Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Me1000 said:
APPLE....

UPDAtE THE MACBOOKS!!!!!!!!!

Don't you know that Apple has never and will never make 2 big announcements like that on 1 day!

The MBPs were first because they were released long before the MacBooks were!!!
 
mac4evan said:
Oh ok good to know.

Woah I just noticed they have the 2.16ghz with 1 gig ram and 256mb video for only 1599 but they list the exact same thing for 2149 on the same page! What is going on? Thats an even better deal than the 1449 for the ram alone.
 
thunda32 said:
Woah I just noticed they have the 2.16ghz with 1 gig ram and 256mb video for only 1599 but they list the exact same thing for 2149 on the same page! What is going on? Thats an even better deal than the 1449 for the ram alone.

The only thing I can think of is the difference in condition. Also, it has been my observation that the listing of specs for the models on the page always inconsistent in format and in word usage.
 
mac4evan said:
The only thing I can think of is the difference in condition. Also, it has been my observation that the listing of specs for the models on the page always inconsistent in format and in word usage.

I would think they would disclose the difference. Seems like they all go through the same refurb proccess right?
 
bodeh6 said:
I Just say this graph on Gizmodo.

That's retarded all right. None of those companies shipped merom machines in August, and they all shipped at different times. The first ones started showing up in mid September, and most didn't have real quantity until even later.

Even looking at PC websites NOW, I'm seeing ship dates later than what apple is saying.
 
Btw, anyone knows if there is any huge difference between the x1600 128mb and the 256mb version?
 
Noooooooo!

Chimera said:
We've alreaddy seen threads entitled "Waiting for Santa Rosa" though, I think this will be a never ending cycle under intel. :(

Now look what you've done. I was all excited about Merom and now I'm waiting for Santa Rosa.
 
adiosk8 said:
what is everyones ship times? I ordered mine at 10 am this morning and my estimated arrival date is nov 2. anyone else's sooner then that?

I ordered mine around 11am and my arrival date is Nov 13, and that's with the 2-3 day ship option selected . .. so consider yourself lucky!
 
prezpat2020 said:
Why would anyone spend $2,000 +, when you can hold off for a few months and get Leopard pre-installed, or wait a bit longer and get Leopard pre-installed WITH the Santa Rosa, flash-booting chip.

There's no way I'm buying a MBP for that much money so close to a new OS launch that will cost an extra couple hundred... not to mention the promise of the Santa Rosa... HOLD OFF!


Uhhh.. Apple will not charge "a couple hundred" dollars, look at the pricing right now! I've often seen Tiger for sale for $130. And as for waiting for Santa Rosa....well with that attitude you'll never get a computer ever!
 
CanadianGrit said:
dkoralek said:
It is correct that Santa Rosa is a Centrino upgrade. Napa was, as well. However, Centrino isn't a processor, it is a _platform_ which includes a processor, chipset, wifi, and onboard graphics. It is not designed for high end laptops, but meant for a lower cost all in one platform, which is why the higher speed and better performing processors of a particular type (say the core 2 duo) aren't usually included in a centrino labeled machine (Apple hasn't gone this route yet, and it isn't clear that they will; if they do, it would only be in the macbook and not the macbook pro). Now, Crestline, which is the mobile 965 chipset (and the chipset that is part of the santa rosa platform) for use with merom core 2 duos, will likely be included in future upgrades to the macbook pro and macbook lines. They will also support the new socket for future merom chips. So, you are correct that santa rosa is the successor to the centrino line (which is currently labeled centrino duo for the core processors) and will be called "centrino pro" when it is out. But this is completely independent of being able to use a merom core 2 duo processor or not.

Cheers.
Then back to my original point. We will not see Santa Rosa in the macbook pro. The Macbook might see it, seeing that Apple has chosen integrated graphics this is not an impossible senario.

Personally I was hoping Centrino was used in the macbook (sadly it was not) because Centrino means longer battery life (it’s 3:30+ on a pc, so will be much higher on a mac) and less heat. For power and gaming I would simply take out my iMac or my pcs.

The way I see it is this, the Macbook Pro is designed to be a desktop replacement, while the Macbook is designed to be a portable machine. So the Pro should get a powerful processor while the macbook should get a portable processor. Apple might agree with me, that might be the reason we have not seen a Core 2 Duo Macbook. But it could be in line with their philosophy, first an upgrade to the Pro then the upgrade for everyone else. We will just have to wait and see.

Yes will we see components of the Santa Rosa platform in the MBP without question! Very, very likely Crestline, but perhaps not all components. People on this thread simply don't know what they are talking about. Crestline is available in two versions, one with integrated Intel graphics GPU, another for 3rd party (Nvidia or ATI as Apple sees fit to use at that time) GPUs, Integrated GPU is GM965, 3rd party separate is denoted PM965.



My sticky post (well it needs to be a sticky post, cause people just can't seem to get it) from the biggie 'MBP update by the holidays' thread. Read it, read the links that explain what new features come into play with the Santa Rosa platform, which makes it more sophisticated than Napa by far, inform yourselves, please:

https://forums.macrumors.com/posts/2943835/

Huh, who was that poster that claims all the bugs have been worked out on this current update? It is too soon to tell. Sure any revision in the future will have some bugs, it remains to see if they are major or minor in nature. I'd much rather have all the possible new improvements (please Apple at least a 2k res screen on the MBP17, for Christ's Sake!) Blu-Ray slot load burner, faster FSB, more advanced power saving features, faster Merom at the top end, 7.2k rpm 160GB Seagate drive when they come out in the Spring, not 1/2 year after the fact like on this update with the 5.4k 160GB drives, possible hybrid NAND flash memory for faster OS/apps launches, booting; a low power dissipating GPU to replace the excessively old x1600, NV Geforce Go 7700 is already on a PC laptop, ATI already has announced a better/similar model that supersedes the aging x1600.

The list is long the possible improvements that will hopefully come with the introduction of the Intel Santa Rosa supporting chips in the 1st part of 2007. If Apple adopts and is able to utilize many of these improvements, I guarantee you they will sell like hot cakes, and people will think this current minor update is such a dog in comparison, those people many of them will be selling off these early C2D MBPs for sure.
 
7200 Vs. 5200 HD

Does anyone know if going with the 100 gig 7200 rpm hardrive offers any improved performance? I don't know if I can wait till the 15th for a custom 17".
 
mac4evan said:
Yes but in my opinion the 64-bit support is a bigger deal then people are making it out to be. Like I said in a previous post... "I unerstand about not needing the 64-bit capabilities but remember that with Leopard not too far off (having all that 64-bit support) then you may want to think about it for the future. After Leopard, more apps will take at least SOME advantage (or maybe all) of the 64-bit power. And after 10.5 64-bit support and performance will just get better (optimization etc.)

A lot of people keep mentioning Leopard and 64bit, but Leopard will run just fine on the 32bit hardware too. 64bit isn't going to give Leopard itself any magic speed boost and 64bit software can run under Tiger right now...

But I agree 64bit support is a lot bigger than people think. For applications that are optimized for a 64bit instruction pipeline, the benefits can be huge. I do a lot of 3D rendering and like to use it as an example. 64bit versions of Lightwave (PC only for now, unfortunately) and Maya show speed bumps of 10 to 35 % over the 32bit counterpart software when running on teh same hardware - just the 64bit version being better optimized to use it. Generally speaking, for 32bit apps, C2D is only going to give an average 5 to 10 % speed up, just because it's a bit more efficient and has a larger cache on the faster models that Apple is using.

And like I said in a previoous reply (page 19)... the C2Ds have much improved SSEx integer units. For me thats a HUGE plus!!!

aka rendering, ripping, and encoding = faster faster faster"

This is huge... And where I'm sure Apple gets those amazing 39% faster benchmarks for FCP when comparing the new 2.33GHz MBP to the previous 2.16GHz CD model. I can't wait until mine gets here so I can try it out...
 
lxpk said:
Now look what you've done. I was all excited about Merom and now I'm waiting for Santa Rosa.


For those in the know, what does the Santa Rosa spec offer for the MacBook Pro other than a bump in the system bus from 667 to 800mhz.

Considering that HDD is the slow component in the system, and memory performance bump from 667 to 800 would be minor compared to GPU and Processor performance.

Is Santa Rosa really bringing anything to the table?
 
countach said:
Hmm.............,

Macbook Pro 15", 2GB RAM, 120 MB drive - $2174

Black Macbook, 2GB RAM, 120MB drive - $2199

WHAT's WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE?????
Why do you assume there is something wrong with the picture.

There a lot of low end computers that start off less expensive than the higher model, but as you start adding components to the lower end machine it becomes more expensive and less powerful. Does that mean Apple should lower the prices for the MacBook? No, if someone really wants a Black MacBook and are willing to spend money to upgrade it so that it will still be slower than a MacBook Pro then great.

There's no rule that requires Apple to constantly adjust their prices so that all configurations of line X is always cheaper than all configurations of line Y.
 
bigb0y said:
Does the Protection Plan cover accidentals? And do you think it is worth the money to get a protection plan?

Thanks
I only bought it for my laptop, which needed it. However I soon learned that it did not cover the crack screen.

I have not bought on since. However, my brother does and we've had two old laptops fixed, no questions asked.
 
Something I read above suggests that a 2.16 Yonah runs hotter than a 2.16 Merom. Is that true?

Does that mean that a 2.33 Merom will only be slightly hotter than a 2.16 Yonah?

Are the Meroms only hotter than Yonahs at higher clock speeds? (2.66)
 
BruinJohn said:
My guess is one of these could be an actual refurb, the other could be overstock that they are getting rid of. The $1599 could be the refurbed, and the $2149 could be the overstock. But you can still get a new one for cheaper than the overstock. Probably price mistake.

Well, I ordered one and just got a tracking number. Should be delivered tomorrow.

*fingers crossed* :cool:
 
mac4evan said:
Don't you know that Apple has never and will never make 2 big announcements like that on 1 day!

The MBPs were first because they were released long before the MacBooks were!!!

I bet we have to stare at the new MBP graphic on their home page for 2 more weeks. :rolleyes:
 
AppliedVisual said:
A lot of people keep mentioning Leopard and 64bit, but Leopard will run just fine on the 32bit hardware too. 64bit isn't going to give Leopard itself any magic speed boost and 64bit software can run under Tiger right now...

Tiger only provides partial support for 64 bit and that is only with 64 bit capable processors.

Leopard and 64 bit bit Intel will hopefully provide full 64 bit support. As time goes by, the 64 bit OSX compiler will get better and better. More apps will move to native 64 bit but run partially crippled in 32 bit.

Merom and Leopard is capable of taking advantage of 64 bit now and in the future. Yonah and Tiger, even Yonah & Leopard will run these apps in 32 bit mode but the differential in performance will just keep getting bigger and bigger as time goes on.
 
custom stores broken

This sucks... I've been waiting months for the MBP to be updated and I was ready to buy one at 9am est this morning but I have not been able to because Apple is having problems with there custom B2B stores. It does not let you add the new MBP to your cart. I talked to sales reps earlier in the day and they told me they are aware of the problem and trying to fix it, but I still can't place my order 8 hours later... Anyone else run into this problem?

Very frustrating...
 
mleary said:
This sucks... I've been waiting months for the MBP to be updated and I was ready to buy one at 9am est this morning but I have not been able to because Apple is having problems with there custom B2B stores. It does not let you add the new MBP to your cart. I talked to sales reps earlier in the day and they told me they are aware of the problem and trying to fix it, but I still can't place my order 8 hours later... Anyone else run into this problem?

Very frustrating...

You can't just place the order over the phone?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.