I suspect likely this summer. An M3 Max Mac Studio will be a killer machine.I'm just impatiently waiting for the M3-based Mac Studio. Definitely will be coming in 2024, but hoping sooner than later.
I suspect likely this summer. An M3 Max Mac Studio will be a killer machine.I'm just impatiently waiting for the M3-based Mac Studio. Definitely will be coming in 2024, but hoping sooner than later.
Which is true but timing is everything. They released the SE 6 months before the Mini and many thought the SE was the Mini, if I'm remembering correctly. The Mini is never going to be a huge seller but there is a market for it. The SE and Mini should be combined into 1 product.The simple fact is that far more millions prefer larger screens than small.Poor sales of the 12 & 13 mini proved that.
This is me. I prefer the larger phones mostly because of the battery life gained with itIt’s something people say they want, but then they actually don’t. Battery life on the 12 Mini was also pretty poor, which didn’t help, even if the 13 was supposed to be better in that regard.
I just want a standard iMac with a larger than 24” display and more ports. Don’t need pro power.
You got a point. An iMac Pro doesn’t make much sense. If you need a pro, you need the top of the line in performance, so why tie it to a screen? That screen can last many more years than the computer itself. Apple released the Studio and Mac Pro for this exact audience.Everyone in MR: “Give us an iMac Pro!”
Apple: “Here you go, minimum specs start at $6000. Place your orders now.”
Everyone in MR: slowly backing away.
Seems fair considering the mini´s age; my battery cap. (health) reads 88%.Battery capacity shows 86%.
well yeah, it is something people want. They just don't want all the compromises that Apple keeps bundling in with smaller screens. Someone over there is equating: People want a smaller iPhone/ipad = a smaller screen is less expensive = what people really want is a less expensive iPhone/iPad = lets make try to sell them a cheaped out feature-lite small model. Then when no one buys it, "oh so people don't want a smaller screen after all." No, we want a phone/iPad like the extremely popular iPad mini 4, which was the exact same hardware in the full-sized iPad at the time, but in a lighter, more portable size. When they do that, they sell.It’s something people say they want, but then they actually don’t. Battery life on the 12 Mini was also pretty poor, which didn’t help, even if the 13 was supposed to be better in that regard.
well yeah, it is something people want. They just don't want all the compromises that Apple keeps bundling in with smaller screens. Someone over there is equating: People want a smaller iPhone/ipad = a smaller screen is less expensive = what people really want is a less expensive iPhone/iPad = lets make try to sell them a cheaped out feature-lite small model. Then when no one buys it, "oh so people don't want a smaller screen after all." No, we want a phone/iPad like the extremely popular iPad mini 4, which was the exact same hardware in the full-sized iPad at the time, but in a lighter, more portable size. When they do that, they sell.
Not quite, a few problems with using the iPhone PM as an iPad Nano:iPad nano - also known as the iPhone pro max
The simple fact is that far more millions prefer larger screens than small.Poor sales of the 12 & 13 mini proved that.
Maybe MacRumors should just make a script that automatically copy pastes posts and replies between MacRumors and ChatGPT 🤷♂️You
What are the hurdles to bringing a quality foldable smartphone to market, and why hasn’t a $3 trillion company like Apple managed to do it by now?
ChatGPT 3.5
Creating a quality foldable smartphone involves overcoming several technical and design challenges. Some hurdles include:
1. Durability: Foldable screens need to withstand constant bending without losing display quality or durability over time.
2. Material Innovation: Developing flexible and durable materials for the display and hinge mechanism is crucial. Finding materials that can maintain structural integrity through repeated folding is challenging.
3. Engineering Complexity: Designing a hinge system that allows for smooth folding without compromising structural integrity or performance is a complex engineering task.
4. Manufacturing Precision: Achieving the level of precision required for mass production of foldable screens and components adds complexity to the manufacturing process.
5. Battery Technology: Foldable devices need innovative battery solutions that can fit into compact spaces and provide sufficient power for extended use.
6. User Experience: Ensuring a seamless and intuitive user experience across the folding and unfolding states requires careful software development and optimization.
Regarding Apple specifically, while they are a sizable company, the challenges mentioned are significant and may require extensive research and development. Additionally, Apple tends to prioritize delivering polished and well-integrated products, which could contribute to a more cautious approach in adopting new form factors.
It's worth noting that Apple might be working on such technology behind the scenes, and the absence of a foldable iPhone in the market doesn't necessarily mean they haven't explored the concept. Companies often take their time to ensure a product meets their standards before bringing it to market.
Hah. This gave me a good chuckle. Although I don’t think I could handle using one of those massive phones for a year.One trick i used to get over this mini phone. Bought an iPhone 14 Pro Max and forced use it for a year even if I hate to manage that size. After that bought the iPhone 15 pro. It feels like the smallest phone I've ever used. No more missing mini sized iPhones anymore.
Here you go: this is it the iMac 27" with M3, 8 GB RAM and 256 GB SSD storage. Starting price at 2999 $. The display panel in it is absolutely amazing and in specs similar to Studio Display.I just want a standard iMac with a larger than 24” display and more ports. Don’t need pro power.