xraydoc said:Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.0.1; en-us; Droid Build/ESD56) AppleWebKit/530.17 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/530.17)
I was half beliving Apple would drop the Mac Pro and their desktop display line other than the laptop-centric 24".
June? Really? They've devoted so much to the soemwhat overhyped iPad that they've lost sight of everything else!
Looks like Apple cares more for iPod users than for the Pro users that kept them afloat during the lean years.
Remember, Apple - trust is hard to earn and easy to lose.
Not sure if its mentioned, however does this really make any logical sense. Lets look at some of the facts:
1) 21" iMac will allow the monitor to accept an external video source.
2) 24" ACD LED IPS is not a true 16x9 ratio, though display only.
3) 27" iMac will allow the monitor to accept an external video source.
would the next display option not be a...
4) 30" ACD LED IPS is not a true 16x9 ratio, though display only.
Why wouldrelease and carry 2x27" display/AIO option when it would clearly be advantageous to buy the 27" iMac and use the display with an external video source when need be. It makes more sense to release a 30" to match the present offering or exceeding the specs. Take this for simple math for thought:
21+3 = 24
24+3 = 27
27+3 = 30
My hunch is that this rumour should state 30" vice 27" LED ACD IPS displays.
It already does. My friend got his for 800. Just call them...
I don't see any mention of the U2711 being LED backlit. Am I missing something?
I'm disinclined to see Apple offering a new 30" ACD, mainly because nothing was stopping them from making the iMac a 30" display as opposed to a 27" other than the higher cost of the 30" panel.
So that Apple did not choose a 30" panel for the iMac, which would have given them an excuse to launch a new 30" ACD, makes me inclined to believe the 30" ACD will be End-of-Lifed in favor of this rumored 27" display.
And with Apple phasing out the 20" and 23" ACDs in favor of the 24" model, it would not be unreasonable for them to phase out the 30" in favor of a 27" model.
no, but what exact advantage do you perceive from a white led backlit screen, other than it being one of the latest buzzwords?
Exactly. Add to that the 6+ year time span since the release of the 30" ACD + pent up customers that have been waiting for the update, and I'd say your pricing guesses sound practical in this case.
Except if this were true everybody who isn't a moron would just buy a 27" iMac for the exact same price since it can be used as an external display, and they'd get a pretty nice computer for "free". So no way the 27" ACD costs this much.
Yes, you're right. I forgot to factor in the base 27" iMac (even when I just mentioned it in a previous post).
Since Apple's already set the bar then, perhaps a $1299 starting price might be the safest bet?
Also I hope in a new Mac Pro's case... Not only performance, but design!![]()
I like the design. Easy hard drive install/remove trays, RAM slots that can be easily accessed, two optical bays & very quite operation. Sure it's big but it is a workstation.
The one i would like would be a dust screen for the air flow. I'm tired of almost once a month of cleaning the dust out of this 2008 Mac Pro. Yes, I do have a clean work area but I get a ton of fine dust for the chiller system here at work.
Hey guys check out this link my friend just sent me. WARNING: THIS IS FAKE ITS NOT REAL AND I'M NOT TROLLING. THIS IS FOR YOU MACBOOKPRO PEOPLE OUT THERE:
http://img35.imageshack.us/img35/1271/macbook3dfinalsmall.jpg
and maybe apple will put it in these new 27 inch displays.
This is the hostile attitude I really disagree with. The processors just debuted earlier this week. I just think it is amazing that people think Apple can pull these processors out of thin air. Saddly it is an attitude seen far to much on this forum. The Mac Pros will come when Apple has all of it's ducks in a row. The processor is just one of those ducks.
Dave
The Mac Pro was last updated over a year ago (March 3, 2009). So the rumor pegs an update after 15 months? Apple is still charging premium prices for year old hardware, that's crazy.![]()
The 27-inch LED Cinema Display is said to use the same panel as that used in Apple's 27-inch iMac and will closely resemble the existing 24-inch LED Cinema Display released in October 2008.
I hadn't read about lightpeak until earlier in this post. As I understand it, is it a replacement for SATA connections? It claims to have a faster transfer rate for optical drives, etc. If lightpeak (a SONY invention?) is going to be implemented in a new Apple system, if would be across product lines and when it has been utilized as a standard. I doubt the next Mac Pro will use it.
Also, could it be added through a PCI-Express card?
Doesn't make sense.
Would be surprised if Apple makes enough on a 27" derivative to make it worth while ( must have 29-35 % margins ). A 30" version would be doom. (e.g, the completely non value price competitive pricing on the current 30" ... it is just in the store because it already existed and the R&D is already paid for. )
You OBVIOUSLY have NO idea what you are talking about!
Read: http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/26/exclusive-apple-dictated-light-peak-creation-to-intel-could-be/