Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
This was totally expected no doubt. no way apple would let a company make money off their product.
 
It’s the want for cross-platform iMessage
Aka blue bubbles.

If you want cross platform messages we have been had that for nearly 2 decades now with various messaging apps that exists.

I rather y’all just admit you want blue bubbles. Because you keep denying blue bubbles want yet you want iMessage aka blue bubbles lmao.

You’re getting RCS and you’re still wanting blue bubbles.

So as I said many many many times. android users want blue bubbles because android users are the ones who care about color. Not iPhone users.

This is getting ridiculous and pathetic IMO. Paying $2 a month for blue bubbles? Embrace being green.
I mean green literally is androids color 😂🤣


This is because Whatsapp etc is used as a replacement for SMS, not as a replacement for iMessage. SMS is much more used in US than in Europe. Almost all Whatsapp threads I have were started by an Android user, because they stopped using SMS. If I send a text to an Android user, most of them will reply back using Whatsapp (I think Telegram is an Eastern Europe thing?)

I haven’t actively used WhatsApp in awhile. Can you sms through it.

These days in America, for the 15-35 demographic it seems Snapchat is more the go to these days.
 
I haven’t actively used WhatsApp in awhile. Can you sms through it.
No. If I send a text I don’t notice whether it is sent as SMS or iMessage. If an Android user receives an SMS, they now have my phone number, which enables them to send a Whatsapp message back. If they have an iPhone, they will typically just reply with iMessage. I do have a meaningful amount of people insisting on FB Messenger, which annoys the crap out of me.
These days in America, for the 15-35 demographic it seems Snapchat is more the go to these days.
I don’t communicate much with that demographic, but my perception is you are right.

I think the idea of one unified messaging platform that everyone uses is a pipe dream. That ship has sailed. We might as well just get used to fragmented messaging.
 
This shouldn't be a surprise to anybody.

If you want iPhone features, buy an iPhone. I'll never understand this android obsession with wanting iMessage or blue bubbles. It's like the guy who puts a BMW emblem on his old Honda.
Nobody cares about iMessage. It's not impressive. I as a Apple user want to be safe and secure, and Apple is keeping me away from thar goal by disallowing me to use the standard first party SMS service to use standardized RCP. It's a matter of security and not iMessage.
 
You think anyone buys Apple to get iMessage? LOL
I think some people don’t buy Android to keep it. Not exclusively, but as a piece of the lock-in puzzle. The logic is simple, if it wasn’t so, Apple wouldn’t make it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3530025
People on here get so wound up, If you use Android that's a choice, so is iOS I have both and like the Pixel 8 and the iPhone 14 Pro 1TB. Apples's iMessage should be universal, not held in the claw like clutch of iOS users only. It makes chatting with friends who don't use iOS a total pain.

I don't use WhatsApp or any of the other apps, I text simple as that and my phone be it Android or iOS based should be able to just send any colour bubble as if the colour even even matters. The fact that phones can't send images etc unless you pay dumb prices for picture messaging to Android phones and vice versa without downloading yet more apps feels almost juvenile.

Android and iOS phones should be open to messaging each other without this ridiculous tussle between Google and Apple, iMessage is just a messaging app, it's not a family heirloom. Communication should be open to whatever phone you like, this thread has so much negativity about comunicating with other people because they use a different phone OS, that just seems totally rediculous to me.
 
Don’t understand why this is an issue in the US. If Apple wants to exclude half the population, then why not all move to another platform that everyone can access: Telegram, Signal, WhatsApp, Messenger, … the list is endless. Seems the entire world moved on, except the US.

Look, Apple made the strategic error over a decade ago not to open up iMessage and FaceTime (even after Steve announced they would). They could have owned the biggest global messaging platform, but they don’t. And now they never will. Sad but true.
 
Who in their right mind didn’t see this coming?

If there’s no legislation preventing Apple from making iMessage exclusive to its products then hacking your way to get it to work on non-Apple devices is theft of intellectual property.
 
It was always going to happen. The best you can ask for is RCS. However, if Apple want to keep iMessage as an ecosystem specific feature you can’t force them to put it in other platforms. I am all in on the Apple ecosystem but I personally couldn’t care less about iMessage. However if I was that bothered about having it, like Tim says buy an iPhone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Harthag and 3530025
I believe their mistake was to not tie it to an Apple ID and go straight to the servers with Apple‘s protocol. Therefore not tying a link between the iMessage ID and the Apple ID. Without that tie-up it doesn’t work on Apple devices.
Apple possibly went into the traffic, associated which users are not connected to any Apple ID and deleted their access.
I agree.

Then I must assume the added another encrypted key on the communication layer to pre-encrypt signaling to the servers on newer iOS, Mac etc. devices and left all others effectively „dead”. End of story. They won’t be able to „hack” this because it’s encrypted and they can’t break that encryption. Game over.
Not true. We've got full (root) access to the MacOS. That means it is possible to inject our own trusted cert or patch iMessage/iCloud related files to not rely on Apple's certificate. With that, you are able to perform SSL strip and sniff the communication in MitM attack.

So unless Apple is putting some unique long key into every iMessage compatible device and keeps database of such keys and those keys are long enough, so it is not possible to guess them (i.e. Apple devices serial number is not long enough, you can brute force this). So unless Apple is doing this, there's not any ultimate solution for Apple to detect whether you are coming from device spoofing itself as Apple device or whether you are real Apple device. All other attempts, except unique key burned in to each Apple device, means Apple will just make it harder for reverse engineering, but not impossible. It would be cat and mouse game.
 
step it through in your head. this will create tons of confusion when apple creates a new feature and this unofficial solution breaks.

it really does become annoying on how people can see all positives and zero negatives on situations like this.

That still doesn't make a lot of sense to me. The whole point was simply so that Android users could participate in things like group chats and that everything in the chat would flow normally like iMessage. It really isn't that big of a deal.

I'm still failing to see what the negatives are. I mean I'm an iPhone user but I don't begrudge someone who wants to use Android. What are the negatives you are seeing here again?
 
  • Like
Reactions: ebika
I believe their mistake was to not tie it to an Apple ID and go straight to the servers with Apple‘s protocol. Therefore not tying a link between the iMessage ID and the Apple ID. Without that tie-up it doesn’t work on Apple devices.
Apple possibly went into the traffic, associated which users are not connected to any Apple ID and deleted their access.
Then I must assume the added another encrypted key on the communication layer to pre-encrypt signaling to the servers on newer iOS, Mac etc. devices and left all others effectively „dead”. End of story. They won’t be able to „hack” this because it’s encrypted and they can’t break that encryption. Game over.

Nah that's not it. You could skip the phone number and tie it directly to your Apple ID and they still blocked the service.
 
Those puerile iOS vs Android wars are so funny, like those PC vs Mac of yesterday
And better when I am on both sides (S22 and i14) and like both OS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: toobravetosave
I would actually pay Apple a monthly subscription on my Android devices for iMessage and FaceTime. I prefer Android over iOS, so having iMessage and FaceTime would be worth it to me if Apple releases them.
Lmao what? There a bajillion cross platform apps that are free Apple would look ridiculous charging for this

Why so desperate to give Apple everything jeez
 
  • Love
Reactions: 3530025
That no one cares about except android users lmao.
Not true. Maybe Android users in US? Definitely not in the EU. Majority of ppl are using Whatsapp or Telegram there.
So they really do not care about message colors in the iPhone's messaging app. And definitely not Android users (because guess what, they don't see those iPhone message app colors).


Yeah, it's the US iPhone users who care about green bubbles. The article above is just one of many.
 
“A few” = 3.6 billion Android users.

You think those apps don’t make money? Telegram and WhatsApp both have ads. Telegram also sells subscriptions. Do you want ads in iMessage? Or an iMessage subscription? Signal relies on donors; who knows how long that will be sustainable for.

Apple makes money from you buying their hardware. That’s why iMessage is free on Apple devices. If you’re using an Android device and have no Apple hardware, what incentive would Apple have to provide a free service? That makes absolutely no sense. Paying Apple customers would be subsidizing that.
Eddy Cue literally said that iMessage costs them virtually nothing to run as it piggybacks off of their other infrastructure, like APN.

It‘s part of the Apple v Epic trial leaked mails and was one of the reasons Cue wanted iMessage on Android: because it‘s essentially a drop in the ocean for them in terms of upkeep.

Never happened because the vast majority of Apple execs play into the whole ecosystem lock-in stigma iMessage provides, so they dismissed his proposal.
 
Well, it's really upset that guys from Beeper will not receive bounty for uncovered vulnerability.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.