Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
It's good to know that my ARM-based iPhone is well protected from any of those nasty INTEL-ONLY exploits!

What makes you think these were INTEL-only exploits?
Every explanation of the impact of these vulnerabilities explains that ARM and AMD chips are also vulnerable.

Admittedly, the full detail of the flaws is yet to be revealed, but the information available so far suggests all systems need some kind of update or fix to the issue that seems to affect the way (all) operating systems interact with the hardware.
 
Huge update. Highly recommend updating this.
I won't. The last time there was a "huge update" that was "highly recommended", was back during the iOS 7 days. I deliberately kept my devices on iOS 6 because of all the issues and slow-downs with iOS 7, but when a security update was released, I updated my devices and they were never the same again. I've seen what iOS 11 did to my 12.9 iPad Pro... I'll take my chances with my other devices on 10.3.2 and keep them at 10.3.2.

I hope for owners of older devices there is a software update similar to 6.1.6 ( being that it was released after iOS 7) that fixes KRACK and these other vulnerabilities.
There might be. But if it is like that iOS 7 update, any update for 10.x will only be for those devices not capable of upgrading to 11. If a device was capable of running iOS 7, then in order to get the fix, one needed to update their device to 7 (even if they were running 6)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hal~9000
Just installed it. Looks like they finally resolved the top of the screen turning green like you are in a call when clearing notifications. Thank you!
 
I ran Geekbench 4 three times directly before and three times directly after the update. Results (averaged) are as follows:

Before:
Single: 4045
Multi: 9777

After:
Single: 4087
Multi: 9807

Seems like they're all basically the same, within a reasonable margin of error.
 
Funny, my 15 month old 7 Plus is still benchmarking at full speed. I literally just ran a bunch of tests and after this update installs I’m going to benchmark again to see what changes.

Awesome, share you benchmark screenshots at 100% battery and 75% battery
 
If anyone had actually bothered to read through the Snowden NSA documents, they would see that our government has backdoors and ways into all devices and there is no actual security.
 
Good luck with that. This is not about others testing the things for you first, this update is a MUST for EVERYBODY and in case it messes with our devices there's nothing we can do about it, welcome to 2018!

Someone doesn’t know about how many of these critical updates are pulled because something was flawed and then rereleased with a new version number.
[doublepost=1515441430][/doublepost]
This is literally just a security update for Spectre. Don’t be so dramatic.

All something screws up when fixes for “hot bugs” are released.
[doublepost=1515441462][/doublepost]
What are you talking about? iOS 11.2.2 is a public release. iOS 11.2.5 is the latest beta.

Please reread the posts above...
 
It’s worth noting that Apple won’t let you download an iOS update as small as 66 MB using cellular data despite allowing much larger app downloads. And, well, you can stream video online until you’re blue in the face.

This is kind of dumb.
Maybe it's more "don't update on the go", since your charging access may be hindered or you will stay out of service for quite some time? Maybe you have this "50% battery" now, but maybe you're skiing and cold temp will get to it and it won't update successfully?

They limited it via recognizing 3G/WiFi but maybe agenda behind it is much more complex.
 
Someone doesn’t know about how many of these critical updates are pulled because something was flawed and then rereleased with a new version number.
[doublepost=1515441430][/doublepost]

All something screws up when fixes for “hot bugs” are released.
[doublepost=1515441462][/doublepost]

Please reread the posts above...

yeah i get you, anyways apparently these "fixes" are gonna throttle all devices in one way or other so mehhh...damage is done already.

The only REAL fix is gonna come with new hardware and new architecture ant that's gonna take some time (1 year or 2)...
 
Isn't the 5 over five years old now? At some point you have suck it up and get an updated phone.
But the 5 was sold by Apple until Sept 13 and it’s exact brother ( except case) 5C until September 15 - two year support only for that.

You can see lots of examples where Apple continue to sell older hardware ( and independent retailers even longer), yet Apple drops support quickly.

Microsoft gets a bit of a bashing on these forums, but they released a security patch for XP ( released in 2001!) in June last year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: goodcow
So the most plausible explanation for why the betas have been 11.2.5, not 11.2.2: because Apple knew they would have to insert at least one bugfix release in between for security reasons.

What about devices left behind on iOS 10 like the iPhone 5 and 5C? Are they going to remain insecure?

Apple has rarely pushed security updates for previous iOS releases.

Amazing how quickly Apple pushed this out after it broke last week.

They were under embargo; they've known since June, I believe.

It's good to know that my ARM-based iPhone is well protected from any of those nasty INTEL-ONLY exploits!

That was Meltdown; this is Spectre.

(And Meltdown, too, wasn't Intel-specific. Some ARM CPUs are affected.)
 
I ran Geekbench 4 three times directly before and three times directly after the update. Results (averaged) are as follows:

Before:
Single: 4045
Multi: 9777

After:
Single: 4087
Multi: 9807

Seems like they're all basically the same, within a reasonable margin of error.

Considering it's a workaround for Safari I don't see how Geekbench results would be affected anyway...
 
  • Like
Reactions: kkk123kkk123kkk
yeah i get you, anyways apparently these "fixes" are gonna throttle all devices in one way or other so mehhh...damage is done already.

The only REAL fix is gonna come with new hardware and new architecture...

It’s not about the throttle. It’s about how sometimes rushed deployments have led to disasters. Point to case when Apple pulled an Apple Watch update (can’t recall exact WatchOS) because it was bricking Apple Watches. The fix? Swap it for a new one at an Apple Store.

I don’t have access to an Apple Store, so I can’t accidentally brick my iPhone. Hence I let others update and then read reactions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: -BigMac-
It’s not about the throttle. It’s about how sometimes rushed deployments have led to disasters. Point to case when Apple pulled an Apple Watch update (can’t recall exact WatchOS) because it was bricking Apple Watches. The fix? Swap it for a new one at an Apple Store.

I don’t have access to an Apple Store, so I can’t accidentally brick my iPhone. Hence I let others update and then read reactions.

yes i got you, in MY case IS about the throttle. Even if the update turn fine apprently things are gonna get a little slow from now onwards and that's pretty pretty sad. All the world devices are faulty now, and all are geting old soon.
 
Last edited:
Ran the benchmarks for Safari (JetStream, ARES-6 and Speedometer). Also ran older ones like Sunspider, Kraken and Octane. All were so close that there’s basically no difference. If I ran each 10 times in a row I might get enough data to average them out and see a difference. For now there were all within 1-2% (faster or slower). Geekbench 4 was also the same.

Only odd thing is JetStream wouldn’t return a score. It showed “NaN” for a result for some tests and for the overall score. I haven’t figured out what that means yet. Anyone else try JetStream yet AFTER the update? Before it worked fine.
 
Considering it's a workaround for Safari I don't see how Geekbench results would be affected anyway...

Oops. I neglected to look at the release notes and assumed this was a patch for the OS level vulnerabilities, not just protecting from browser based attacks.
 
I ran Geekbench 4 three times directly before and three times directly after the update. Results (averaged) are as follows:

Before:
Single: 4045
Multi: 9777

After:
Single: 4087
Multi: 9807

Seems like they're all basically the same, within a reasonable margin of error.

averaging a 400+ point improvement consistently on my 8 plus after the update, which I'm still surprised about.
 
Ran the benchmarks for Safari (JetStream, ARES-6 and Speedometer). Also ran older ones like Sunspider, Kraken and Octane. All were so close that there’s basically no difference. If I ran each 10 times in a row I might get enough data to average them out and see a difference. For now there were all within 1-2% (faster or slower). Geekbench 4 was also the same.

Only odd thing is JetStream wouldn’t return a score. It showed “NaN” for a result for some tests and for the overall score. I haven’t figured out what that means yet. Anyone else try JetStream yet AFTER the update? Before it worked fine.

Nice, good to know....my main worry is my old i7 3770k running windows 7 though....
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.