Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
65,245
33,524


2024 is shaping up to be a busy year for Apple with a large number of important new releases due across the company's product lines, but there are some noticeable absences from its rumored plans.

Apple-Logo-16x9.jpg

Using information from various analysts and reliable sources, here's everything we're no longer expecting Apple to release this year.

iPhone SE 4

While Apple was previously rumored to be planning the launch of the fourth-generation iPhone SE for 2024, the company is now widely expected to release the device in 2025.

iphone-se-4-modified-flag-edges.jpg

The current iPhone SE launched in March 2022, meaning that it will be at least 33 months old by the time its successor arrives. The next-generation iPhone SE is expected to feature a design based on the iPhone 14, an OLED display, a larger battery, an Action Button, USB-C port, Face ID, and potentially Apple's first custom 5G cellular modem.

AirTag 2

Production of the second-generation AirTag tracker was apparently due to kick off in the fourth quarter of 2024, but the latest forecast from Apple analyst Ming-Chi Kuo claims that the accessory will not reach mass production and be released until 2025.

AirTag-2-Mock-Feature.jpg

According to Kuo, the second-generation AirTag will be part of a new spatial computing ecosystem that Apple is building, with the Vision Pro serving as the core to integrate other devices. A new AirTag would likely incorporate Apple's second-generation Ultra Wideband chip that debuted in the iPhone 15 models, allowing for even more precise tracking at longer distances.

MicroLED Apple Watch Ultra

The first Apple device to offer a microLED display will apparently be an upcoming Apple Watch Ultra model released in late 2025 or 2026. In fact, Apple may not update the Apple Watch Ultra in 2024 and hold off for the significant display upgrade the following year.

Apple-Watch-Ultra-Black-Feature.jpg

Apple's plan to bring a microLED display to the Apple Watch Ultra is very widely corroborated, starting with a report from display analyst Ross Young in January 2023. The microLED display is expected to be 2.12-inches in size, a 10% increase over the display of the current Apple Watch Ultra.

The advanced display technology offers improved brightness, color reproduction, dynamic range, viewing angles, and efficiency, making images look more like they are "painted" atop the display glass. The project is part of Apple's plan to reduce its reliance on Samsung as a supplier while yielding benefits from engineering its own displays in-house, just like its chip technology.

While initial reports distinctively placed the launch of the microLED Apple Watch Ultra in 2024, the latest reports point to late 2025 or potentially even 2026.

iMac Pro

Apple is still rumored to be working on a high-end "iMac Pro" model with a 32-inch mini-LED display and a larger selection of ports.

iMac-Pro-2022-27-and-24-iMac.jpg

Despite the discontinuation of the iMac Pro and any iMac models larger than 24-inches in 2021, Apple is still said to have plans to launch a substantially bigger and more powerful iMac model.

While Bloomberg's Mark Gurman floated the possibility of the machine launching in late 2024, 2025 may be a more likely time frame. Ming-Chi Kuo has similarly said that the new iMac Pro will launch in 2025, so the 24-inch iMac may well continue to be the only Apple all-in-one desktop available this year.

Foldable iPhone and iPad

Apple has been known to be working on foldable display technology for many years, filing multiple patents related to the technology, but a foldable iPhone or iPad still seems to be quite some time away.

Foldable-iPhone-2023-Feature-Blue.jpg

Rumors in September 2020 indicated that Samsung was providing foldable display samples to Apple for a future foldable ‌iPhone‌, but there had been no strong indication that Apple was planning to use Samsung's technology until recently.

In 2021, Bloomberg claimed that Apple had started "early work" on an ‌iPhone‌ with a foldable display, but that it had not committed to releasing a foldable device at that time. Development in 2021 had not expanded beyond a di... Click here to read rest of article

Article Link: Apple Products We're NOT Expecting to Launch in 2024
 

harriska2

macrumors 68000
Mar 16, 2011
1,939
1,067
Oregon
I like the 5.1 inch mini. Works for me. That said, I prefer no phone, just a watch that can stand alone without the requirement of a phone. 🤷🏻‍♀️
 

azentropy

macrumors 601
Jul 19, 2002
4,110
5,619
Surprise
The simple fact is that far more millions prefer larger screens than small.Poor sales of the 12 & 13 mini proved that.
Except it isn't that simple. They didn't necessarily want the 12 or 13 mini because of the screen size. They didn't want it because they prioritized battery life and/or pro features like Promotion or Camera's more and frankly the mini's were not a great value unless you specifically wanted the smaller screen. I would gladly pay even more for a smaller screen option, but I know I'm in the minority.

As your number one priority:
  • If you wanted the best battery life - you don't get a mini
  • If you want the best screen/refresh - you don't get a mini
  • If you want the best camera's - you don't get a mini
  • If you want the best materials - you don't get a mini
  • If you want the best most affordable - you don't get a mini
 

bradman83

macrumors 65816
Oct 29, 2020
1,244
3,125
Buffalo, NY
Likely $2000-3000 but the price doesn't matter. Apple products don't need to be affordable.
If it’s 32” then Apple would need a 6k panel for true Retina resolution. Those are still fairly niche and pricy (Dell’s model starts at $2600 which is a discount from the original $3200 MSRP). Obviously Apple could source these OEM panels for at least half that, but that’s still a huge chunk of component costs to be eaten up by just the display. $4000 seems like a realistic MSRP minimum for a 32” 6K iMac.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dante_mr

McWetty

macrumors 6502
Oct 7, 2011
309
1,472
Except it isn't that simple. They didn't necessarily want the 12 or 13 mini because of the screen size. They didn't want it because they prioritized battery life and/or pro features like Promotion or Camera's more and frankly the mini's were not a great value unless you specifically wanted the smaller screen. I would gladly pay even more for a smaller screen option, but I know I'm in the minority.

As your number one priority:
  • If you wanted the best battery life - you don't get a mini
  • If you want the best screen/refresh - you don't get a mini
  • If you want the best camera's - you don't get a mini
  • If you want the best materials - you don't get a mini
  • If you want the best most affordable - you don't get a mini
You said it way better than I could. Nailed it.
 

iSandrotto

macrumors newbie
Oct 28, 2023
28
70
It's been a while since we heard a rumor of the next Mac display (XDR Pro II or Studio Display II). What is taking them so long?

Especially the XDR Pro II is getting long in the tooth....Thunderbolt 3, etc. Would be great to get an update soon (Thunderbolt 5 support for 120Hz 6k?)
 
  • Like
Reactions: haddy and Alex Cai
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.