Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I won't give up my my jailbrakes

I love using my iPhone as a hotspot for my wireless-only iPad. I won't bother updating software in either device for a while.
 
A lot of upset jailbreakers in here.

I just want them to allow an unlock feature once your contract with ATT is up.
 
Apologies if this has been addressed in another post (redirect appreciated), but has anyone else had issues with their Home button? I find that sometimes it doesn't respond when I press it once, so then I press it again and it acts as if I'd pressed it twice (which, technically, I did I guess).

I have one or two friends that have the same issue. I wonder if this is a software thing or a faulty hardware thing.

Thanks.

Holler.


yes I have, hope this update or iOS5 will fix the problem
 
A lot of upset jailbreakers in here.

I just want them to allow an unlock feature once your contract with ATT is up.

I'm not upset at the update, I'll just skip it until there's a JB for it. It's not like when iOS 5 will be released and I'm missing out on new features.

I'm upset at stupid people who make assumptions that JB phones break more than others.
 
Unlocking is legal. Is jailbreaking legal--i.e., protected activity under the DCMA?
Yes. But that is just a protection from any criminal or legal actions. Apple is under no obligation to support jailbreaking.

Do they? You would think that with such stringent testing, Apple would have discovered this PDF vulnerability prior to Comex......

I still find it amusing.

There is no way that any company can detect every vulnerability. No matter the level of testing.
 
Apple Cares

They aren't. They're preventing other people from breaking into your phone and installing malware and rootkits that could prevent you from jailbreaking your own phone.

Clearly, it is because Apple cares (snort!)...about their stock price. Users are just people who give you money, don't you know?

Only jailbreak that actually made sense to me was one for a Wifi hotspot. Paying $20/month to Verizon or AT&T is a complete and utter ripoff. You are paying money to them to use your bandwidth that you are already paying for??

Didn't see anything else on Cydia that was really worth it to me, though I have no objections to jailbreaking or Cydia.
 
A lot of upset jailbreakers in here.

I just want them to allow an unlock feature once your contract with ATT is up.
That's a function of the carrier, not Apple. You can buy an unlocked iPhone today in the U.S.

In some markets (I believe Belgium is one), carrier locked handsets are illegal.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_3 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8J2 Safari/6533.18.5)

Why oh why is CDMA iPhone still being kept to iOS 4.2 series?

VZW probably paid apple a bunch of money for the iphone to cut their churn numbers and keep some people happy. cheaper to pay apple and keep customers than advertise for new ones
 
i thought jailbreaking was legal and your right to do so..... why then does apple keep issuing patches to break the jailbreakers....?

Yes it is legal, but when a security hole is present in the OS, apple has no choice but to fix it, it's nothing to do with making 'jailbreakers upset'.
 
That's a function of the carrier, not Apple. You can buy an unlocked iPhone today in the U.S.

In some markets (I believe Belgium is one), carrier locked handsets are illegal.

I'm not buying an ATT phone, I'm buying an apple phone subsidized by ATT for 2 years.
Once the two years is up, I technically own an apple phone that should be able to be used on any GSM network. Unlocking a phone once the contract is done isn't some new idea. It's been going on for a while now. I'd just like the current iphones to follow suit.
 
Not true. Last year I took my iPhone to the Apple store and they replaced it after the fact that they saw it was jailbroken.

That particular representative may have replaced it, but they were under no legal obligation to do so. Jailbreaking does, in fact, void your warranty. (Yes, we all know that restoring the factory firmware is easy to do, but legally speaking, jailbreaking voids your warranty).
 
i thought jailbreaking was legal and your right to do so..... why then does apple keep issuing patches to break the jailbreakers....?

Because each jailbreak results from a security breach, which must be patched. If nice guys can find the hole, then so can the nasties, and use it for something else. Want Trojans on your iPhone?
 
No kidding.

However, with the resources and staff that Apple has, you would think the patch would have arrived a lot sooner. That's all I'm saying.

That's flawed thinking. The patching process that gets done at Apple undoubtedly is far more complete than what somebody else does simply because that other person doesn't need to test and do QC while Apple does.

Formal bug repair is always going to be done at a different pace. Apple has a schedule for everything - they can't just go patching the OS every single time a bug creeps around when you are dealing with complex code.
 
Jailbreak developers will continue to be able to jailbreak whatever new iOS Apple throws out. It's really not the best use of their time, and those with jailbroken iphones can just say on the iOS they have to maintain the jailbreak.

And I thought jailbreaking was legal now anyway?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.