Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
This reminds me of that time Palm reverse engineered iTunes to have their devices show up like iPods. Apple was also swift to shut that down.
 
  • Like
Reactions: killawat
To be clear, does Apple have the right to shut this down?... Absolutely.

Is it a bad look for a company that prizes user security, data privacy, teens' mental health, and the best user experience? ....Absolutely.

This comes down to money, which will likely catch the attention of various regulatory bodies.
Apple Pay for and provide the infrastructure. This is paid for through the sale of their own hardware. If Apple wanted to open up iMessage to Android users then that is a decision for them to make. I think they should make iMessage cross platform but charge for it on Android. Maybe $9.99 per month which includes 5GB of message storage.
 
Uh no. That's nowhere near to be called "hack".

Hack means you can steal data or enter secured system by defeating it's security. None of those were made here.
How is it not “defeating it’s security”? It is clearly an unauthorised use of a network system. There’s no requirement on how secure a security system needs to be before you can call it “hacking” to use it in an unauthorised way. You are abusing the bandwith of a server designed for a different use.

If someone leaves their car unlocked with the keys in the ignition, it still doesn’t give you the right to take it (which I have witnessed people claim, IRL)
 
If I ever become a tech startup CEO, I’ll make a point of not underestimating or provoking Apple.

This whole debacle reminds me of that Pebble Watch CEO downplaying the threat posed by the Apple Watch. Maybe these two should become friends?
 
Yeah, because few additional iMessage users surely means Apple has to charge for this service...

Because Telegram, WhatsApp and Signal is not free. It's like messaging service is resource heavy or something.
They are not free. If they are free, how did Whatsapp reach one billion USD revenue? Signal is a non-profit, that runs on donations, that doesn’t mean it doesn’t carry a cost. Whatsapp you pay for through mining of your data. Telegram has premium options that costs money.

Could Apple afford that cost? Of course. Apple could buy a Christmas present for every citizen on the globe. But Apple is not a non-profit. Access to iMessage on Android could be a very valid paid service that Apple could potentially offer, so of course they can’t allow third parties to gain unauthorised access.
 
Kids these days getting all worked up over bubble colors; haven’t they ever read Dr. Seuss’s original “The Lemmings” ?
 
Because every Android user cares for reverse engineered iMessage, yes...


Say "I did not use WhatsApp" without saying it. WhatsApp does not have any ads. Yes, I'm using it as a primary messanger, so I would know that. Not a single ad. You don't know what you're talkinig about.
Agreed, but, Whatsapp is not free. You pay with your data, and Whatsapp has a revenue of a billion dollars.
That's where I agree with you. But you know what?

I don't have problem with Apple blocking this thing after it really stresses their infrastructure. But cutting it off so quickly just speaks for itself. Walled garden is just so precious for Apple. They are so afraid to lost it. So funny.
Yeah, it’s almost like they are trying to earn money.
 
If this had been a neighbor who decided to profit off you having your own cable channel and found a way to tap into your set up, and then charge other people to use a reversed engineered app, most of you would be singing a different tune. Since it is Apple, many seem to think Apple should allow it to continue. That is really messed up thinking.
Best analogy yet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iOS Geek
As an iPhone user, I really don’t have a horse in this race. However, I am very surprised Apple isn’t capitalizing on the business opportunity here. They continue to soak Apple One users with increases, so why not make I message cross platform and charge users $50 a year for it. Millions would pay, and this just drops straight to the bottom line.

It makes zero sense to me. As an Apple family, we aren’t moving to Android because iMessage is on it.

Sure, some might, but I’d bet they pay the extra $50 a year. I’d almost bet folks would pay $100 a year for it.

Seems crazy not to take advantage of this.
Simple: They estimate that their revenue loss elsewhere (i.e. less people buying iPhones that provide both direct and indirect revenue) would be higher.

Apple already makes money on Android users, with Apple Music. Clearly they have a different calculation there. And that calculation is/should be Apple’s right to make.
 
Tbh, iMessage is only used in US. Rest of the world uses WhatsApp, Telegram or WeChat. The much hyped blue bubble is certainly not a prestige issue atleast in India. Here people would laugh at you on your face if they find out that you are using obscure iMessage which no one uses. 😂
So, because you are in India, you know how the EU works? I use probably 80% iMessage. I don’t know a single person using Telegram.

I do agree that the “blue bubble” fascination is a US thing though.
 
So.. my friend set this up for himself and now that it's deleted, my phone sends messages via SMS just fine, but trying to use iMessage on the Mac keeps defaulting to iMessage rather than SMS. anyone know how to reset this on my side?
Find new friends 😁

This is very interesting, and I think you should report back on whether he will be succesful: You can’t do it from your side, you need to ask your friend to de-register from iMessage:


Whether this will work when he never officially registered in the first place is highly interesting.
 
That's cute.

I did try to warn people not to use a knock-off app to access imessage for a subpar OS.

I do hope in the future should this pop back up, that both this epic failure of 3 days (LMAO) and whatever that other company that literally got hacked deter people from using shady means to get access to something.

As i said in a post before, this is PRECISELY why android has the reputation it has of being a cheap OS to pirate on.

Also, this is one of the few times Android users actually PAID for an app so paid apps adoption rates are not as high as on IOS...
My company makes globally distributed premium hardware products. The amount of iOS vs Android users among our customers is about 8 to 1. Even though there are many more Android users in the world. On average, Android users simply don’t buy premium products, which is why iOS is a much more desirable platform to access, than Android.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mescagnus
My company makes globally distributed premium hardware products. The amount of iOS vs Android users among our customers is about 8 to 1. Even though there are many more Android users in the world. On average, Android users simply don’t buy premium products, which is why iOS is a much more desirable platform to access, than Android.

It’s ironically androids ability to side load and pirate apps that is why there is less paid app adoption.

I wonder what it would like if iOS allows side loading
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Harthag
Similar free apps have ads. You want ads in iMessage? I don’t.

iMessage is a benefit of buying an Apple device. Companies are allowed to have exclusive features on their platforms as a competitive differentiator. Google has plenty of Android-exclusive features. Where is the demand for them to bring all of them to their iOS apps?

Just because some messenger apps have ads, doesn’t mean Apple would need to do that on Android. Why do you think that’s inevitable?

Google literally has dozens of free apps and services which are fully supported and updated regularly on iOS, most without ads. Sometimes, those apps get features before their Android counterparts. They literally brought free turn-by-turn GPS navigation to older iPhones when Apple wouldn’t.

People request features all the time. The difference is that iMessage has become somewhat of a social network in the sense that it contains years of interactions. You shouldn’t have to throw that all away because you chose to buy a different brand phone. You shouldn’t have to bother your friends by making them use different apps/protocols if you switch to Android.

Everyone demanded Apple support RCS because it has many of the features of iMessage. Now Apple is doing so, and the goalposts are moving to “Apple needs to support iMessage itself on Android.” I’m sure if that happens, there will be some other complaint and the goalposts will move again.

Where can the goalposts move from there? SMS was overdue for an upgrade, and RCS fulfills that need. iMessage on Android would have its own set of benefits. It would be the final nail in coffin in this dumb saga over bubbles.
 
So, because you are in India, you know how the EU works? I use probably 80% iMessage. I don’t know a single person using Telegram.

I do agree that the “blue bubble” fascination is a US thing though.
They do have a point. iMessage is not commonly used in Europe.

I spent a many of summers there and it’s why I had to get used to using telegram and whatsapp.

The blue bubble phenomena is an android based narrative. As an American iMessage user, most do not care
 
Then you will hear kids are being bullied in America...they aren't lmfao. it's 2023. Galaxies. Pixels. Iphones are all popular choices (especially the foldable phones).

In Short, it's BS.
If you asked me to stereotype this, I have now had four people bragging, two of them trying to belittle my choice, because they have a foldable. Which I of cause find hilariously clueless. It’s been years since I heard anyone brag that they have an iPhone, because (here) that’s what everyone has.
 
That no one cares about except android users lmao.
Sir please take a look at the name of this website. This isn’t a one-sided thing. You’ve been replying to Apple users that disagree with you on this throughout the day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3530025
It’s ironically androids ability to side load and pirate apps that is why there is less paid app adoption.

I wonder what it would like if iOS allows side loading
1: This just highlights the trend that Android users don’t want to pay for stuff.

2: I am not willing to believe that the majority of Android users is side loading or pirating. Those are power user concepts. The majority of Android users just want a cheap phone. This is not a stereotype, but a fact - I am not saying “all”, but the majority. The majority of users among both platforms don’t have the skill or interest to side load apps.

When people talk about “everyone”, it’s usually really “a small group of people that are similar to myself”. Not in fact the majority. (I just did it myselfs a couple of posts ago…)
 
Sir please take a look at the name of this website. This isn’t a one-sided thing. You’ve been replying to Apple users that disagree with you on this throughout the day.
Show me an Apple user in this thread that cares about blue bubble.
 
  • Like
Reactions: grover5
They do have a point. iMessage is not commonly used in Europe.

I spent a many of summers there and it’s why I had to get used to using telegram and whatsapp.

The blue bubble phenomena is an android based narrative. As an American iMessage user, most do not care
This is because Whatsapp etc is used as a replacement for SMS, not as a replacement for iMessage. SMS is much more used in US than in Europe. Almost all Whatsapp threads I have were started by an Android user, because they stopped using SMS. If I send a text to an Android user, most of them will reply back using Whatsapp (I think Telegram is an Eastern Europe thing?)
 
  • Like
Reactions: missingar
This is getting ridiculous and pathetic IMO. Paying $2 a month for blue bubbles? Embrace being green.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.