CanadianGrit said:
dkoralek said:
It is correct that Santa Rosa is a Centrino upgrade. Napa was, as well. However, Centrino isn't a processor, it is a _platform_ which includes a processor, chipset, wifi, and onboard graphics. It is not designed for high end laptops, but meant for a lower cost all in one platform, which is why the higher speed and better performing processors of a particular type (say the core 2 duo) aren't usually included in a centrino labeled machine (Apple hasn't gone this route yet, and it isn't clear that they will; if they do, it would only be in the macbook and not the macbook pro). Now, Crestline, which is the mobile 965 chipset (and the chipset that is part of the santa rosa platform) for use with merom core 2 duos, will likely be included in future upgrades to the macbook pro and macbook lines. They will also support the new socket for future merom chips. So, you are correct that santa rosa is the successor to the centrino line (which is currently labeled centrino duo for the core processors) and will be called "centrino pro" when it is out. But this is completely independent of being able to use a merom core 2 duo processor or not.
Cheers.
Then back to my original point. We will not see Santa Rosa in the macbook pro. The Macbook might see it, seeing that Apple has chosen integrated graphics this is not an impossible senario.
Personally I was hoping Centrino was used in the macbook (sadly it was not) because Centrino means longer battery life (its 3:30+ on a pc, so will be much higher on a mac) and less heat. For power and gaming I would simply take out my iMac or my pcs.
The way I see it is this, the Macbook Pro is designed to be a desktop replacement, while the Macbook is designed to be a portable machine. So the Pro should get a powerful processor while the macbook should get a portable processor. Apple might agree with me, that might be the reason we have not seen a Core 2 Duo Macbook. But it could be in line with their philosophy, first an upgrade to the Pro then the upgrade for everyone else. We will just have to wait and see.
Yes will we see components of the Santa Rosa platform in the MBP without question! Very, very likely Crestline, but perhaps not all components. People on this thread simply don't know what they are talking about. Crestline is available in two versions, one with integrated Intel graphics GPU, another for 3rd party (Nvidia or ATI as Apple sees fit to use at that time) GPUs, Integrated GPU is GM965, 3rd party separate is denoted PM965.
My sticky post (well it needs to be a sticky post, cause people just can't seem to get it) from the biggie 'MBP update by the holidays' thread. Read it, read the links that explain what new features come into play with the Santa Rosa platform, which makes it more sophisticated than Napa by far, inform yourselves, please:
https://forums.macrumors.com/posts/2943835/
Huh, who was that poster that claims all the bugs have been worked out on this current update?
It is too soon to tell. Sure any revision in the future will have some bugs, it remains to see if they are major or minor in nature. I'd much rather have
all the possible new improvements (please Apple at least a 2k res screen on the MBP17, for Christ's Sake!) Blu-Ray slot load burner, faster FSB, more advanced power saving features, faster Merom at the top end, 7.2k rpm 160GB Seagate drive when they come out in the Spring, not 1/2 year after the fact like on this update with the 5.4k 160GB drives, possible hybrid NAND flash memory for faster OS/apps launches, booting; a low power dissipating GPU to replace the excessively old x1600, NV Geforce Go 7700 is already on a PC laptop, ATI already has announced a better/similar model that supersedes the aging x1600.
The list is long the possible improvements that will hopefully come with the introduction of the Intel Santa Rosa supporting chips in the 1st part of 2007. If Apple adopts and is able to utilize many of these improvements, I guarantee you they will sell like hot cakes, and people will think this current
minor update is such a dog in comparison, those people many of them will be selling off these early C2D MBPs for sure.