It’s not just the bubbles, as dozen of people have pointed out. It’s the want for cross-platform iMessage.Show me an Apple user in this thread that cares about blue bubble.
It’s not just the bubbles, as dozen of people have pointed out. It’s the want for cross-platform iMessage.Show me an Apple user in this thread that cares about blue bubble.
Aka blue bubbles.It’s the want for cross-platform iMessage
I mean green literally is androids color 😂🤣This is getting ridiculous and pathetic IMO. Paying $2 a month for blue bubbles? Embrace being green.
This is because Whatsapp etc is used as a replacement for SMS, not as a replacement for iMessage. SMS is much more used in US than in Europe. Almost all Whatsapp threads I have were started by an Android user, because they stopped using SMS. If I send a text to an Android user, most of them will reply back using Whatsapp (I think Telegram is an Eastern Europe thing?)
OK, then we’re not discussing the same thing.It’s not just the bubbles, as dozen of people have pointed out. It’s the want for cross-platform iMessage.
No. If I send a text I don’t notice whether it is sent as SMS or iMessage. If an Android user receives an SMS, they now have my phone number, which enables them to send a Whatsapp message back. If they have an iPhone, they will typically just reply with iMessage. I do have a meaningful amount of people insisting on FB Messenger, which annoys the crap out of me.I haven’t actively used WhatsApp in awhile. Can you sms through it.
I don’t communicate much with that demographic, but my perception is you are right.These days in America, for the 15-35 demographic it seems Snapchat is more the go to these days.
I might, when I meet a person who uses it.Get Signal 😅
I mean if you want iMessage get an iPhone... Back in the day, people couldn't have Blackberry Messenger on whatever device they wanted... Same way I can't buy Target branded products at Walmart.
Nobody cares about iMessage. It's not impressive. I as a Apple user want to be safe and secure, and Apple is keeping me away from thar goal by disallowing me to use the standard first party SMS service to use standardized RCP. It's a matter of security and not iMessage.This shouldn't be a surprise to anybody.
If you want iPhone features, buy an iPhone. I'll never understand this android obsession with wanting iMessage or blue bubbles. It's like the guy who puts a BMW emblem on his old Honda.
I think some people don’t buy Android to keep it. Not exclusively, but as a piece of the lock-in puzzle. The logic is simple, if it wasn’t so, Apple wouldn’t make it.You think anyone buys Apple to get iMessage? LOL
I agree.I believe their mistake was to not tie it to an Apple ID and go straight to the servers with Apple‘s protocol. Therefore not tying a link between the iMessage ID and the Apple ID. Without that tie-up it doesn’t work on Apple devices.
Apple possibly went into the traffic, associated which users are not connected to any Apple ID and deleted their access.
Not true. We've got full (root) access to the MacOS. That means it is possible to inject our own trusted cert or patch iMessage/iCloud related files to not rely on Apple's certificate. With that, you are able to perform SSL strip and sniff the communication in MitM attack.Then I must assume the added another encrypted key on the communication layer to pre-encrypt signaling to the servers on newer iOS, Mac etc. devices and left all others effectively „dead”. End of story. They won’t be able to „hack” this because it’s encrypted and they can’t break that encryption. Game over.
When was the last time you used Android (supposing you have used it)On a subpar os that you are craving to use iOS features like iMessage.
step it through in your head. this will create tons of confusion when apple creates a new feature and this unofficial solution breaks.
it really does become annoying on how people can see all positives and zero negatives on situations like this.
I believe their mistake was to not tie it to an Apple ID and go straight to the servers with Apple‘s protocol. Therefore not tying a link between the iMessage ID and the Apple ID. Without that tie-up it doesn’t work on Apple devices.
Apple possibly went into the traffic, associated which users are not connected to any Apple ID and deleted their access.
Then I must assume the added another encrypted key on the communication layer to pre-encrypt signaling to the servers on newer iOS, Mac etc. devices and left all others effectively „dead”. End of story. They won’t be able to „hack” this because it’s encrypted and they can’t break that encryption. Game over.
lol no i am literally repeating what macrumors users have been complaining about for weeks.
"think about the children. they are bullied"
Lmao what? There a bajillion cross platform apps that are free Apple would look ridiculous charging for thisI would actually pay Apple a monthly subscription on my Android devices for iMessage and FaceTime. I prefer Android over iOS, so having iMessage and FaceTime would be worth it to me if Apple releases them.
That's how they support the Church.Lmao what? There a bajillion cross platform apps that are free Apple would look ridiculous charging for this
Why so desperate to give Apple everything jeez
Not true. Maybe Android users in US? Definitely not in the EU. Majority of ppl are using Whatsapp or Telegram there.That no one cares about except android users lmao.
Eddy Cue literally said that iMessage costs them virtually nothing to run as it piggybacks off of their other infrastructure, like APN.“A few” = 3.6 billion Android users.
You think those apps don’t make money? Telegram and WhatsApp both have ads. Telegram also sells subscriptions. Do you want ads in iMessage? Or an iMessage subscription? Signal relies on donors; who knows how long that will be sustainable for.
Apple makes money from you buying their hardware. That’s why iMessage is free on Apple devices. If you’re using an Android device and have no Apple hardware, what incentive would Apple have to provide a free service? That makes absolutely no sense. Paying Apple customers would be subsidizing that.