Let them pay base model iPhone at $5000. People don’t even upgrade iPhone every year anymore, so such price hike won’t matter as much.You want iPhone to be $2000?
You want iPhone to be $2000?
So you thought it was just moving away from China and open up in India?
As if Indian infrastructure, logistics, know-how, educational system, work ethics, management, leader philosophy, quality assurance and so on are anywhere near those of China…
Egg preceded chicken, by a few hundred million years. What's this got to do with the price of eggs anyway?
These People are not thankful to be working and have jobs?
And who exactly is going to assemble them in the USA? We have to call in the national guard to drive our school buses and help in hospitals because of a worker shortage (and these are good paying jobs). You can’t pay the assemblers minimum wage e.g. $15/hour since it’s much easier at that salary to be a gas station clerk or to drive for Uber eats at an average of $18/hour. Let’s take an average production line worker at a non union Honda plant in Ohio for example, they would make about $21/hour an assuming a 40hour week and 2 weeks of vacation per year that’s about $42k annual salary. Now Apple would have to pay more since it’s in the crosshairs and tiny component assembly is more tiresome so let’s say about $45-50k annual. In the US, benefits add about 30% on top of salary so the FTE cost per assembler is about $58-70k annually. And that’s if you can find 20,000 people who want to sit there for 8 hours a day putting things together. So even if everyone in the world were willing to pay $1200 for a base iPhone 13 you’d be hard pressed staffing your plant.Apple products need to be made in the USA.
Exploiting foreign workers should not be in their playbook even if they use intermediary companies like gloves.
Hey Moneybags, if you watch the news at all, you'd see most people in the US having a hard time making ends meet with inflation, high gasoline prices, literally everything going up in price. Should an iPhone cost $2000, watch your Apple stock take a nose dive. Would that bother you?that would not bother me at all.
I'm sort of surprised the entire assembly process isn't automated by now. I wonder if the technology exists to fully assemble phones and laptops 100% by automation?And who exactly is going to assemble them in the USA? We have to call in the national guard to drive our school buses and help in hospitals because of a worker shortage (and these are good paying jobs). You can’t pay the assemblers minimum wage e.g. $15/hour since it’s much easier at that salary to be a gas station clerk or to drive for Uber eats at an average of $18/hour. Let’s take an average production line worker at a non union Honda plant in Ohio for example, they would make about $21/hour an assuming a 40hour week and 2 weeks of vacation per year that’s about $42k annual salary. Now Apple would have to pay more since it’s in the crosshairs and tiny component assembly is more tiresome so let’s say about $45-50k annual. In the US, benefits add about 30% on top of salary so the FTE cost per assembler is about $58-70k annually. And that’s if you can find 20,000 people who want to sit there for 8 hours a day putting things together. So even if everyone in the world were willing to pay $1200 for a base iPhone 13 you’d be hard pressed staffing your plant.
Apple does create jobs... by designing products that people want to buy. If that stops, the wheels fall off pretty quickly.Apple doesn't create jobs. Consumers buying their products create jobs. No consumers = no jobs.
Maximizing profits and taking care of customers are not mutually exclusive.Let's assume for a brief fantasy moment that iPhones are made in the USA.
What do you think will come first?
(a) consumers willing to pay substantially more for their devices
or
(b) Apple and Apple shareholders willing to earn less
If there's one thing that's become crystal clear from all the recent legal entanglements Apple's been involved in it's that they're a (capital "c") Company just like any other. And there's nothing wrong with that as long as you follow the laws on the books.
All the feel-good, lovey-dovey, prose is there to serve the one thing every Company wants: more profits and shareholder return.
To quote Metallica: Nothing Else Matters.
Let's assume for a brief fantasy moment that iPhones are made in the USA.
What do you think will come first?
(a) consumers willing to pay substantially more for their devices
or
(b) Apple and Apple shareholders willing to earn less
If there's one thing that's become crystal clear from all the recent legal entanglements Apple's been involved in it's that they're a (capital "c") Company just like any other. And there's nothing wrong with that as long as you follow the laws on the books.
All the feel-good, lovey-dovey, prose is there to serve the one thing every Company wants: more profits and shareholder return.
To quote Metallica: Nothing Else Matters.
Why? Because you don’t own apple products?that would not bother me at all.
They are.Maximizing profits and taking care of customers are not mutually exclusive.
Those Uyghur workers are usually seen selling foods on the streets throughout China, or dwelling in their illegal cellar mosques, but thanks to extensive government programs to eradicate radicalism and poverty, Uyghurs are increasingly seen in textile production and other sorts of manufacturing, mainly in Xinjiang. Not in cotton, though, as that industry is nearly fully automated, but maybe soon in rare earth production? Come again, you want to boycott rare earths??Right, cause conditions at Chinese factories are superb!!! Those uighur workers sure have a great life... Maybe the main difference is that Chinese workers just know better than to protest living or work conditions.
No they are not. Profits before customers results in Enron or Bernie Mafoff.They are.
By the definition of maximization.
If iPhones are made in the US, the $999 model needs to be at least $25,000.You want iPhone to be $2000?
You need to squeeze your customers as hard as you can while giving them a drip of life to be squeezed again later.No they are not. Profits before customers results in Enron or Bernie Mafoff.
One billion Apple customers trumps your opinion, imo.You need to squeeze your customers as hard as you can while giving them a drip of life to be squeezed again later.
In the mean time, sell them the dream.
Manufacturing and SHIPPING cars is much more different than cellphones. Shipping cars across continents plays a major role for local manufacturing. Whereas, in cellphone manufacturing, companies tries to maximize their profits while making them w/ cheap labor.At the very least, they should be made in the large markets that they are sold... Make Chinese market products in China. Make US market products in the US. Make EU market products in the EU. Smaller markets can get products made in whatever the closes or cheapest large market is.
This is what all the auto manufacturers do. If they can do it for cars, I'm sure they can do it for cell phones.
If they really wanted to try, they would operate and manage their manufacturing plants themselves - even if it was in "cheap labour" markets.You say that they could at least try. But that’s exactly what they are doing - read the article again.