Apple, being the Party *beep*ers. 😂Party's Over.
Apple, being the Party *beep*ers. 😂Party's Over.
If you buy a civic type R and modify it to the hilt and now you want to swap to a focus st, should you just be able to take those mods and move them over to the focus ST?If I were to switch to Android, it would force everybody I’m in an iMessage group chat with to change their habits, use a different app, and have an abandoned years-long chat history full of memories left dormant in memoriam of the friend who switched to Android.
It’s not as simple as “you can just use other apps.” If I switched to Android, I would likely need to adapt to my friends’ habits and chat with them in whichever messenger they happen to use. And finding a mutual app to continue each group chat sounds miserable.
It’s so stupid that we’re having this conversation, because for some reason (it’s money), iMessage needs to be the only chat service locked to one company’s devices.
The blue bubble is just the indicator. The actual problem is if you try and send a video or photo from iPhone -> android or vice versa, via the normal messages app. The quality is equivalent to maybe iPhone 3G quality, as an MMS can only contain kilobytes of content at most.why does anyone care about a blue bubble??? I miss why this is an issue...
That’s true. But iPhone users tend to spend more money than android users. Google sure thinks we are valuable.and the US is still smaller than the rest of the world combinedI am American and i say we arent that important in the grand scheme of things.
So you’re telling me there is a well known and easy to use and obtain workaround?The blue bubble is just the indicator. The actual problem is if you try and send a video or photo from iPhone -> android or vice versa, via the normal messages app. The quality is equivalent to maybe iPhone 3G quality, as an MMS can only contain kilobytes of content at most.
So users are forced to use third party messaging apps.
I havent dug into the PoC they posted on gh yet, but sounds like they reversed engineered the general protocol, encryption, and the undocumented API, no exploit needed (which is more impressive honestly given how thoroughly they managed it seems than finding a vuln and exploiting it)Well, it's really upset that guys from Beeper will not receive bounty for uncovered vulnerability.
I mean it also fully implemented imessage’s E2EE, that’s not just cosmeticTime to stop buying garbage apps that do nothing but attempt to fool people into thinking you have an iPhone, and just buy an iPhone! Or just give up live with the shame of green bubbles.
Seems this is criminal in nature. If someone leaves their door open you are not free to walk in. Of course we don’t know yet if that shoe is dropping.I havent dug into the PoC they posted on gh yet, but sounds like they reversed engineered the general protocol, encryption, and the undocumented API, no exploit needed (which is more impressive honestly given how thoroughly they managed it seems than finding a vuln and exploiting it)
…why would it be criminal in nature? they didnt walk in anywhere, they figured out how to interact with a publicly exposed API…Seems this is criminal in nature. If someone leaves their door open you are not free to walk in. Of course we don’t know yet if that shoe is dropping.
That's really really bad comparison.If you buy a civic type R and modify it to the hilt and now you want to swap to a focus st, should you just be able to take those mods and move them over to the focus ST?
There are a number of apps that facilitate cross platform communication. Apple should not be forced by regulation to make imessage “interoperable”. People should acquire the products that suit them best.
This. A lot of people there don't understand this (they are not tech savvy I guess).I havent dug into the PoC they posted on gh yet, but sounds like they reversed engineered the general protocol, encryption, and the undocumented API, no exploit needed (which is more impressive honestly given how thoroughly they managed it seems than finding a vuln and exploiting it)
But its the meat of the matter.That's really really bad comparison.
Elon is going to make $$$ by opening up the Tesla supercharging network with reserving a good portion for Tesla vehicles. It was his call and if the government stepped in and regulated Teslas supercharging network I would have similar comments. (The difference is Tesla as other charging companies did get government $$$) Apple, while it may be nice if they expanded the imessage platform, I am against regulations forcing hem to.iMessage is messaging platform. Infrastructure. So better to compare it to Tesla superchargers for instance. And these are being opened up. Because that just makes sense and everybody profits from it. Same deal with opening-up iMessage.
that’s not ecosystem lock-in, it’s proprietary software on top of their platform the same as any other software service. As an example move from windows to red-hat Linux and see how easy that is.Everyone would profit from it (well except for Apple of course, because of their ecosystem lock-in),
The above is a logical fallacy when starting an assertion with “if”. If apple really cared about privacy they would have a separate sms app a keep imessage “pure”.Android users and Apple users as well. Why? Because of privacy and E2EE.
If Apple really cared about privacy and security, they would open it up rather than closing it and forcing Apple users to send unencrypted and unsafe SMS instead of iMessage to Android users (and vice-versa of course).
RCS is an SMS band-aid it seems to me.And RCS is not solving that - at least not soon. The standard Apple is implementing is not encrypted.
This is just matter of opinion and view. There are many reasons why completely unregulated market is not good and goes against customers and there are many reasons why regulations are bending the market and why it's bad.It was his call and if the government stepped in and regulated Teslas supercharging network I would have similar comments. (The difference is Tesla as other charging companies did get government $$$) Apple, while it may be nice if they expanded the imessage platform, I am against regulations forcing hem to.
I unfortunately own a Galaxy S22. So very recently.When was the last time you used Android (supposing you have used it)
Well, it is part of the Apple's ecosystem lock-in. It is not cross-platform intentionally and everyone knows iMessage is one of the reasons Apple customers are not considering to switch to other platform. So no, comparison to two different operating system is - again - very wrong. Messaging platform is not comparable to RHEL and Windows.that’s not ecosystem lock-in, it’s proprietary software on top of their platform the same as any other software service. As an example move from windows to red-hat Linux and see how easy that is.
Totally true. And you know why they did not do that? Because it would be much more natural and easy for people to use another messaging app that way. If it was separate it would be easy to differentiate between SMS and another messaging platform. There would not be any "green" and "blue" bubbles. There would only be iMessage separate app which is not cross-platform and therefore it would be inferior to other alternative apps like Whatsapp, Telegram or Signal which are cross-platform. But integration to the default SMS app is the major part of Apple's game. With this move many US customers know just one messaging app and it is de facto standard for them. They don't know the technical side behind all of this, they just know "blue good, green bad. Green Android. Android bad.".If apple really cared about privacy they would have a separate sms app a keep imessage “pure”.
I agree with this one as well.RCS is an SMS band-aid it seems to me.
Maybe repeat instead what plenty of other people are saying which is just wanting cross platform utility
Not true. Maybe Android users in US? Definitely not in the EU. Majority of ppl are using Whatsapp or Telegram there.
So they really do not care about message colors in the iPhone's messaging app. And definitely not Android users (because guess what, they don't see those iPhone message app colors).
![]()
Why Apple’s iMessage Is Winning: Teens Dread the Green Text Bubble
The iPhone maker cultivated iMessage as a must-have blue-bubble texting tool for teens. Android users trigger a just-a-little-less-cool green bubble: “Ew, that’s gross.”www.wsj.com
Yeah, it's the US iPhone users who care about green bubbles. The article above is just one of many.
True. I guess it's because Google wants our data, as per usual.That’s true. But iPhone users tend to spend more money than android users. Google sure thinks we are valuable.
Why is that a security problem? iMessage has always only guaranteed E2EE, it’s a messaging protocol not an identity provider backed by verified positive ID….Excuse me, I haven’t read this entire thread, maybe it was discussed after the first page but I don’t see anybody pointing at the elephant in the room: it was possible for anyone without an Apple ID to send iMessage-s to anybody. So much for how secure iMessage is 🤦🏻♂️
Not surprising. I just wish Apple would quash this ridiculous issue by releasing iMessage for Android.
The only people making it a green vs blue thing are Android users lmao.they just know "blue good, green bad. Green Android. Android bad.".