You serious? It's still an OTA update.
Technically the update is over the air, but you have to be connected to a cord to get the update. So it's not a wireless update.
You serious? It's still an OTA update.
Very true. And you are correct, but most people don't work out that long. But some of us do! At least every 1-2 weeks, I go for a 4-5 hour run. And about 6-7 times a year, I go for a run that lasts for 8-14 hours.
Obviously, I don't use the Apple Watch for those. I use the Garmin Fenix 2 instead. I doubt the Apple Watch will ever be able to handle a 14-hour run. As power consumption drops and battery power increases, Apple will simply add more powerful features versus creating functionality that less than 1/1000 of 1% of their users could use.
How stupid. My watch is 48% charged and I need to charge it to 50% to do the update.
Problem is as soon as I take it off my wrist the watch locks and I am unable to see the charge so I don't know when it gets to 50%
I preform the process as described. I'm on wifi, watch charging and the download happens and then I get a message stating download can't be validated due to no internet connection even though I am on wifi any suggestions to resolve? Thanks in advance.
Marc
Thank you for posting your observations! I can't get out for a run until later this evening.
I also don't understand why Apple is not pulling consistent GPS information from the phone during runs. I have a hunch that Apple probably chose to only use the GPS for calibration purposes and perhaps the start/stop (versus using the GPS full time) so they could conserve battery. The problem though is that people do not run at the same pace all the time and often times, people incorporate a short walking break into their running as well...so the Watch will never be very accurate if they are trying to base a good majority of the calculations off arm swing alone. In a lab that might work, but not in the real world.
Wow, the new calendar sucks...
Now you can only scroll through current the day's events and as soon as your last event for the day goes by it switches to tomorrow. So now you have to go back and peck at the tiny full calendar and hope hit the right day to see any other day's events. No more week view anymore. It was great being able to zip through the whole week with the crown (without having the scroll through blank space)... Now, aside from the next event, it is easier to grab the phone than peck at the tiny screen.
I used both my Apple Watch and a Polar monitor today and had several differences, some substantial, while exercising, but at the end, the two devices had EXACTLY the same average. I will try a few more times to see if this result is typical.
I walk a measured route and the Apple Watch gives erroneous results ranging from .17 mile in two miles to .08 mile in two. Maybe this will correct itself over time. We'll see!!
----------
Mine are in the other direction. I use a measured distance on a flat road. The watch regularly signals that I have completed my route from 100 to 200 yards short of the actual finish. I have tried the calibration routine twice, so maybe the GPS system will correct itself with use. Hope so...
Thank you for posting your observations! I can't get out for a run until later this evening.
I also don't understand why Apple is not pulling consistent GPS information from the phone during runs. I have a hunch that Apple probably chose to only use the GPS for calibration purposes and perhaps the start/stop (versus using the GPS full time) so they could conserve battery. The problem though is that people do not run at the same pace all the time and often times, people incorporate a short walking break into their running as well...so the Watch will never be very accurate if they are trying to base a good majority of the calculations off arm swing alone. In a lab that might work, but not in the real world.
She better use the Polar, otherwise she'll get fat from not burning all those extra calories![]()
How are any of us iPad naysayers wrong? Our criticisms of this crap device still stand today as they did when it was first unveiled. It's a big iPod touch not capable of satisfying any computing needs on or near the level of a laptop or a truly modern tablet. Apple has yet to address any of the shortcomings of this product, including the ridiculous product name.
The iPad's value as a novelty is beginning to waver as indicated in the quarterly sales decline as people are beginning to see the disturbing truth behind this product's existence: to separate you from your hard-earned cash by repackaging low-tech parts from a 4.7 body into a 9.7 body. Apple has figured out how to sell the same exact product twice to the gullible.
Every time I'm at an modest coffee shop and see someone pull out an iPad I respond by pulling out my Galaxy Tab 4 10.1 rocking Android 5.0.2 Lollipop with Samsung's innovative TouchWiz UI, a lightning fast quard core Qualcomm Snapdragon, 1.5 GB RAM, and of course a microSDXC card slot for expansion. Bam. Checkmate.
No, my post was in regard to those who think lowly of the ->machine's<- accuracy. A commercial grade machine will have your metrics AND the specific machine's parameters to dial in your performance. Given a generic fitness monitor (AW/Fitbit/telemetry strap) versus a specifically dialed in machine, I would take the machine's word over the generic device. My caveat's were laid out. Of course there is a place for the generic devices. Until you can strap a 600 lbs machine to your body and run a marathon, there will always be a place for wearables. And I like my AW for that.Not sure why you think so lowly of the watch's accuracy.--[snip]--
Im assuming you're being sarcastic by saying the iOS is a novelty and then using a drop in sales to prove your point?
All tablet sales have dropped. In fact, iPad is still by far the #1 selling tablet and its sales dropped the least compared to its competitors. Tablets have plateaued as they're not a yearly upgrade product.
One thing I have noticed and I have only done this twice is that if ask Siri what time it is the response is always 1-2 minutes behind the time on the watch face. Not that big of a deal as I can just flick my wrist to see the actual time. I do notice the few third party apps I use seem to be a little bit faster to load.
Technically the update is over the air, but you have to be connected to a cord to get the update. So it's not a wireless update.
can anyone with 1.0 compare this with your astronomy face? It might be the safari-snappier placebo but to my eyes earth is more saturated in 1.0.1:
Zero issues with the update. Followed Apple's instructions. Downloaded very quickly. No complaints.
Watch seems to be a little quicker overall. Still very pleased with the purchase.
Apple Watch Sport.
Unable to update ?!
Both have been on the charger for three hours.
Brand new iPhone with 50+ GB of space left.
Brand new iWatch with 6 GB of space left, zero music, zero photos, 6 apps.
When I started the update I got an error that I could not get the update because there was no space on my watch to install "tunein" which isn't even on my watch?!?! and needed to manage my storage / delete music, photos or apps?!
Restarted both phone and watch.
Quite the Apple watch app, rebooted, same sugar.
Still stuck on "send update to watch" with 0 progress.
Welcome to being an alpha / beta tester for Apple.