize that potential.
 
The comments here regarding AVP pretty much dovetail with comments back when iPod/iPhone/Watch were released.

Not surprised at all; rather, expected.

That’s odd, I don’t remember the comments about the iPod/iPhone/Apple Watch being this brutal whatsoever.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jlnr
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.