Oh really? You don't think it's possible to watch video for 10 hours on a 14 hour flight? Maybe take your head out of your ass occasionally.And who can really watch 10h of nonstop video on an effing plane??
That guy is just a joke.
Oh really? You don't think it's possible to watch video for 10 hours on a 14 hour flight? Maybe take your head out of your ass occasionally.And who can really watch 10h of nonstop video on an effing plane??
That guy is just a joke.
You are aware that even on the original iphone, you can use the ipod function while using a reading app, aren't you? That level of multitasking is obviously supported.
While I do want rapid task switching, even when I have 20 apps open on my macbook, I'm rarely truly using more than one simultaneously. What about you?
Also I don't understand the constant whining about the lack of Flash. As if that would really be a huge omission.[...]
I really, really hope that Flash will die, the sooner the better.
This direction of Apple product becomes annoying!?
![]()
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/01/27/defective_by_design/
http://www.defectivebydesign.org/blog/apple-ipad-drm-petition
I said: You cannot put your EXISTING photos, music, documents etc etc etc (also known as 'resources') onto the iPad without the use of an additional PC or Mac to Sync it with.
You said: Yes, you can. Again, you haven't bothered to read even the bare bit of info that's already available from the data sheet and SDK first look.
"File Sharing. A shared file directory is provided that will mount on your Mac or PC. This is presumably how files such as iWork documents will be transferred to and from the iPad. iPad applications will be able to access this shared directory."
Uhh that IS by using an EXISTING MAC or PC... right?
You're a Moron.
Multitasking is an OS limitation. They can update the OS and add true multitasking for all apps. Not saying they WILL w/o a hardware upgrade but they CAN.
The better reading experience is a plus, and I like the exceptional single-piece portability, but honestly the primary reason I'm going to fork over $500 for this instead of relying on my MacBook Air is the fact I get 2 - 3 hours, max, battery life on my Air under normal usage conditions and the iPad has a rated 10-hour battery life w/ weeks of standby. Actual usage will decrease max battery life, but I'll still not have to bother with plugging it in during the middle of the day, so long as I remember to charge it overnight.
$500 is still a lot cheaper than going around $1,500 for a MacBook Pro with a 7-hour battery. If there were an Air on the market w/ an 8-hour battery, might be a different story.
Yes and the Windows UI (any desktop UI, for that matter) is totally unusable on a 7" touch screen device, thank you.
It has ASSISTED GPS, and only in the 3G enabled model. Without 3G coverage or a WiFi connection to get map data, it is almost useless (as is the iPhone under similar conditions).
This guy should buy an Android device and stop wasting his time drawing silly posters.
Oh and since when is "sharing music and books" legal again? Technically you can share you Apple-purchased music and books because they are not DRM protected. So what does this guy want?
No, in fact, because you'll be able to download your photos and other files straight to it via devices that mount over the dock connector, as already revealed.
If you are only trying to say that "any files I have on a computer I already own will have to get transferred to this to use them!" well then... yes, you're right as far as that goes. Right, but pointless, because that's true anytime you buy a new device.![]()
In all likelihood, the iPad's A-GPS implementation merely uses a cellular data connection to locate via cell-tower position. This will not be useful for precise locations, including things like turn-by-turn, etc.
You are such a fool, you know that. What you think does Assisted GPS mean? Hm? really, tell me. If you don't know, maybe you should google it.
There is no way SL will run on this, it's not a intel processor, therefor it will never happen.
He's not the only advocate of e-ink on this site. I am another. I didn't even think I had a problem reading LCD screens until I started reading my Kindle, and realized I always have a low-grade headache going on when I read a screen.
Uhh my external HDD, sd-cards and USB flash drives which are full of resources, can all connect to the iPad through the dock connector (without a PC or Mac) and allow me to copy my EXISTING content to the device? I dont think so.
You're WAY off track. You said you dont need an existing PC or Mac to use in conjunction with the iPad to access your existing media. Which is incorrect. Then you contradicted yourself by saying the iPad syncs with a shared folder to your Mac or PC.
Seriously, if you're going to jump in on a comment, PLEASE read the whole thing - and maybe even try and understand it first before making a fool out of yourself.
This is a good point.
This was posted by Rob Sheridan on the mashable story and pretty much summarizes how I also feel about the iPad:
Everyone loves to jump on these things as soon as they get announced and tally up the list of missing features. Remember the outcry over the original iPhone? After it was announced it was quickly denounced as "a toy" by smartphone aficionados, and the lack of 3G, GPS, dev kit, SD slot, physical keyboard, Flash, and a myriad of other wishlist features were called out as "dealbreakers" left and right. But then people *used* it. And look where the iPhone is now. It's the biggest thing in the world, has had some amazing upgrades, and the detractors ate their words. Now here we are again, and Santa didn't bring the cynical geeks all the presents they asked for, and again it's a "fail" and a "dealbreaker," and again you're going to see this thing become massively popular, and by its third iteration be an awesomely powerful entertainment device that for many casual users replaces the need for a laptop AND a smartphone.
We geeks who obsess over this stuff all day may cry afoul over multitasking and HDMI, but does your Mom? Your kid brother? My Mom doesn't use her phone enough to feel the need for an iPhone, and she doesn't use her computer enough to need a laptop. But she'd probably LOVE to have this thing in the kitchen with her to browse recipes, or to read magazines on the couch while her husband watches sports. This is a mainstream device for casual users, and I think you'll find that many of them simply don't need a laptop, especially when there's a fun and pretty device that can do more or less everything they need to do. Non-geeks just want to read their email (check), browse the web (check), read magazines (check), check their Facebook (check), watch movies and YouTube (check), listen to music (check), etc. Oh, and the million other things they'll be able to do thanks to the apps that will be coming out for this thing.
As a geek and a poweruser, I wish there was multitasking. And a camera. And a USB port. And Flash. And HDMI. And I'm getting sick of Apple's closed ecosystem. But many of those things would add to the price tag, and this is a first-gen mass-market device to open up the door. To get things rolling. iPad 2 is going to have a camera, and GPS, and probably an evolution of the operating system that supports a form of multitasking. And by that time, you'll have played air hockey and chess with your friends on this thing, and experienced multimedia versions of your favorite magazines, and watched HD movies on the plane without hauling out your laptop, and I bet it's going to win people over more and more. The hype got the best of all of us, and there's a lot to be desired here, but I think it's going to evolve quickly, and win people over in a very surprising way.
It seems that most people disappointed with the iPad are technical guys who like to own a device that can do more than other devices.