Oh yes. Absolutely. Why should Apple listen to its customers? Especially its high-end high-ticket enterprise line customers?
Yeah, those guys aren't buying Apple displays, especially the 30" ones.
I have both a 30" aPPle display & a 30 HP display. The HP display is brighter& gives a much less washed out picture.
I assume you're talking about the LP2480, which is indeed a beautiful display. It's also quite a bit newer, LED backlight, and
hugely thick, not to mention $200-400 more expensive than the Apple 30" display.
A 16 X 10 screen in the computer field is a better compromise than a 16 X 9 screen more commonly found in the entertainment field.
I'm not sure that's the case, but more to the point, panel manufacturers are standardizing their large-format production on 16x9 for cost reasons.
I don't understand why would Apple kill the 30 inch and downgrade to a lower size?
Because the 30" panel is old and it's time for Apple to move on. There are no 30"/larger panels on the market now for Apple to use except for the one in the HP and the NEC, which are also a few years old now. It wouldn't be suitable to launch a new product with a panel from 2008.
Given the volume price of getting 27" panels, it's much more likely that Apple will drop the price of the 24" and bring the 27" in until something bigger comes down the pipe. LG seems to have worked out the problems with the brand new panel for the iMacs.
27 inch is definitely out of the question. it's probably going to be about 1500 bucks or so. too much for just a computer monitor. I can get a bigger tv for less money. apple is getting ridiculous now.
It
can't be more than $1199, and even that is high. You can always get a bigger TV for less money than an equivalent computer monitor in this range--even low-end 30" monitors are twice the price of 32" 1080p televisions. High pixel density is expensive.