This is probably the most decent argument I’ve seen for this, but then my question would be: is there a similar 2/3 of our citizens are using iPhones exclusively in any of the other areas that are pushing this legislation?One company having complete control over what can be installed on roughly two thirds of Japanese citizen's smartphones would seem to be a realistic need. When a country does something like that, it's called authoritarian, but if a for-profit company does that suddenly it's justified "because capitalism", even though the net effect is largely the same, trampling the rights of consumers and the ability of legitimate businesses to operate.